Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T09:24:07.337Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Private banking and crony capitalism in Egypt

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 March 2018

Abstract

Why do private banks lend preferentially to politically connected firms? Focusing on the case of Egypt during the later years of Mubarak's rule, we identified politically connected firms, and we documented, using the Orbis corporate data on large firms in Egypt, that they received a disproportionate amount of the loans going to the private sector during 2003–11. We then investigated the determinants of their borrowings, and we found evidence that connected firms were more attractive to banks both because they made larger profits, and because they were seen to be implicitly guaranteed by the state against failure. We also found evidence that non-connected firms had a lower demand for loans.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © V.K. Aggarwal 2018 and published under exclusive license to Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

We would like to thank Philip Keefer, Adeel Malik, Izak Atiyas, Hamouda Chekir, Stijn Claessens, the two referees of this journal, and the participants in the workshop of the Economic Research Forum (Marakesh, 2016) on the Political Economy of Transitions in the Arab world, for their valuable comments and suggestions. Financial support from ERF is gratefully acknowledged. The paper does not reflect the views of the World Bank.

References

Acemoglu, Daron, Hassan, Tarek, and Tahoun, Ahmed. 2014. “The Power of the Street Evidence from Egypt's Arab Spring.” NBER Working Paper No. 20665.Google Scholar
Adly, Amr Ismail. 2009. “Politically-embedded cronyism: The case of post-liberalization Egypt.” Business and Politics 11 (4).Google Scholar
Adly, A. 2016. Egypt's Regime Faces an Authoritarian Catch-22. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.Google Scholar
Alley, April Longley. 2010. “The rules of the game: unpacking patronage politics in Yemen.” The Middle East Journal 64 (3): 385409.Google Scholar
Bianco, Magda and Nicodano, Giovanna. 2006. “Pyramidal groups and debt.” European Economic Review 50 (4): 937–61.Google Scholar
Boubekeur, A. 2013. Rolling either way? Algerian entrepreneurs as both agents of change and means of preservation of the system. The Journal of North African Studies 18 (3): 469–81.Google Scholar
Boubakri, N., Cosset, J. C., and Saffar, W.. 2012. “The impact of political connections on firms' operating performance and financing decisions.” Journal of Financial Research 33 (5): 397423.Google Scholar
Cammett, M., Diwan, I., Richards, A., and Waterbury, J.. 2015. A Political Economy of the Middle East. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Chekir, Hamouda and Diwan, Ishac. 2015. “Crony Capitalism in Egypt.Journal of Globalization and Development ISSN (Online): 1,948837.Google Scholar
Claessens, Stijn, Feijen, Erik, and Laeven, Luc. 2008. “Political connections and preferential access to finance: The role of campaign contributions.” Journal of Financial Economics 88 (3): 554–80.Google Scholar
Cull, Robert and Xu, Lixin Colin. 2005. “Institutions, ownership, and finance: the determinants of profit reinvestment among Chinese firms.” Journal of Financial Economics 77 (1): 117–46.Google Scholar
Demmelhuber, T. and Roll, S.. 2007. “Maintenance of Domination in Egypt: The Role of Reforms and Economic Oligarchs.” Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik (SWP), Deutsches Institut für Internationale Politik und Sicherheit.Google Scholar
Dewaelheyns, Nico and Van Hulle, Cynthia. 2010. “Internal capital markets and capital structure: bank versus internal debt.” European Financial Management 16 (3): 345–73.Google Scholar
Diwan Ishac, Philip Keefer, and Schiffbauer, Marc. 2015. “Pyramid Capitalism: Cronyism, Regulation, and Employment Growth in Egypt.” World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 7354.Google Scholar
Diwan, Ishac and Squire, Lyn. 1995. “Private assets and public debts: external finance in a peaceful Middle East.” Middle East Journal 49 (1): 6988.Google Scholar
El-Naggar, Ahmad. 2009. “Economic policy: from state control to decay and corruption.” Egypt: The Moment of Change. London and New York: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Faccio, M. 2010. “Differences between Politically Connected and Nonconnected Firms: A Cross-Country Analysis.” Financial Management 39: 905–28.Google Scholar
Faccio, M. 2007. “Politically connected firms.” American Economic Review 96 (3): 69386.Google Scholar
Faccio, M., Masulis, R., and McConnell, J.J.. 2006. “Political connections and corporate bailouts.Journal of Finance 61: 2,597–635.Google Scholar
Haddad, Bassam. 2012. “Syria, the Arab uprisings, and the political economy of authoritarian resilience,” In The Arab Spring. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 211–26.Google Scholar
Henry, Clement Moore and Springborg, Robert. 2010. Globalization and the Politics of Development in the Middle East, Vol. 1. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Henry, Clement M. 1996. The Mediterranean debt crescent: money and power in Algeria, Egypt, Morocco, Tunisia, and Turkey. Gainesville, FL: University Press of Florida.Google Scholar
Heydemann, S. (ed.) 2014. Networks of Privilege: Rethinking the Politics of Economic Reform in the Middle East. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Kienle, Eberhard. 2004. “Reconciling Privilege and Reform.” In Networks of Privilege: Rethinking the Politics of Economic Reform in the Middle East, edited by Heydemann, S.. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 281–96.Google Scholar
Khwaja, Asim Ijaz and Mian, Atif. 2005. “Do lenders favor politically connected firms? Rent provision in an emerging financial market.Quarterly Journal of Economics 120 (4): 1,371–411.Google Scholar
King, Stephen Juan 2009. The new authoritarianism in the Middle East and North Africa. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Li, Hongbin et al. 2008. “Political connections, financing and firm performance: Evidence from Chinese private firms.” Journal of development economics 87 (2): 283–99.Google Scholar
Loewe, Markus. 2013. “Industrial Policy in Egypt 2004–2011.” DIE Discussion Paper 13/2013, Deutsches Institut fuer Entwicklungspolitik, Bonn.Google Scholar
Morck, Randall and Yeung, Bernard. 2004. “Family control and the rent-seeking society.” Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 28 (4): 391409.Google Scholar
Osman, Tarek. 2013. Egypt on the Brink: From Nasser to the Muslim Brotherhood. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Owen, Roger. 2004. State, power and politics in the making of the modern Middle East. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Rijkers, Bob, Freund, Caroline L., and Nucifora, Antonio. 2014. “All in the family: state capture in Tunisia.” World Bank Policy Research Paper 6810.Google Scholar
Roll, Steven. 2010. “Finance Matters!’ The Influence of Financial Sector Reforms on the Development of the Entrepreneurial Elite in Egypt.” Mediterranean Politics 15: 349–70.Google Scholar
Sfakianakis, John. 2004. “The Whales of the Nile: Networks, Businessmen and Bureaucrats during the Era of Privatization in Egypt.” In Networks of Privilege: Rethinking the Politics of Economic Reform in the Middle East, edited by Heydemann, S.. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Tohamy, Sahar. 2017. Private Sector Regulation and Institutions in Egypt: Mapping and Reform Priorities in Selected Areas. Emory University mimeo. Atlanta, GA.Google Scholar
Werker, Eric et al. 2012. “Ahmed Ezz: The Rise and Fall of an Egyptian Steel Magnate.” Harvard Business School mimeo. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
World Bank. 2008. Transforming Egypt. A Development Policy Review. Middle East and North Africa Development Report. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.Google Scholar
World Bank. 2014. “Jobs or Privileges: Unleashing the employment potential of the Middle East and North Africa.” Washington, D.C.: World Bank.Google Scholar
World Bank. 2017. “The Doing Business Report.” Washington, D.C.: World Bank.Google Scholar