Published online by Cambridge University Press: 07 November 2014
Most literature on juvenile delinquency describes it as essentially a product of the lower socio-economic classes. While there has been some speculation over the incidence and quality of middle-class delinquency, what evidence exists is largely impressionistic. Nevertheless, the prevailing view is that delinquency among middle-class youth has increased in recent years. The present paper seeks a sociological and theoretical perspective to help account for the dominant forms of juvenile delinquency among middle-class youth. It attempts also to explain the emergence and the particular qualities of middle-class delinquency as a consequence of structural changes taking place in the larger society.
Accounting for middle-class delinquency in North America requires an understanding of the dominant culture of middle-class youth. Structural changes in society over the last half-century have produced opportunities for extensive adolescent peer-group participation and the emergence of a mass youth culture. During the growth of this youth culture, in which the majority of middle-class teenagers participate, there have emerged, jointly, both delinquent and non-delinquent patterns of behaviour. It is the thesis of this paper that the bulk of middle-class delinquency occurs in the course of customary, non-delinquent activities and falls within the limits of adolescent group norms. Moreover the knowledge of both delinquent and non-delinquent patterns in the youth culture is widely shared among middle-class teenagers. Thus, in order to account for middle-class delinquency one need not look for a separate “delinquent subculture.”
We are indebted to Professors Albert K. Cohen and Sheldon Stryker of Indiana University for their advice and criticism in the preparation of this paper.
1 Riesman, David, Glazer, Nathan, and Denney, Reuel, The Lonely Crowd (New York, 1955), 30 ff.Google Scholar
2 Ibid., 79.
3 White Collar, (New York, 1956), 24.Google Scholar
4 See Whyte, William H. Jr., The Organization Man (New York, 1957).Google Scholar
5 Ibid., 150.
6 Riesman, et al., The Lonely Crowd, 67.Google Scholar
7 Friedenberg, Edgar Z., The Vanishing Adolescent (Boston, 1959), 1–38.Google Scholar
8 Cohen, Albert K., “Teachers vs. Students: Changing Power Relations in the Secondary Schools.” A public lecture at the University of California, Berkeley, 08 22, 1961.Google Scholar See also Whyte, , Organization Man, 425 ff.Google Scholar
9 Seeley, John R., Sim, R. Alexander, and Loosley, Elizabeth W., Crestwood Heights (Toronto, 1956), 236.Google Scholar
10 Ibid., 245.
11 Whyte, , Organization Man, 426.Google Scholar
12 Ibid., 434. See also Seeley, , Crestwood Heights, 116.Google Scholar
13 Coleman, James S., Social Climates in High Schools (Washington: U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, 1961), 3 ff.Google Scholar
14 Coleman, James S., “Academic Achievement and the Structure of Competition,” Harvard Educational Review, XXIX, Fall, 1959, 339–51.Google Scholar
15 See Coleman, James S., The Adolescent Society (Glencoe, Ill., 1961), 244 ff.Google Scholar
16 Ibid., p. 34.
17 For some recent alternative views on middle-class delinquency see Bohlke, Robert H., “Social Mobility, Stratification Inconsistency and Middle Class Delinquency,” Social Problems, VIII, no. 4, Spring, 1961 Google Scholar; Cohen, Albert K., Delinquent Boys (Glencoe, Ill., 1955)Google Scholar; Cohen, Albert K., “Middle-Class Delinquency and the Social Structure,” a paper read at the annual meetings of the American Sociological Society, 1957 Google Scholar; Cohen, Albert K. and Short, James, “Research in Delinquent Subcultures,” Social Issues, XIV, no. 3, 1958.Google Scholar
18 Dubin, Robert, “Deviant Behaviour and Social Structure: Continuities in Social Theory,” American Sociological Review, XXIV, 04, 1959, 152.Google Scholar
19 The basic idea is taken from Cohen, , Delinquent Boys, 60.Google Scholar
20 Coleman, , Adolescent Society, 23.Google Scholar
21 Gordon, C. Wayne, The Social System of the High School (Glencoe, Ill., 1957), 119–22.Google Scholar
22 Some of the terms used by middle-class adolescents seem to serve as a convenient technique of immunization actually inhibiting the development of a delinquent self-conception. The innocuous term “joy-riding” seems simply to define the use to which the car is put and mirror the motives of the boys. Furthermore, the automobile offers multiple functionally related services for the middle-class adolescent. A status symbol, it enhances the success of dating and also presents easily taken opportunities for engaging in sex behaviour.
23 Coleman, , Adolescent Society, 121.Google Scholar
24 Cloward, Richard A. and Ohlin, Lloyd W., New Perspectives on Juvenile Delinquency (New York: Columbia University School of Social Work, 1959, mimeo.).Google Scholar
25 Coleman, , Adolescent Society, 124.Google Scholar
26 Gordon, , Social System of the High School, 113–14.Google Scholar
27 Whyte, , Organization Man, 425.Google Scholar
28 Seeley, , Crestwood Heights, 99.Google Scholar