Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T18:55:00.440Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

An Inequality Between Numerical Homotopy Invariants

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

M. J. M. Priddis*
Affiliation:
Birmingham University, Birmingham, England; Liverpool University, Liverpool, England
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In (1), Berstein and Ganea denned the nilpotency class of a based topological space. For a based topological space X we write nil X for the nilpotency class of the group ΩX in the category of based topological spaces and based homotopy classes. Hilton, in (3), defined the nilpotency class, nil class K of a based semi-simplicial (s.-s.) complex; actually, the restriction of connectedness can be removed. Hence, by using the total singular complex functor S, an invariant (nil class SX) can be defined for a based topological space X.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Mathematical Society 1968

References

1. Berstein, I. and Ganea, T., Homotopical nilpotency, Illinois J. Math. 5 (1961), 99130.Google Scholar
2. Gonea, T., Hilton, P. J., and Peterson, F. P., On the homotopy commutativity of loop-spaces and suspensions, Topology 1 (1962), 133141.Google Scholar
3. Hilton, P. J., On a generalization of nilpotency to semi-simplified complexes, Proc. London Math. Soc. (3) 10 (1960), 604622.Google Scholar
4. Kan, D. M., Homotopy theory and c.s.s. groups, Ann. of Math. (2) 68 (1958), 3853.Google Scholar
5. MacLane, S., Simplicial topology (Lecture Notes, Chicago, 1959).Google Scholar
6. Milnor, J., The geometric realization of a semi-simplicial complex, Ann. of Math. (2) 65 1957), 357362.Google Scholar