Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-16T00:32:21.605Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Collineations, Correlations, Polarities, and Conics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

J. F. Rigby
J. F. Rigby*
Affiliation:
University College, Cardiff
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

It is well known that planes of characteristic 2 behave differently from other Pappian projective planes. For this reason their detailed properties are usually ignored in books on synthetic projective geometry, especially when conies are being discussed. This can give rise to the misleading impression that planes of characteristic 2 are more difficult to deal with, while a cursory introduction to conies in such planes (e.g. Theorem 4.3) may suggest that the notion of “pole and polar” no longer exists.

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Mathematics , Volume 19 , 1967 , pp. 1027 - 1041
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Mathematical Society 1967

References

1. Baer, R., Projectivities of finite projective planes, Amer. J. Math., 69 (1947), 653–684.Google Scholar
2. Coxeter, H. S. M., Introduction to geometry (New York, 1961).Google Scholar
3. Coxeter, H. S. M., Projective geometry (New York, 1964).Google Scholar
4. Pedoe, D., An introduction to projective geometry (Oxford, 1963).Google Scholar
5. Pickert, G., Projektive Ebenen (Berlin, 1955).Google Scholar
6. Segre, B., Lectures on modern geometry (Rome, 1961).Google Scholar
7. von Staudt, K. G. C., Geometrie der Lage (Nürnberg, 1847).Google Scholar
8. Veblen, O. and Young, J. W., Projective geometry, Vol. 1 (Boston, 1910).Google Scholar