Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-16T01:24:29.252Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Generalizations of the Converse of the Contraction Mapping Principle

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

James S. W. Wong*
Affiliation:
University of Alberta, Edmonton
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This paper is an outgrowth of studies related to the converse of the contraction mapping principle. A natural formulation of the converse statement may be stated as follows: “Let X be a complete metric space, and T be a mapping of X into itself such that for each x ∈ X, the sequence of iterates ﹛Tnx﹜ converges to a unique fixed point ωX. Then there exists a complete metric in X in which T is a contraction.” This is in fact true, even in a stronger sense, as may be seen from the following result of Bessaga (1).

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Mathematical Society 1966

References

1. Bessaga, C., On the converse of the Banach fixed-point principle, Coll. Math., 7 (1959), 4143.Google Scholar
2. Birkhoff, G., Lattice theory (Providence, 1948).Google Scholar
3. Wong, J. S. W., A generalization of the converse of contraction mapping principle, Amer. Math. Soc. Notices, 11 (1964), 385.Google Scholar