Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T14:37:33.206Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Dialogue and Public Space: An Exploration of Radio and Information Communications Technologies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 July 2005

Ann Dale  and
Ted Naylor
Ann Dale
Affiliation:
Royal Roads University
Ted Naylor
Affiliation:
University of Alberta
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Abstract. The use of internet technologies, specifically interactive electronic dialogues, has the potential to revive the shrinking Canadian public sphere. Precedent for this assertion can be found in the historical effect of radio technology. The development of Canadian radio forums in the twentieth century such as the National Farm Radio Forum and the Citizen's Forum provided a crude two way interactive medium that helped to shape collective Canadian norms and values. The internet holds the potential to reintroduce national dialogues and reinvigorate the public sphere at a time when Canadians both need and want to address national issues such as environmental concerns and sustainable development. As such dialogue occurs in a “cyberspace” removed from the limitations of physical geography, internet dialogues allow participants from widely diverse groups to come together, surmounting traditional barriers to interaction. Though the danger exists that internet technologies will be abused to reinforce passive static forms of communication, the potential for highly interactive two way dialogue holds the promise of bringing the public into timely and necessary debates on public policy.

Résumé. L'utilisation des technologies de l'Internet, spécifiquement les dialogues électroniques interactifs, a la capacité de ranimer le public canadien. Cette affirmation peut être prouvée en constatant l'effet historique de la technologie de la radio : au vingtième siècle, le développement canadien des tribunes radiophoniques tels que le forum de la ferme nationale et celui des citoyens ont aidé à mettre sur pied un média permettant un dialogue direct entre les participants sur les normes et les valeurs canadiennes collectives. L'Internet a la capacité de réintroduire les dialogues et de revigorer le public national à un moment où les Canadiens ont besoin et veulent discuter des problèmes nationaux tels que l'environnement et le développement durable. Lorsqu'un tel dialogue se produit dans un “ Cyberespace ”, les limites géographiques sont éliminées et ceci permet à des groupes de divers participants de s'unir, surmontant les barrières de communication traditionnelles. Bien que le danger existe où les technologies de l'Internet pourraient être abusées pour ainsi renforcer les formes passives et statiques de communication, le potentiel pour un média permettant un dialogue direct promet de rassembler le public pour des discussions nécessaires sur l'ordre public.

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique , Volume 38 , Issue 1 , March 2005 , pp. 203 - 225
Copyright
© 2005 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abell, H.A. 1968. “Assessment of the project.” In An African Experiment in Radio Forums for Rural Development: Ghana 1964/1965, eds. H.C. Abell, W.F. Coleman and A.A. Opoku. Paris: UNESCO, pp. 22–70.
Anderson, R. 2002. “On Dialogue and Its Difficulties.” Morris J. Wosk, Centre for Dialogue. Simon Fraser University; document available at the Web site http://www.sfu.ca//dialogue/publications/ondialogoues.htm, accessed September 20, 2003.
Barnes, S. 1996. “Cyberspace: Creating Paradoxes for the Ecology of Self.” In Communication Cyberspace: Social Interaction in an Electronic Environment, eds. L. Strate, R. Jacobson and S. B. Gibson. New Jersey: Hampton Press.
Bohm, D. 1996. On Dialogue. London: Routledge Publishing.
CBC. 2003. http://cbc.ca/soundslikecanada, accessed September 19, 2003
CBC. 2004. http://cbc.ca/radio/history, accessed September 20, 2004
Castells, M. 2000. The Rise of the Network Society. Second edition. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.
Chomsky, N. and E.S. Herman. 1988. Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media. Pantheon Books: New York.
Citizens' Forum on Canada's Future. 1991. Theme Report: A Working Paper. Ottawa: Supply and Services Canada.
Coleman, W.F. and A.A. Opoku. 1968. “Rural radio forum project in Ghana.” In An African Experiment in Radio Forums for Rural Development: Ghana 1964/1965, eds. H.C. Abell, W.F. Coleman and A.A. Opoku. Paris: UNESCO, pp. 7–17.
Dale, A. 2001. At the Edge: Sustainable Development in the 21st Century. Vancouver: UBC Press.
Dale, A. and J. Onyx (in press). A Dynamic Balance. Social Capital and Sustainable Community Development. Vancouver: UBC Press.
Dale, J. 2002. “Public Dialogue: Bridging the Gap Between Knowledge and Wisdom.” Montreal: McGill-McConnell Program: Master of Management for National Voluntary Sector Leaders. M.A. Thesis.
DeLuca, K.M. and J. Peeples. 2002. “From Public Sphere to Public Screen: Democracy, Activism, and the ‘Violence’ of Seattle.” Critical Studies in Media Communication 19: 125–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emery, F. and M. Emery. 1976. A Choice of Futures. Holland: Leiden.
Etzioni, A. 2000. “Creating good communities and good societies.” Contemporary Sociology 29(1): 188–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraser, N. 1992. “Re-thinking the public sphere: A contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy.” In Habermas and the public sphere, ed. C. Calhoun. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 109–142.
Gergen, K.J. 2000. The Saturated Self. New York: Basic Books.
Grudin, R. 1996. On Dialogue: An Essay in Free Thought. New York: Houghton Mifflin Co.
Habermas, J. 1989. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Hackett, R.A. and Y. Zhao. 1998. Sustaining Democracy? Journalism and the Politics of Objectivity. Toronto: Garamond Press.
Held, D. 1995. Democracy and Global Order: From the Modern Nation State to Cosmopolitan Governance. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Joss, S. 2002. “Towards the Public Sphere: Reflections on the Development of Participatory Technology Assessment.” Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, vol. 22(3): 220–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jordan, T. 1999. Cyberpower: The Culture and Politics of Cyberspace and the Internet. London: Routledge Publishing.
Kellner, D. 2004. “Habermas, the Public Sphere, and Democracy: A Critical Intervention,” In Perspectives on Habermas, L. Hahn (ed.), Chicago: Open Court Press
Lind, C. 1995. Something's Wrong Somewhere. Halifax: Fernwood Publishing.
Lorimer, R. and D. Wilson. Communication Canada: Issues in Broadcasting and New Technologies. Toronto: Kagan and Woo Ltd.
Maranhao, T. 1990. The Interpretation of Dialogue. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Mathur, J.C. and P. Neurath. 1959. An Indian Experiment in Farm Radio Forum. Paris: UNESCO.
McChesney, R.W. 1996. “The Internet and U.S Communication Policy-Making in Historical and Critical Perspective.” In Journal of Computer Mediated Communication vol. 1(4), eds. J. Newhagen and S. Rafaeli; available at the JCMC Web site at www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol1/issue4/vol1no4.html, accessed October 12, 2004.Google Scholar
McChesney, R.W. 1999. Rich Media, Poor Democracy: Communication Politics in Dubious Times. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
McCoy, M.L. and P.L. Scully. 2002. “Deliberative Dialogue to Expand Civic Engagement: What Kind of Talk Does Democracy Need?” National Civic Review 91(2): 117–135.Google Scholar
Nanz, P. and J. Steffek. 2004. “Global Governance, Participation and the Public Sphere.” Government and Opposition vol. 39(1): 314–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naylor, T.D. 2002. What's With the E in Democracy? A Critical Exploration of Democratic Participation, Policy Formulation and Information-Communication Technologies (ICTs). Master's thesis, Department of Sociology and Social Anthropology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS.
Nevitte, N. 1996. The Decline of Deference: Canadian Value Change in Cross-National Perspective. Broadview Press: Peterborough, Ontario.
Nicol, J., A.A. Shea, G.J.P. Simmens and R.A. Sims, eds. 1954. Canada's Farm Radio Forum. Paris: UNESCO.
Opoku, A.A., ed. An African Experiment in Radio Forums for Rural Development: Ghana 1964/1965. Paris: UNESCO, pp. 22–70.
Phillips, S. and M. Orsini. 2002. Mapping the Links: Citizen Involvement in Policy Processes. Ottawa: Canadian Policy Research Networks.
Putnam, R.D. 2000. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. Toronto: Simon & Schuster.
Price, M.E. 1995. Television, the Public Sphere and National Identity. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
Raboy, M. 1990. Missed Opportunities: The Story of Canada's Broadcasting Policy. Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press.
Rheingold, H. 1994. The Virtual Community: Homesteading on the Electronic Frontier. New York: Harper Collins Publishing.
Rice, J.J. and M.J. Prince. 2001. Changing Politics of Canadian Social Policy. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Saul, J.R. 2001. On Equilibrium. Toronto: Penguin Group.
Schwass, R. 1993. Morningside, 50th Anniversary of the Farm Radio Forum. CBC Radio. June 18.
Sciadas, G. 2002. “Unveiling the Digital Divide.” Connectedness Series.
Statistics Canada 2001, (October) catalogue no. 56F0004MIE, no. 7; available online at the Statistics Canada Web site, at http://www.statcan.ca/cgi-bin/downpub/listpub.cgi?catno=56F0004MIE2002007
Shea, A. 1963. Broadcasting the Canadian Way. Ottawa: Runge Press.
Siegel, A. 1982. Politics and the Media in Canada. Toronto: McGraw-Hill Ryerson Ltd.
Sim, R.A. 2004. “The Farm Forum Story.” Article published by the Don Snowden Program, hosted by the School of Environmental Design and Rural Development at the University of Guelph; available online at the program's Web site, http://www.uoguelph.ca/∼snowden/frf_story, site last accessed October 12, 2004.
Slouka, M. 1995. War of the Worlds: Cyberspace and the High-tech Assault on Reality. New York: Basic Books.
Splichal, S. and J. Wasko, eds. 1993. Communication and Democracy. New Jersey: Ablex Publishing.
Statistics Canada. 2001. “General Social Survey: Internet Use.” The Daily, March 26.
Stein, J.G. 2001. The Cult of Efficiency. Toronto: Anansi Press.
Sterling, B. 1992. The Hacker Crackdown: Law and Disorder on the Electronic Frontier. London: Viking Publishing.
Strate, L., R. Jacobson and S.B. Gibson, eds. 1996. Communication Cyberspace: Social Interaction in an Electronic Environment. New Jersey: Hampton Press.
Trist, E.L. 1983. “Referent organizations and the development of inter-organizational domains.” Human Relations 36(3): 269–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weir, E. Austin. 1965. The Struggle for National Broadcasting in Canada. Toronto: McClelland and Stewart Ltd.
Wilson, I. 1980. Citizens' Forum: Canada's National Platform. Monograph for the Department of Adult Education. Toronto: Ontario Institute for Studies in Education
Wyman, M., D. Shulman and L. Ham. 1999. “Learning to Engage: Experiences with Civic Engagement in Canada.” Citizens and Governance: Civil Society in the New Millennium. Ottawa: Canadian Policy Research Networks, Inc., pp. 75–76
Yankelovich, D. 1999. The Magic of Dialogue. New York: Simon & Schuster.