Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T14:29:23.804Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Elephants of a Feather? The Role of ‘Justice’ in Canadian and American Cold War Military Interventions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 July 2005

Michael J. Butler
Michael J. Butler
Affiliation:
East Carolina University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Abstract. The polities of Canada and the United States are purportedly engaged in the process of value convergence; however, with regard to the legitimacy of foreign military intervention, divergence seems a more apt characterization. This research explores whether the current discord between Canada and the US reflects an aberration, or a realization of entrenched normative differences, over what justifies the use of military force. A series of regression models tests the hypothesis that justice considerations prompted the military interventions of both the US and Canada during the Cold War. The results herein fail to confirm this hypothesis, and in the process highlight the ways in which each country employed ‘justice’ selectively in the service of broader foreign policy objectives.

Résumé. Les constitutions politiques des États-Unis et du Canada sont supposées tendre vers des valeurs communes; cependant, en ce qui concerne la reconnaissance de la légitimité des interventions militaires à l'étranger, la divergence semble être une caractérisation plus juste. Cette recherche explore si le désaccord actuel entre les États-Unis et le Canada reflète une certaine aberration ou la réalisation de différences profondément ancrées, concernant la justification de l'utilisation de la force militaire. Une série de modèles régressifs teste l'hypothèse selon laquelle des considérations de justice ont provoqué les interventions militaires des États-Unis et du Canada durant la guerre froide. Les résultats infirment cette hypothèse, et soulignent, en même temps, les façons dont chacun des deux pays a employé la “ justice ” de manière sélective pour servir des objectifs plus vastes de politique extérieure.

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique , Volume 38 , Issue 1 , March 2005 , pp. 101 - 127
Copyright
© 2005 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aquinas, Thomas. 1952. Summa Theologica, translated and revised by Father Daniel J. Sullivan. Chicago: Encyclopedia Britannica.
Augustine, Bishop of Hippo. 1963. The City of God, abridged and translated by J.W.C. Wand. London: Oxford University Press.
Axworthy, Thomas S. 1990. “‘To Stand Not So High Perhaps but Always Alone’: The Foreign Policy of Pierre Elliott Trudeau.” In Towards a Just Society: The Trudeau Years, eds. Thomas S. Axworthy and Pierre Elliot Trudeau. Markham, Ont.: Viking Press.
Bercovitch, Jacob and Richard Jackson. 1997. International Conflict: A Chronological Encyclopedia of Conflicts and their Management, 1945–1995. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly, Inc.
Blanchette, Arthur E. 1977. Canadian Foreign Policy 1955–1965: Selected Speeches and Documents. Ottawa: Carleton Library.
Brecher, Michael and Jonathan Wilkenfeld. 1989. Crisis, Conflict, and Instability. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Brecher, Michael and Jonathan Wilkenfeld. 2000. A Study of Crisis. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Carment, David and Dane Rowlands. 1998. “Three's Company: Evaluating Third Party Intervention in Intrastate Conflict.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 42(4): 572–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carment, David and Patrick James. 1996. “Toward a Model of Interstate Ethnic Conflict: Evidence from the Balkans War and the Indo-Sri Lankan Conflict.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 29: 521–554.Google Scholar
Carment, David. 1994. “Canada, the United Nations, and Peacemaking: The Management and Resolution of Ethnic Conflict, 1945–>1988.” In Canada and the Changing International Arena, eds. S. Ederberg and T. Martimianakis. Waterloo, ON: University of Waterloo Press.
Chapnick, Adam. 2000. “The Canadian Middle Power Myth.” International Journal 55(2): 188–206.Google Scholar
Chicago Council on Foreign Relations (with the German Marshall Fund of the United States). 2002. Worldviews 2002: A Survey of American and European Attitudes and Public Opinion on Foreign Policy. Available online at the Worldviews Web site, at http://www.worldviews.org/index.html, site last accessed August 26, 2004.
Chicago Council on Foreign Relations. 1999. American Public Opinion & U.S. Foreign Policy. Available online at the council's Web site, at http://www.ccfr.org/publications/opinion/American Public Opinion Report 1999.pdf, site last accessed September 7, 2004.
Cooper, Andrew F. 1997. Canadian Foreign Policy: Old Habits and New Directions. Scarborough: Prentice-Hall.
Fousek, John. 2000. To Lead the Free World: American Nationalism and the Cultural Roots of the Cold War. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
Gaffen, Fred. 1987. In the Eye of the Storm: A History of Canadian Peacekeeping. Toronto: Deneau & Wayne.
Granatstein, J.L., ed. 1986. Canadian Foreign Policy: Historical Readings. Toronto: Copp Clark Pitman Ltd.
Hayes, Geoffrey. 1997. “Canada as a Middle Power: The Case of Peacekeeping.” In Niche Diplomacy: Middle Powers after the Cold War, ed. Andrew F. Cooper. New York: St. Martin's.
Holmes, John W. 1970. The Better Part of Valour: Essays on Canadian Diplomacy. Toronto: McClelland and Steward, Ltd.
Hunt, Michael H. 1987. Ideology and U.S. Foreign Policy. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Huth, Paul. 1998. “Major Power Intervention in International Crises, 1918–1988.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 42: 744–769.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inglehart, Ronald, Neil Nevitte and Miguel Basañez. 1996. The North American Trajectory: Cultural, Economic, and Political Ties among the United States, Canada, and Mexico. New York: Aldine de Gruvter.
Johnson, James Turner. 1999. Morality and Contemporary Warfare. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Lepgold, Joseph and Timothy J. McKeown. 1995. “Is American Foreign Policy Exceptional? An Empirical Analysis.” Political Science Quarterly 110 (3): 369–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lu, Catherine. 2002. “Justice and Moral Regeneration: Lessons from the Treaty of Versailles.” International Studies Review 4(3): 3–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luttwak, Edward N. 1995. “Toward Post-Heroic Warfare.” Foreign Affairs 74(3): 115–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melakopides, Costas. 1998. Pragmatic Idealism: Canadian Foreign Policy 1945–1995. Montreal: McGill Queen's University Press.
Morton, Desmond. 1982. Canada and War: A Military and Political History. Toronto: Butterworths.
Munton, D. and T. Keating. 2001. “Internationalism and the Canadian Public.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 34(3): 517–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Conference of Catholic Bishops. 1983. The Challenge of Peace: God's Promise and our Response. Washington, DC: United States Catholic Conference, Inc.
O'Brien, William V. 1979. U.S. Military Intervention: Law and Morality. Washington, DC: The Center for Strategic and International Studies, Georgetown University.
Payne, Richard J. 1995. The Clash with Distant Cultures: Values, Interests, and Force in American Foreign Policy. Albany: SUNY Press.
Pearson, Geoffrey A.H. 1993. Seize the Day: Lester B. Pearson and Crisis Diplomacy. Ottawa: Carleton University Press.
Phillips, Richard L. 1984. War and Justice. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press.
Ramsey, Paul. 1968. The Just War: Force and Political Responsibility. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
Rigby, Andrew. 2001. Justice and Reconciliation: After the Violence. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.
Rosen, Stephen P. 1982. “Vietnam and the American Theory of Limited War.” International Security 7(2): 83–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenau, James N. 1969. “Intervention as a Scientific Concept.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 12(2): 149–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rourke, John T., Ralph G. Carter and Mark A. Boyer. 1996. Making American Foreign Policy. Second edition. Guilford, CT: Dushkin/McGraw-Hill.
Russett, Bruce M. and Harvey Starr. 1992. World Politics: The Menu for Choice. Fourth edition. New York: W.H. Freeman and Company.
The Gallup Organization. 1991. The Gallup Poll Monthly, February 1991 (no. 305). Princeton, N.J.: The Gallup Poll Organization.
Tillema, Herbert K. 1991. International Armed Conflict since 1945: A Bibliographic Handbook of Wars and Military Interventions. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Trumbore, Peter F. and Mark A. Boyer. 2000. “International Crisis Decisionmaking as a Two-Level Process.” Journal of Peace Research 37(6): 679–697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walzer, Michael. 1977. Just and Unjust Wars: A Moral Argument with Historical Illustrations. New York: HarperCollins.
Welch, David A. 1993. Justice and the Genesis of War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Yoon, M.Y. 1997. “Explaining U.S. Intervention in Third World Internal Wars, 1945–1989.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 41: 580–603.Google Scholar