Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T14:19:35.511Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Instrumental Philanthropy: Trade and the Allocation of Foreign Aid

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 September 2010

Erik Lundsgaarde ,
Christian Breunig  and
Aseem Prakash
Erik Lundsgaarde*
Affiliation:
German Development Institute
Christian Breunig*
Affiliation:
University of Toronto
Aseem Prakash*
Affiliation:
University of Washington
*
Erik Lundsgaarde, German Development Institute, Tulpenfeld 6, D-53113, BonnGermany.
Christian Breunig, University of Toronto, Department of Political Science, Sidney Hall, Room 3018, 100 George Street, Toronto, Ontario M55 363, Canada.
Aseem Prakash, University of Washington, Department of Political Science, Box 353530, Seattle, WA 98195-3530, USA.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Abstract. “Trade, not aid” has long been a catchphrase in international development discourse. This paper evaluates whether the “trade, not aid” logic has driven bilateral aid allocations in practice. Using a dataset that covers development assistance from 22 donor countries to 187 aid recipients from 1980 to 2002, we find that donor countries have dispersed bilateral aid in ways that reinforce their extant bilateral commercial ties with recipient countries. Instead of “trade, not aid,” bilateral aid disbursement has followed the logic of “aid following trade.” The policy implication is that bilateral aid allocation patterns have reinforced the disadvantages of poor countries that have a limited ability to participate in international trade due to a variety of factors such as geography and a lack of tradable resources.

Résumé. «Le commerce et non l'aide» est un slogan qui continue d'occuper une place importante dans le débat sur le développement international. L'article qui suit vise à évaluer la mise en pratique de ce principe dans les allocations de l'aide bilatérale. S'appuyant sur une base de données recouvrant l'aide distribuée par 22 pays donateurs à 187 pays récipiendaires entre 1980 et 2002, notre analyse révèle que l'aide a été allouée en fonction des liens commerciaux bilatéraux existants et les a renforcés. C'est donc le principe de «l'aide après le commerce» qui a prévalu. Les allocations d'aide bilatérale ont ainsi aggravé les désavantages des pays pauvres dont la capacité à bénéficier du commerce international est limitée en raison de divers facteurs, dont la situation géographique et le manque de ressources marchandes.

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique , Volume 43 , Issue 3 , September 2010 , pp. 733 - 761
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Political Science Association 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alesina, Alberto and Dollar, David. 2000. “Who Gives Foreign Aid to Whom and Why?” Journal of Economic Growth 5 (1): 33–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alesina, Alberto and Weder, Beatrice. 2002. “Do Corrupt Governments Receive Less Foreign Aid?” The American Economic Review 92 (4): 1126–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, James A. 1979. “A Theoretical Foundation for the Gravity Equation.” The American Economic Review 69 (1): 106–16.Google Scholar
Arellano, Manuel. 2003. Panel Data Econometrics. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arellano, Manuel and Bond, Stephen. 1991. “Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data.” Review of Economic Studies 58 (2): 277–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, Nathaniel and Katz, Jonathan N.. 1995. “What to Do (and Not to Do) with Time-Series Cross-Section Data.” American Political Science Review 89 (3): 634–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergstrand, Jeffrey H. 1985. “The Gravity Equation in International Trade: Some Microeconomic Foundations and Empirical Evidence.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 67 (3): 474–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berthélemy, Jean-Claude. 2006. “Bilateral Donors' Interest v. Recipients' Development Motives in Aid Allocation: Do All Donors Behave the Same?” Review of Development Economics 10 (2): 179–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boone, Peter. 1996. “Politics and the Effectiveness of Foreign Aid.” European Economic Review 40 (2): 269–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burnside, Craig and Dollar, David. 2000. “Aid, Policies, and Growth.” American Economic Review 90 (4): 847–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Central Intelligence Agency. 2005. CIA World Factbook. http://www.cia.gov/factbook (Accessed May 2005).Google Scholar
Cingranelli, David L. and Pasquarello, Thomas E.. 1985. “Human Rights Practices and the Distribution of US Foreign Aid to Latin American Countries.” American Journal of Political Science 29(3): 539–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collier, Paul and Dollar, David. 2004. “Development Effectiveness: What Have We Learnt?” The Economic Journal 114 (June): F244–F271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Correlates of War Project. 2005. State System Membership List, v. 2004.1. Online, http://correlatesofwar.org (Accessed October 2005).Google Scholar
Dollar, David and Pritchett, Lant. 1998. Assessing Aid: What Works, What Doesn't, and Why. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dowling, J.M. and Hiemenz, U.. 1985. “Biases in the Allocation of Foreign Aid: Some New Evidence.” World Development 13 (4): 535–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dudley, Leonard, and Montmarquette, Claude. 1976. “A Model of the Supply of Bilateral Foreign Aid.” The American Economic Review 66 (1): 132–42.Google Scholar
Dunning, Thad. 2004. “Conditioning the Effects of Aid: Cold War Politics, Donor Credibility, and Democracy in Africa.” International Organization 58 (2): 409–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Easterly, William. 2003. “Can Foreign Aid Buy Growth?” The Journal of Economic Perspectives 17 (3): 23–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Easterly, William. 2006. “The Big Push Déjà Vu: A Review of Jeffrey Sachs's ‘The End of Poverty: Economic Possibilities for Our Time.’” Journal of Economic Literature 44 (1): 96–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Financial Times. 2006. “Friend or Forager? How China is Winning the Resources and the Loyalties of Africa.” February 23, 15.Google Scholar
Fleck, Robert K. and Kilby, Christopher. 2006. “How Do Political Changes Influence US Bilateral Aid Allocations? Evidence from Panel Data.” Review of Development Economics 10 (2): 210–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freedom House. 2005. Freedom in the World Country Ratings: 1972–2004. http://www.freedomhouse.org/ratings/index.htm (Accessed May 2005).Google Scholar
Gibler, Douglas M. and Sarkees, Meredith. 2004. “Measuring Alliances: the Correlates of War Formal Interstate Alliance Data Set 1816–2000.” Journal of Peace Research 44 (2): 211–22.American Countries.” American Journal of Political Science 29 (3): 539–63.Google Scholar
Gibson, Clark C., Andersson, Krister, Ostrom, Elinor and Shivakumar, Sujai. 2005. The Samaritan's Dilemma: The Political Economy of Development Aid. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, Pinelopi Koujianou and Pavcnik, Nina. 2007. “Distributional Effects of Globalization in Developing Countries.” Journal of Economic Literature 45 (1): 39–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldsmith, Arthur. 2001. “Foreign Aid and Statehood in Africa.” International Organization 55 (1): 123–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gounder, Rakmani. 1994. “Empirical Results of Aid Motivations: Australia's Bilateral Aid Program.” World Development 22 (1): 99–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, Henrik and Tarp, Finn. 2001. “Aid and Growth Regressions.” Journal of Development Economics 64 (2): 547–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heckman, James. 1976. “The Common Structure of Statistical Models of Truncation, Sample Selection and Limited Dependent.” Annals of Economic and Social Measurement 5(4): 475–92.Google Scholar
Heckman, James J. 1979. “Sample Selection Bias as a Specification Error.” Econometrica 47 (1): 153–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
International Monetary Fund. 2003. Direction of Trade Statistics. CD-Rom.Washington DC: IMF.Google Scholar
Isenman, P. 1976. “Biases in Aid Allocations against Poorer and Larger Countries.” World Development 4 (8): 631–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahn, Joseph. 2006. “China Courts Africa, Angling for Strategic Gains.” New York Times, November 3, http://www.nytimes.com.Google Scholar
Kosack, Stephen. 2003. “Effective Aid: How Democracy Allows Development Aid to Improve the Quality of Life.” World Development 31 (1): 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kosack, Stephen and Tobin, Jennifer. 2006. “Funding Self-Sustaining Development: The Role of Aid, FDI and Government in Economic Success.” International Organization 60 (1): 205–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krueger, Anne O. 1997. “Trade Policy and Economic Development: How We Learn.” The American Economic Review 87 (1): 1–22.Google Scholar
Lewis, Tammy L. 2003. “Environmental Aid: Driven by Recipient Need or Donor Interests?” Social Science Quarterly 84 (1): 144–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lumsdaine, David Halloran. 1993. Moral Vision in International Politics: The Foreign Aid Regime 1949–1989. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maizels, Alfred and Nissanke, Machiko K.. 1984. “Motivations for Aid to Developing Countries.” World Development 12 (9): 879–900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, Monty G. and Jaggers, Keith. 2002. Polity IV Data Set. Computer file; version p4v2002. College Park, MD: Center for International Development and Conflict Management, University of Maryland.Google Scholar
Martin, Guy. 1989. “Uranium: A Case Study in Franco-African Relations.” The Journal of Modern African Studies 27 (4): 625–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGillavray, Mark and Morrissey, Oliver. 1998. “Aid and Trade Relationships in East Asia.” The World Economy 22 (7): 981–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKeown, Timothy J. 1991. “A Liberal Trade Order? The Long-Run Pattern of Imports to the Advanced Capitalist States.” International Studies Quarterly 35 (2): 151–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKinlay, R.D. and Little, R.. 1977. “A Foreign Policy Model of US Bilateral Aid Allocation.” World Politics 30 (1): 58–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meernik, James, Krueger, Eric L. and Poe, Steven C.. 1998. “Testing Models of US Foreign Policy: Foreign Aid During and After the Cold War.” The Journal of Politics 60 (1): 63–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milner, Helen. 1988. “Trading Places: Industries for Free Trade.” World Politics 40 (3): 350–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neumayer, Eric. 2003. The Pattern of Aid Giving. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). 2002. Development Cooperation Report: Efforts and Policies of the Members of the Development Assistance Committee. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). 2004a. Geographical Distribution of Financial Flows Part I (Developing Countries). http://www.sourceoecd.org (Accessed April 2005).Google Scholar
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). 2004b. Geographical Distribution of Financial Flows Part II (Countries in Transition). http://www.sourceoecd.org (Accessed April 2005).Google Scholar
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). 2007. Development Cooperation Report: Efforts and Policies of the Members of the Development Assistance Committee. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). 2009. International Development Statistics Online. http://www.oecd.org/dac/stats/idsonline (June 11, 2009).Google Scholar
Osei, Robert, Morrissey, Oliver and Lloyd, Tim. 2004. “The Nature of Aid and Trade Relationships.” European Journal of Development Research 16 (2): 354–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petiteville, Franck. 1996. “Quatre Décennies de ‘Coopération Franco-Africaine’: Usages et Usures d'un Clientélisme.” Révue Études Internationales 27 (3): 571–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poe, Steven C. and Meernik, James. 1995. “US Military Aid in the 1980s: A Global Analysis.” Journal of Peace Research 32 (4): 399–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pratt, Cranford. 1989. Internationalism under Strain: The North-South Policies of Canada, the Netherlands, Norway, and Sweden. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ravaillon, Martin. 2006. “Beyond Averages in the Trade and Poverty Debate.” World Development 34 (8): 1374–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reed, Michael C. 1987. “Gabon: A Neo-Colonial Enclave of Enduring French Interest.” The Journal of Modern African Studies 25(2): 283–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodrik, Dani. 2006. “Goodbye Washington Consensus, Hello Washington Confusion? A Review of the World Bank's Economic Growth in the 1990s: Learning from a Decade of Reform.” Journal of Economic Literature 44 (4): 973–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sartori, Anne E. 2003. “An Estimator for Some Binary-Outcome Selection Models without Exclusion Restrictions.” Political Analysis 11 (2): 111–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schraeder, Peter J., Hook, Steven W. and Taylor, Bruce. 1998. “Clarifying the Foreign Aid Puzzle: A Comparison of American, Japanese, French, and Swedish Aid Flows.” World Politics 50 (2): 294–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stokke, Olav. M., ed. 1989. Western Middle Powers and Global Poverty: the Determinants of the Aid Policies of Canada, Denmark, the Netherlands, Norway, and Sweden. Uppsala: Scandinavian Institute of African Studies.Google Scholar
Tull, Dennis M. 2006. “China's Engagement in Africa: Scope, Significance, and Consequences.” The Journal of Modern African Studies 44 (3): 459–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD). 1998. World Investment Report. Geneva: UNCTAD.Google Scholar
United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD). 2007. Handbook of Statistics. http://stats.unctad.org/handbook (Accessed January 2008).Google Scholar
USDA. 2004. Distance between Capital Cities. http://www.wcrl.ars.usda.gov/cec/moregen.htm (April 15, 2004).Google Scholar
Ward, Michael D. 2007. Maximum Likelihood for Social Sciences Strategies for Analysis. faculty.washington.edu/mdw/pdfs/SLM.pdf (June 20, 2009).Google Scholar
Williamson, John. 1993. “Democracy and the ‘Washington Consensus.’” World Development 21 (8): 1329–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winters, L. Alan. 2004. “Trade Liberalisation and Economic Performance: An Overview.” Economic Journal 114: F4–F21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winters, L. Alan. 2006. “International Trade and Poverty: Cause or Cure?” Australian Economic Review 39 (4): 347–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, Robert E. 1986. From Marshall Plan to Debt Crisis: Foreign Aid and Development Choices in the World Economy. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Wooldridge, Jeffrey. 2002. Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
World Bank. 2005a. World Development Indicators Online. http://devdata.worldbank.org/dataonline (Accessed June 2005).Google Scholar
World Bank. 2005b. World Development Report 2005: A Better Investment Climate for Everyone. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar