Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T22:04:04.142Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Conceptions of Political Representation in Canada: An Explanation of Public Opinion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 December 2005

Cameron D. Anderson  and
Elizabeth Goodyear-Grant
Cameron D. Anderson
Affiliation:
Queen's University and McGill University
Elizabeth Goodyear-Grant
Affiliation:
McGill University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Abstract. Despite widespread attention paid to issues of representation, how Canadians think and feel about different facets of representation are inadequately documented and understood. Using data from the 2000 Canadian Election Study (CES), the article addresses this dearth of systematic research through an examination of popularly held attitudes toward three dimensions of political representation: direct versus representative democracy, the role of the elected representative and territorial versus non-territorial bases of substantive representation. Particular attention is paid to the impact of political knowledge and the individualist/collectivist value cleavage on representational preferences. Results are discussed in light of current debates regarding institutional and representational change in Canada.

Résumé. En dépit de l'attention portée aux enjeux de la représentation, les sentiments et les idées des Canadiens par rapport aux différents aspects de la représentation sont mal documentés et compris. Cet article emploie les données de l'Étude électorale canadienne (ÉÉC) et cherche à combler cette lacune en examinant les attitudes populaires par rapport à trois dimensions de la représentation politique : la démocratie directe versus représentative, le rôle du représentant élu, et les bases de représentation territoriales versus non-territoriales. Nous accordons une attention particulière aux répercussions du niveau de connaissances politiques et des valeurs individualistes ou collectivistes sur les préférences en matière de représentation. Les résultats sont examinés à la lumière des débats récents sur le renouveau institutionnel et les modifications de la représentation au Canada.

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique , Volume 38 , Issue 4 , December 2005 , pp. 1029 - 1058
Copyright
© 2005 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Achen, Christopher H. 1982. Interpreting and Using Regression. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Adamson, Agar and Ian Stewart. 2001. “Changing Party Politics in Atlantic Canada.” In Party Politics in Canada, eighth edition, eds. Hugh G. Thorburn and Alan Whitehorn. Toronto: Prentice Hall.
Althaus, Scott L. 1998. “Information Effects in Collective Preferences.” American Political Science Review 92: 545–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ball, Terence and Richard Dagger. 1995. Political Ideologies and the Democratic Ideal, second edition. New York: HarperCollins.
Barber, Benjamin. 1974. The Death of Communal Liberty. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Beck, J. Murray. 1981. “An Atlantic Region Political Culture: A Chimera.” In Eastern and Western Perspectives, eds. D.J. Bercuson and P.A. Buckner. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Blais, André and Elisabeth Gidengil. 1991. Making Representative Democracy Work: The Views of Canadians. Toronto and Ottawa: Dundurn Press and Royal Commission on Electoral Reform and Party Financing.
Bowler, Shaun, Todd Donovan and Caroline J. Tolbert, eds. 1998. Citizens as Legislators: Direct Democracy in the United States. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press.
Bryan, Frank. 2004. Real Democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Burt, Sandra. 1986. “Different Democracies? A Preliminary Examination of the Political Worlds of Canadian Men and Women.” Women & Politics 6: 57–79.Google Scholar
Campbell, Angus, Philip E. Converse, Warren E. Miller and Donald E. Stokes. 1960. The American Voter. New York: Wiley.
Campbell, Colin and William Christian. 1996. Parties, Leaders, and Ideologies in Canada. Toronto: McGraw-Hill Ryerson.
Converse, Philip E. 1964. “The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics.” In Ideology and Discontent, ed. David E. Apter. New York: Free Press.
Dalton, Russell. 1984. “Cognitive Mobilization and Partisan Dealignment in Advanced Industrial Democracies.” Journal of Politics 46: 264–84.Google Scholar
Dalton, Russell. 2002. Citizen Politics: Public Opinion and Political Parties in Advanced Industrial Democracies, third edition. New York: Chatham House.
Delli Carpini, Michael X. and Scott Keeter. 1993. “Measuring Political Knowledge: Putting First Things First.” American Journal of Political Science 37(4): 1179–1206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delli Carpini, Michael X. and Scott Keeter. 1996. What Americans Know About Politics and Why it Matters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Diggs, B.J. 1968. “Practical Representation.” In Representation, eds. J. Roland Pennock and John W. Chapman. New York: Atherton Press.
Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Wiley.
Elkins, David and Richard Simeon. 1980. Small Worlds: Provinces and Parties in Canadian Political Life. Toronto: Methuen.
Fiorina, Morris. 1981. Retrospective Voting in American National Elections. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Fiske, Susan T., Richard R. Lau and Richard A. Smith. 1990. “On the Varieties and Utilities of Political Expertise.” Social Cognition 8: 31–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fournier, Patrick. 2002. “The Uninformed Canadian Voter.” In Citizen Politics: Research and Theory in Canadian Political Behaviour, eds. Joanna Everitt and Brenda O'Neill. Don Mills, ON: Oxford University Press.
Gallagher, Michael and Pier Vincenzo Uleri, eds. 1996. The Referendum Experience in Europe. London: Macmillan.
Gidengil, Elisabeth. 1996. “Gender and Attitudes Towards Quotas for Women Candidates in Canada.” Women and Politics 16(4): 21–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gidengil, Elisabeth, André Blais, Neil Nevitte and Richard Nadeau. 2004. Citizens. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.
Gidengil, Elisabeth, Elizabeth Goodyear-Grant, André Blais and Neil Nevitte. Publication forthcoming. “Gender, Knowledge and Social Capital.” In Gender and Social Capital, eds. Brenda O'Neill and Elisabeth Gidengil. New York: Routledge.
Gilligan, Carol. 1982. In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women's Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Hartz, Louis. 1955. The Liberal Tradition in America. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World.
Hartz, Louis. 1964. The Founding of New Societies. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World.
Hibbing, John R. and Elizabeth Theiss-Morse. 2001. “Process Space and American Politics.” American Political Science Review 95: 145–53.Google Scholar
Hibbing, John R. and Elizabeth Theiss-Morse. 2002. Stealth Democracy: Americans' Beliefs About How Government Should Work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Horowitz, Gad. 1966. “Conservatism, Liberalism and Socialism in Canada: An Interpretation.” Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science 32: 143–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howe, Paul. 2001. “The Sources of Campaign Intemperance.” Policy Options January/February: 21–4.Google Scholar
Howe, Paul and David Northrup. 2000. “Strengthening Canadian Democracy: The Views of Canadians.” Policy Matters 1(5).Google Scholar
Inglehart, Ronald. 1990. Culture Shift in Advanced Industrial Society. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Inglehart, Ronald. 1997. Modernization and Postmodernization: Cultural, Economic, and Political Change in 43 Societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Johnston, Richard, André Blais, Elisabeth Gidengil and Neil Nevitte. 1996. The Challenge of Direct Democracy: The 1992 Canadian Referendum. Montreal and Kingston: McGill-Queen's University Press.
Krosnick, Jon A. and Michael A. Milburn. 1990. “Psychological Determinants of Political Opinionation.” Social Cognition 8: 49–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lambert, Ronald E., James E. Curtis, Barry J. Kay and Steven D. Brown. 1988. “The Social Sources of Political Knowledge.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 21(2): 359–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laycock, David. 1990. Populism and Democratic Thought in the Canadian Prairies, 1910 to 1945. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Laycock, David. 2002. The New Right and Democracy in Canada. Toronto: Oxford University Press.
Laycock, David, ed. 2004. Representation and Democratic Theory. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.
Lipset, Seymour Martin. 1950. Agrarian Socialism: The Cooperative Commonwealth Federation in Saskatchewan: A Study in Political Sociology. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Lewis-Beck, Michael. 1980. Applied Regression: An Introduction. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Lupia, Arthur and Mathew McCubbins. 1998. The Democratic Dilemma: Can Citizens Learn What They Need to Know? Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Luskin, Robert C. 1987. “Measuring Political Sophistication.” American Journal of Political Science 31: 856–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luskin, Robert C. 1995. “Political Psychology, Political Behaviour, and Politics: Questions of Aggregation, Causal Distance, and Taste.” In Political Psychology and Political Behaviour, ed. James H. Kuklinski. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Luskin, Robert C. and John Bullock. 2004. “Re(:)Measuring Political Sophistication.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, IL, April 14–18.
Mansbridge, Jane. 2003. “Rethinking Representation.” American Political Science Review 97(4): 515–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mendelsohn, Matthew and Fred Cutler. 2000. “The Effect of Referendums on Democratic Citizens: Information, Politicization, Efficacy and Tolerance.” British Journal of Political Science 30: 685–701.Google Scholar
Mendelsohn, Matthew and Andrew Parkin. 2001a. “Introducing Direct Democracy in Canada.” Choices 7(5): 3–35.Google Scholar
Mendelsohn, Matthew and Andrew Parkin, eds. 2001b. Referendum Democracy: Citizens, Elites and Deliberation in Referendum Campaigns. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Milner, Henry, ed. 1999. Making Every Vote Count. Peterborough, ON: Broadview.
Nevitte, Neil. 1996. The Decline of Deference: Canadian Value Change in Cross-National Perspective. Peterborough, ON: Broadview.
O'Neill, Brenda. 2001. “Generational Patterns in the Political Opinions and Behaviour of Canadians.” Policy Matters 2(5): 1–48.Google Scholar
O'Neill, Brenda. 2002. “Sugar and Spice? Political Culture and the Political Behaviour of Canadian Women.” In Citizen Politics: Research and Theory in Canadian Political Behaviour, eds. Joanna Everitt and Brenda O'Neill. Don Mills, ON: Oxford University Press.
Pitkin, Hanna. 1967. The Concept of Representation. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
Popkin, Samuel. 1991. The Reasoning Voter. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Riker, William H. 1982. Liberalism Against Populism: A Confrontation Between the Theory of Democracy and the Theory of Social Choice. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland.
Sartori, Giovanni. 1987. The Theory of Democracy Revisited. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.
Setälä, Maija. 1999. “Referendums in Western Europe—A Wave of Direct Democracy?” Scandinavian Political Studies 22(4): 327–40.Google Scholar
Sniderman, Paul M., Richard A. Brody and Philip E. Tetlock,_et_al. 1991. Reasoning and Choice: Explorations in Political Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
van Deth, Jan and Elinor Scarbrough, eds. 1995. The Impact of Values. New York: Oxford University Press.
Verba, Sidney, Nancy Burns and Kay Lehman Schlozman. 1997. “Knowing and Caring About Politics: Gender and Political Engagement.” The Journal of Politics 59(4): 1051–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vickers, Jill, ed. 1988. Getting Things Done: Women's Views of their Involvement in Political Life. Ottawa: Canadian Research Institute for the Advancement of Women.
Warren, Mark E. 2004. “What Can Democratic Participation Mean Today?” In Representation and Democratic Theory, ed. David Laycock. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.
Weber, Max. 1978. Economy and Society. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Wiseman, Nelson. 1996. “Provincial Political Cultures.” In Provinces: Canadian Provincial Politics, ed. Christopher Dunn. Peterborough: Broadview Press.
Wiseman, Nelson. 2001. “The Pattern of Prairie Politics.” In Party Politics in Canada, eighth edition, eds. Hugh G. Thorburn and Alan Whitehorn. Toronto: Prentice Hall.
Zaller, John. 1990. “Political Awareness, Elite Opinion Leadership, and the Mass Survey Response.” Social Cognition 8: 125–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaller, John. 1992. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.