Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T14:02:04.990Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

From Kyoto to the WTO: Evaluating the Constitutional Legitimacy of the Provinces in Canadian Foreign Trade and Environmental Policy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 July 2005

Christopher J. Kukucha
Christopher J. Kukucha
Affiliation:
University of Lethbridge
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Abstract. The Kyoto Protocol was a controversial issue within Canadian federalism, especially in Alberta, where the province considered a formal constitutional challenge regarding the implementation of the agreement. This option was not pursued, however, due to existing judicial precedent that limits the jurisdictional authority of the provinces in international affairs. Regardless, these rulings still suggest a level of constitutional ambiguity, which creates motivation for federal-provincial cooperation on foreign trade and environmental policy. As a result, highly valued formalized consultative mechanisms have developed in these issue areas during the past two decades. Ottawa's decision to ratify Kyoto, however, represented a significant departure from previous practices of cooperative federalism. In pursuing the protocol as part of his legacy agenda, Chrétien was aware of the provinces' tenuous constitutional status. It is important to note, however, that the resulting tension between both levels of government was atypical and does not threaten the viability of cooperative federalism in the near future.

Résumé. Le protocole de Kyoto a suscité de nombreuses controverses au sein du fédéralisme canadien, en particulier en Alberta où le gouvernement songea même à contester formellement la constitutionnalité de sa mise en oeuvre. En définitive, il a abandonné cette option en raison de précédents jurisprudentiels qui limitent la juridiction des provinces en affaires internationales. Ces décisions suggèrent néanmoins qu'il existe un certain niveau d'ambiguïté constitutionnelle propre à motiver une attitude de coopération fédérale-provinciale en matière d'environnement et de commerce extérieur. De ce fait, des mécanismes consultatifs très structurés ont été mis au point dans ces domaines au cours des deux dernières décennies. Or, la décision d'Ottawa de ratifier Kyoto contrastait nettement avec les pratiques antérieures de fédéralisme coopératif. En cherchant à faire du Protocole de Kyoto un élément de son héritage, Chrétien était conscient de la fragilité des arguments constitutionnels des provinces. Cependant, il est important de noter que la tension ainsi créée entre les deux niveaux de gouvernement était atypique et qu'elle ne menace pas la validité du fédéralisme coopératif dans l'avenir.

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique , Volume 38 , Issue 1 , March 2005 , pp. 129 - 152
Copyright
© 2005 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baier, Gerald. 2002. “Judicial Review and Canadian Federalism.” In Canadian Federalism: Performance, Effectiveness, and Legitimacy, eds. Herman Bakvis and Grace Skogstad. Don Mills, Ontario: Oxford University Press.
Bhagwati, Jagdish. 2000. “On Thinking Clearly About the Linkage Between Trade and the Environment.” Environment and Development Economics 5, 4: 485–496.Google Scholar
Black, Edwin R. 1975. Divided Loyalties: Canadian Concepts of Federalism. Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press.
Boardman, Robert. 2002. “Milk-and-Potatoes Environmentalism: Canada and the Turbulent World of International Law.” In Canadian Environmental Policy: Context and Cases. 2nd ed., eds. Debora L. VanNijnatten and Robert Boardman. Don Mills, Ontario: Oxford University Press.
Brown, Douglas M. 1991. “The Evolving Role of the Provinces in Canadian Trade Policy.” In Canadian Federalism: Meeting Global Economic Challenges?, eds. Douglas M. Brown and Murray G. Smith. Kingston, Ontario: Queen's University Institute of Intergovernmental Relations.
Brown, Douglas M. 1993. “The Evolving Role of the Provinces in Canada-U.S. trade Relations.” In States and Provinces in the International Economy, eds. Douglas M. Brown and Earl H. Fry. Berkeley, California and Kingston, Ontario: Institute of Governmental Studies Press and Queen's University Institute of Intergovernmental Relations.
Cameron, Maxwell A. and Brian W. Tomlin. 2000. The Making of NAFTA: How the Deal was Done. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Canada. 2003. Taking Action on Climate Change: Climate Change Memoranda of Understanding. Available at http://www.climatechange.gc.ca/english/publications/announcement/ccmou.html; site last accessed March 16, 2004.
Delacourt, Susan. 2003. “Unlike Chrétien, Leadership Hopefuls won't Ignore Gripes from Provinces.” National Post, May 10, A8.
Doern, G. Bruce. 2002. Environment, Trade and NAFTA: A Framework Paper on Issues and Institutional Choices. Ottawa: Industry Canada.
Doern, G. Bruce and Brian W. Tomlin. 1991. Faith and Fear: The Free Trade Story. Toronto: Stoddart Publishing.
Esty, Daniel. 2001. “Bridging the Trade-Environmental Divide.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 15, 3: 113–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Funston, Bernard W. and Eugene Meehan. 1998. Canada's Constitutional Law in a Nutshell. 2nd ed. Scarborough, Ontario: Carswell.
Gillis, Charlie and Alan Toulin. 2002. “In Edmonton, In Ottawa.” National Post, November 26, A4.
Harrison, Kathryn. 1996. Passing the Buck: Federalism and Canadian Environmental Policy. Vancouver: UBC Press.
Harrison, Kathryn. 1999. “Retreat from Regulation: The Evolution of the Canadian Environmental Regime.” In Changing the Rules: Canadian Regulatory Regimes and Institutions, eds. G. Bruce Doern, Margaret M. Hill, Michael J. Prince and Richard J. Schultz. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Harrison, Kathryn. 2003. “Passing the Environmental Buck.” In New Trends in Canadian Federalism, 2nd ed., eds. Francois Rocher and Miriam Smith. Peterborough, Ontario: Broadview Press.
Hart, Michael M. 2002. A Trading Nation: Canadian Trade Policy From Colonialism to Globalization. Vancouver: UBC Press.
Hoberg, George. 2001. “Trade Harmonization and Domestic Autonomy in Environmental Policy.” Journal of Comparative Policy: Research and Practice 3, 2: 191–217.Google Scholar
Hoekman, Bernard and Michel Kostecki. 2002. The Political Economy of the World Trading System: The WTO and Beyond System. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hogg, Peter. 1997. Constitutional Law of Canada. 4th ed. Toronto: Carswell.
Hogg, Peter W. 1998. Constitutional Law of Canada: 1998 Student Edition. Scarborough Ontario: Carswell.
Lemieux, Denis and Ana Stuhec. 1999. Review of Administrative Action Under NAFTA. Scarborough, Ontario: Carswell.
McKenzie, Judith I. 2002. Environmental Politics in Canada: Managing the Commons into the Twenty First Century. Don Mills, Ontario: Oxford University Press.
Macdonald, Douglas and Heather Smith. 1999–2000. “Promises Made, Promises Broken: Questioning Canada's Commitment to Climate Change.” International Journal 55, 1: 107–24.Google Scholar
Mallory, J.H. 1971. “The Five Faces of Federalism.” In Canadian Federalism: Myth or Reality, ed. J. Peter Meekison. Toronto: Methuen.
Nossal, Kim Richard. 1997. The Politics of Canadian Foreign Policy. 3rd ed. Scarborough, Ontario: Prentice-Hall Canada.
Richards, Robert G. 1991. “The Canadian Constitution and International Economic Relations.” In Canadian Federalism: Meeting Global Economic Challenges?, eds. Douglas M. Brown and Murray G. Smith. Kingston, Ontario: Queen's University Institute of Intergovernmental Relations.
Robinson, Ian. 1993. “The NAFTA, the Side Deals, and Canadian Federalism: Constitutional Reform by Other Means.” In Canada: The State of the Federation 1993, eds. Ronald L. Watts and Douglas M. Brown. Kingston, Ontario: Queen's University Institute of Intergovernmental Relations.
Russell, Peter H., Rainer Knopff and Ted Morton. 1989. Federalism and the Charter: Leading Constitutional Decisions. Ottawa: Carleton University Press.
Saywell, John T. 2002. The Lawmakers: Judicial Powers and the Shaping of Canadian Federalism. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Simeon, Richard. 1972. Federal-Provincial Diplomacy. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Skogstad, Grace. 2002. “International Trade Policy and Canadian Federalism.” In Canadian Federalism: Performance, Effectiveness, and Legitimacy, eds. Herman Bakvis and Grace Skogstad. Don Mills Ontario: Oxford University Press.
Smiley, Donald. 1970. Constitutional Adaptation and Canadian Federalism Since 1945. Ottawa: Information Canada.
Supreme Court of Canada. Regina v. Crown Zellerbach [1988] 1 S.C.R. 401.
Supreme Court of Canada. Friends of the Oldman River Society v. Canada (Minister of Transport) [1992] 1 S.C.R. 3.
Supreme Court of Canada. Regina v. Hydro Quebec [1997] 3 S.C.R. 213.
Supreme Court of Canada. Reference Re: Firearms Act [2000] 1 S.C.R. 783.
United Nations. 1997. Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. New York: United Nations.
Urquhart, Ian. 2002. Making it Work: Kyoto, Trade and Politics. Edmonton: Parkland Institute, University of Alberta.
Valiante, Marcia. 2002. “Legal Foundations of Canadian Environmental Policy: Underlining our Values in a Shifting Landscape.” In Canadian Environmental Policy: Context and Cases, eds. Debora L. VanNijnatten and Robert Boardman. Don Mills, Ontario: Oxford University Press.
Von Glahn, Gerhard. 1996. Law Among Nations: An Introduction to Public International Law. 2nd ed. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Winfield, Mark S. 2002. “Environmental Policy and Federalism.” In Canadian Federalism: Performance, Effectiveness, and Legitimacy, eds. Herman Bakvis and Grace Skogstad. Don Mills, Ontario: Oxford University Press.