Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T14:37:10.486Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Political Foundations of Support for Same-Sex Marriage in Canada

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 December 2005

J. Scott Matthews
J. Scott Matthews
Affiliation:
University of British Columbia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Abstract. Public support for legal recognition of same-sex marriage increased markedly in Canada over the course of the 1990s. The argument of this paper is that a sequence of Supreme Court decisions in the realm of same-sex relationship recognition—and the legislative activity that followed as a result—played a pivotal role in shaping public opinion on this issue. It is argued that the impact of these institutions was twofold. First, by framing the issue as one of equal rights, the courts and legislatures induced many Canadians to weigh equality-related considerations more heavily in the formation of opinions on same-sex marriage. Second, legal recognition of same-sex relationships directly persuaded many Canadians that such recognition was legitimate. The paper uses data from the Canadian Election Studies for 1993, 1997 and 2000.

Résumé. Durant les années 1990 le soutien populaire aux mariages entre conjoints de même sexe s'est clairement renforcé. La thèse principale de cet article avance qu'une série de décisions de la Cour suprême portant sur les relations entre conjoints de même sexe, de même que les décisions adoptées par les pouvoirs législatifs en réponse à ces jugements, jouèrent un rôle crucial dans la formation de l'opinion publique sur ces questions. D'abord, en formulant le débat en termes d'égalité devant la loi, les appareils judiciaire et législatif ont amené les Canadiens à accorder plus de poids aux arguments liés à l'égalité dans leurs réflexions sur le sujet. En second lieu, la reconnaissance légale des unions entre conjoints de même sexe a persuadé les Canadiens de la légitimité de cette reconnaissance. Les conclusions de ce texte s'appuient sur les données des éditions d'Étude électorale canadienne de 1993, 1997 et 2000.

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique , Volume 38 , Issue 4 , December 2005 , pp. 841 - 866
Copyright
© 2005 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Blake, Donald. 2003. “Environmental Determinants of Racial Attitudes among White Canadians.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 36–3: 491–509.Google Scholar
Brewer, Paul. 2003a. “Values, Political Knowledge and Public Opinion about Gay Rights: A Framing-based Account.” Public Opinion Quarterly 67: 173–201.Google Scholar
Brewer, Paul. 2003b. “The Shifting Foundations of Public Opinion about Gay Rights.” Journal of Politics 65–4: 1208–1220.Google Scholar
Butler, David and Donald Stokes. 1971. Political Change in Britain. New York: St. Martin's Press.
Clark, T. and S.M. Lipset, eds. 2001. The Breakdown of Class Politics: A Debate on Post-Industrial Stratification. Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Center Press.
Druckman, James. 2001a. “On the Limits of Framing Effects: Who Can Frame?” The Journal of Politics 63–4: 1041–1066.Google Scholar
Druckman, James. 2001b. “The Implications of Framing Effects for Citizen Competence.” Political Behavior 23–3: 225–56.Google Scholar
Eckstein, Harry. 1975. “Case Study and Theory in Political Science.” In Handbook of Political Science, Vol. 7: Strategies of Inquiry, eds. F. Greenstein and N. Polsby. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Fletcher, Joseph and Paul Howe. 2000. “Public Opinion and the Courts.” Choices (IRPP) 6–3.Google Scholar
Hiebert, Janet. 2002. Charter Conflicts: What's Parliament's Role? Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press.
Inglehart, Ronald. 1997. Modernization and postmodernization: cultural, economic, and political change in 43 societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Iyengar, Shanto and Donald Kinder. 1987. News that matters: television and American opinion. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
King, Gary, Michael Tomz and Jason Wittenberg. 2000. “Making the Most of Statistical Analyses: Improving Interpretation and Presentation.” American Journal of Political Science 44–2: 347–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitschelt, Herbert. 1994. The Transformation of European Social Democracy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Knopff, Rainer and F. L. Morton, eds. 2000. The Charter Revolution and the Court Party. Peterborough, ON: Broadview Press.
Long, J. Scott. 1997. Regression Models for Categorical and Limited Dependent Variables. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Ltd.
Lupia, Arthur and Matthew McCubbins. 1998. The Democratic Dilemma: Can Citizens Learn What They Need to Know? New York: Cambridge University Press.
Manfredi, Christopher. 2001. Judicial Power and the Charter: Canada and the Paradox of Liberal Constitutionalism. Don Mills, ON: Oxford University Press.
Nelson, Thomas and Zoe Oxley. 1999. “Issue framing effects and belief importance and opinion.” Journal of Politics 61: 1040–1067.Google Scholar
Nevitte, Neil. 1996. The Decline of Deference: Canadian Value Change in Cross-national Perspective. Peterborough, ON: Broadview Press.
Przeworski, Adam and Henry Teune. 1971. The Logic of Comparative Social Inquiry. New York: Wiley-Interscience.
Raudenbusch, Stephen and Anthony Bryk. 2002. Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Rayside, David and Scott Bowler. 1988. “Public Opinion and Gay Rights.” Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology 25–4: 649–60.Google Scholar
Smith, Miriam. 2002. “Recognizing same-sex relationships: The evolution of recent federal and provincial policies.” Canadian Public Administration 45–1: 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Miriam. 2003. “Social Movements and Judicial Empowerment: Courts, Public Policy and Lesbian and Gay Organizing in Canada.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Philadelphia, PA, August 28–31, 2003.
Sniderman, Paul M., Richard A. Brody and Philip E. Tetlock. 1991. Reasoning and Choice: Explorations in Political Psychology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Sniderman, Paul, Joseph Fletcher, Peter Russell and Philip Tetlock. 1996. The Clash of Rights. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Steenbergen, Marco and B. Jones. 2002. “Modeling Multi-level Data Structures.” American Journal of Political Science 46–1: 218–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomz, Michael, Jason Wittenberg and Gary King. 2003. CLARIFY: Software for Interpreting and Presenting Statistical Results. Version 2.1. Stanford University, University of Wisconsin and Harvard University. Available at http://gking.harvard.edu/.
Tourangeau, Roger, Lance J. Rips and Kenneth Rasinski. 2000. The Psychology of Survey Response. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Zaller, John. 1992. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Zaller, John. 1996. “The Myth of Massive Media Impact Revisited: New Support for a Discredited Idea.” In Political Persuasion and Attitude Change, eds. D. Mutz, P. Sniderman and R. Brody. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.