Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T14:06:02.789Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Restricting Rights, Losing Control: The Politics of Control over Asylum Seekers in Liberal-Democratic States—Lessons from the Canadian Case, 1951–1989

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 December 2010

Christopher G. Anderson
Christopher G. Anderson*
Affiliation:
Wilfrid Laurier University
*
Christopher G. Anderson, Department of Political Science, Wilfrid Laurier University, 75 University Avenue West, Waterloo, Ontario, CanadaN2L 3C, canderson@wlu.ca
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Abstract. Since the 1990s, a prevalent theme in the comparative literature on liberal–democratic state responses to increasing international migration holds that the expansion of rights protections for non-citizens has undermined restrictive border control policies. The argument presented in this article suggests that this is too partial an understanding of the ways in which control and rights intersect—the control–rights nexus. Accordingly, it analyzes Canadian policies towards asylum seekers from the 1950s to the 1980s to explore the ways in which the restriction of rights can undermine state control policies by generating rights-based politics, encouraging the circumvention of control policies and creating administrative inefficiencies. Altogether, the analysis provides an important refinement of the study of the control–rights nexus and allows for a more complete understanding of control policies and politics in liberal–democratic states.

Résumé. Depuis les années 1990, un thème répandu dans la littérature comparative sur les réponses des États libéraux démocratiques à la croissance de la migration internationale soutient que l'extension de la protection des droits des non-citoyens a compromis les politiques restrictives de contrôle des frontières. L'argument présenté dans cet article suggère que ce thème offre une compréhension trop partielle de la dynamique d'intersection du contrôle et des droits – le control-rights nexus. En conséquence, il analyse les politiques canadiennes envers les demandeurs d'asile depuis les années 1950 jusqu'aux années 1980 pour explorer les manières dont la restriction des droits peut miner les politiques de contrôle de l'État en générant des politiques de droits, en encourageant le contournement des politiques de contrôle et en créant des lourdeurs administratives. En somme, l'analyse apporte une mise au point importante à l'étude de cet enjeu et permet une compréhension plus complète des politiques de contrôle et de la politique dans les États libéraux démocratiques.

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique , Volume 43 , Issue 4 , December 2010 , pp. 937 - 959
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Political Science Association 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, Christopher G. 2006. “Restricting Rights, Losing Control: Immigrants, Refugees, Asylum Seekers, and the Regulation of Canada's Border, 1867–1988.” Doctoral dissertation. McGill University, Montreal, Quebec.Google Scholar
Campbell, Charles M. 1985. “Canada's refugee door off hinges.” The Globe and Mail (Toronto), July 17, 7.Google Scholar
Canada. 1966a. White Paper on Immigration. Ottawa.Google Scholar
Canada. 1966b. Minutes of Proceedings and Evidence of the Special Joint Committee of the Senate and the House of Commons on Immigration. Ottawa.Google Scholar
Canada. 1973. Senate Debates, July 18.Google Scholar
Canada. 1977a. House of Commons Debates [hereafter HCD], July 22–25.Google Scholar
Canada. 1977b. Minutes of Proceedings and Evidence of the Standing Committee on Labour, Manpower and Immigration [hereafter SCLMI]. Ottawa.Google Scholar
Canada, 1979. SCLMI. Ottawa.Google Scholar
Canada, 1980. SCLMI. Ottawa.Google Scholar
Canada, 1983. HCD, May 2.Google Scholar
Canada, 1984. SCLMI. Ottawa.Google Scholar
Canada, 1985a. SCLMI. Ottawa.Google Scholar
Canada, 1985b. Minutes of Proceedings and Evidence of the Standing Committee on Labour, Employment and Immigration. Ottawa.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canada, 1987. HCD, May 12–August 11.Google Scholar
Castles, Stephen. 2004. “The Factors that Make and Unmake Migration Policies.” International Migration Review 38: 852–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castles, Stephen, Loughna, Sean and Crawley, Heaven. 2003. States of Conflict: The Causes of Forced Migration to the EU. London: Institute for Public Policy Research.Google Scholar
Cornelius, Wayne A., Martin, Phillip L. and Hollifield, James F.. 1994. “Introduction: The Ambivalent Quest for Immigration Control.” In Controlling Immigration: A Global Perspective, ed. Cornelius, W.A., Martin, P.L. and Hollifield, J.F.. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Cornelius, Wayne A. and Rosenblum, Marc R.. 2005. “Immigration and Politics.” Annual Review of Political Science 8: 99–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cornelius, Wayne A. and Tsuda, Takeyuki. 2004. “Controlling Immigration: The Limits of Government Intervention.” In Controlling Immigration: A Global Perspective, ed. Cornelius, W.A., Tsuda, T., Martin, P.L. and Hollifield, J.F.. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Creese, Gillian. 1992. “The Politics of Refugees in Canada.” In Deconstructing a Nation: Immigration, Multiculturalism and Racism in '90s Canada, ed. Satzewich, V.. Halifax: Fernwood Publishing.Google Scholar
Crépeau, François, Nakache, Delphine and Atak, Idil. 2007. “International Migration: Security Concerns and Human Rights Standards.” Transcultural Psychiatry 44: 311–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Delegation of Concerned Legal Church and Humanitarian Organizations. 1983. “Recommendations for Changes in Canada's Refugee Status Determination Procedures.” Refuge 3: 16–18.Google Scholar
Dirks, Gerald E. 1977. Canada's Refugee Policy: Indifference or Opportunism? Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press.Google Scholar
Dirks, Gerald E. 1984. “A Policy within a Policy: The Identification and Admission of Refugees to Canada.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 17: 279–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dirks, Gerald E. 1995. Controversy and Complexity: Canadian Immigration Policy during the 1980s. Montreal and Kingston: McGill-Queen's University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donaghy, Greg, ed. 1990, Documents on Canadian External Relations, 1951. Ottawa.Google Scholar
Freeman, Gary P. 1998. “The Decline of Sovereignty? Politics and Immigration Restriction in Liberal States.” In Challenge to the Nation–State: Immigration in Western Europe and the United States, ed. Joppke, C.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Freeman, Gary P. 2005. “Political Science and Comparative Immigration Politics.” In International Migration Research: Constructions, Omissions and the Promises of Interdisciplinarity, ed. Bommes, M. and Morawska, E.. Aldershot UK: Ashgate Publishing.Google Scholar
García, María Cristina. 2006. Seeking Refuge: Central American Migration to Mexico, the United States, and Canada. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
García y Griego, Manuel. 1994. “Canada: Flexibility and Control in Immigration and Refugee Policy.” In Controlling Immigration: A Global Perspective, ed. Cornelius, W.A., Martin, P.L. and Hollifield, J.F.. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Ghosh, Bimal. 1998. Huddled Masses and Uncertain Shores: Insights into Irregular Migration. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guiraudon, Virginie. 2001. “De-nationalizing control: Analyzing state responses to constraints in migration control.” In Controlling a New Migration World, ed. Guiraudon, V. and Joppke, C.. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Guiraudon, Virginie and Lahav, Gallya. 2000. “A Reappraisal of the State Sovereignty Debate: The Case of Migration Control.” Comparative Political Studies 33: 163–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, Randall. 2002. “Globalization, Embedded Realism, and Path Dependence: The Other Immigrants to Europe.” Comparative Political Studies 35: 259–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harpur, Tom. 1979. “Is our ‘cruel’ immigration rule sending this man to his death?” The Toronto Star, February 10, A1, A12.Google Scholar
Hawkins, Freda. 1988. Canada and Immigration: Public Policy and Public Concern. Montreal and Kingston: McGill-Queen's University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hollifield, James F. 1992. Immigrants, Markets, and States: The Political Economy of Postwar Europe. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hollifield, James F. 1999. “Ideas, Institutions, and Civil Society: On the Limits of Immigration Control in Liberal Democracies.” IMIS-Beitrage 100: 57–90.Google Scholar
Hollifield, James F. 2000. “The Politics of International Migration: How Can We ‘Bring the State Back In’?” In Migration Theory: Talking across Disciplines, ed. Brettell, C.B. and Hollifield, J.F.. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hollifield, James F. 2005. “The Emerging Migration State.” International Migration Review 38: 885–912.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Immigration changes possible next year.” 1984. The Halifax Chronicle Herald, July 4, 22.Google Scholar
Joppke, Christian. 1997. “Asylum and State Sovereignty: A Comparison of the United States, Germany, and Britain.” Comparative Political Studies 30: 259–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joppke, Christian. 1998. “Immigration Challenges the Nation-State.” In Challenge to the Nation-State: Immigration in Western Europe and the United States, ed. Joppke, C.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joppke, Christian. 1999. Immigration and the Nation-State: The United States, Germany, and Great Britain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joppke, Christian. 2001. “The Legal–Domestic Sources of Immigrant Rights: The United States, Germany, and the European Union.” Comparative Political Studies 34: 339–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joppke, Christian and Marzal, Elia. 2004. “Courts, the New Constitutionalism and Immigrant Rights: The Case of the French Conseil Constitutionnel.” European Journal of Political Research 43: 823–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelley, Ninette and Trebilcock, Michael. 1998. The Making of the Mosaic: A History of Canadian Immigration Policy. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Knopff, Rainer and Morton, F.L.. 1992. Charter Politics. Scarborough ON: Nelson Canada.Google Scholar
Knowles, Valerie. 1997. Strangers at Our Gates: Canadian Immigration and Immigration Policy, 1540–1997. Toronto: Dundurn Press.Google Scholar
Lahav, Gallya and Guiraudon, Virginie. 2006. “Actors and Venues in Immigration Control: Closing the Gap between Political Demands and Policy Outcomes.” West European Politics 26: 201–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macklin, Audrey. 2005. “Disappearing Refugees: Reflections on the Canada–US Safe Third Country Agreement.” Columbia Human Rights Law Review 36: 365–426.Google Scholar
Malarek, Victor. 1985. “20,000 refugees, migrants wrack immigration system.” The Globe and Mail (Toronto), May 28, M1, M6.Google Scholar
Malarek, Victor. 1987. Haven's Gate: Canada's Immigration Fiasco. Toronto: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Manfredi, Christopher P. 2001. Judicial Power and the Charter: Canada and the Paradox of Liberal Constitutionalism. Toronto: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Plaut, W. Gunther. 1985. Refugee Determination in Canada: Proposals for a New System. Ottawa.Google Scholar
Portes, Alejandro. 1997. “Immigration Theory for a New Century: Some Problems and Opportunities.” International Migration Review 31: 799–825.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ratushny, Ed. 1984. A New Refugee Status Determination Process for Canada. Ottawa.Google Scholar
Reitz, Jeffrey G. 2004. “Immigration and Canadian Nation-Building in the Transition to a Knowledge Economy.” In Controlling Immigration: A Global Perspective, ed. Cornelius, W.A., Tsuda, T., Martin, P.L. and Hollifield, J.F.. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Supreme Court of Canada. Singh v. Minister of Employment and Immigration, [1985] 1 S.C.R.Google Scholar
Task Force on Immigration Practices and Procedures. 1981. The Refugee Status Determination Process. Ottawa.Google Scholar
UNHCR. 1998. “Comments on Not Just Numbers: A Canadian Framework for Future Immigration.” Ottawa.Google Scholar
UNHCR. 2006. State of the World's Refugees: Human Displacement in the New Millennium. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Zolberg, Aristide R. 1999. “Matters of State: Theorizing Immigration Policy.” In The Handbook of International Migration: the American Experience, ed. Hirschman, C., Kasinitz, P. and DeWind, J.. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar