Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T23:42:49.906Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The REACH protocol: an innovative strategy for home management of infants with complex CHD

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2018

Desiree A. Fleck Open the ORCID record for Desiree A. Fleck [Opens in a new window] ,
Bradley S. Marino ,
John M. Costello ,
Chitra Ravishankar ,
Deborah Torowicz ,
Carrie Alden ,
Kathleen Van’t Hof  and
Barbara Medoff-Cooper
Desiree A. Fleck*
Affiliation:
School of Nursing, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA Cardiac Center, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA
Bradley S. Marino
Affiliation:
Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children’s Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
John M. Costello
Affiliation:
Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children’s Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
Chitra Ravishankar
Affiliation:
Cardiac Center, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA
Deborah Torowicz
Affiliation:
Cardiac Center, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA
Carrie Alden
Affiliation:
Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children’s Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
Kathleen Van’t Hof
Affiliation:
Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children’s Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
Barbara Medoff-Cooper
Affiliation:
School of Nursing, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA Cardiac Center, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA
*
Author for correspondence: D. Fleck, PhD, ACNP-BC, CPNP-AC, School of Nursing, Family and Community Health, Claire M Fagin Hall, 418 Curie Boulevard, Room 481, Philadelphia, PA 19104-4217, USA. Tel: 215 833 5584; Fax: 215 898 3056; E-mail: desiree.fleck@gmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Approximately 32,000 infants are born with CHDs each year in the United States of America. Of every 1000 live births, 2.3 require surgical or transcatheter intervention in the first year of life. There are few more stressful times for parents than when their neonate receives a diagnosis of complex CHD requiring surgery. The stress of caring for these infants is often unrelenting and may last for weeks, months, and often years, placing parents at risk for developing post-traumatic stress disorder, as well as a drastic decrease in quality of life. Anxiety often peaks in the days and weeks after discharge from the hospital as families no longer have immediate access to nursing and medical staff. The purpose of this paper is to describe the methods of a randomised controlled trial that was designed to determine whether REACH would favourably affect parental and infant outcomes by decreasing parental stress, improve parental quality of life, increase infant stability, and decrease resource utilisation in infants with complex CHD.

Keywords

CHDtelehealthtelemedicinefeedinginfantstransitional care model
Type
Original Articles
Information
Cardiology in the Young , Volume 28 , Issue 7 , July 2018 , pp. 961 - 967
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Hoffman, JL, Kaplan, S. The incidence of congenital heart disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002; 39: 1890–1900.Google Scholar
2. Gillum, RF. Epidemiology of congenital heart disease in the United States. Am Heart J 1994; 127 (Pt 1): 919–927.Google Scholar
3. Melnyk, BM, Alpert-Gillis, L, Feinstein, NF, et al. Creating opportunities for parent empowerment: program effects on the mental health/coping outcomes of critically ill young children and their mothers. Pediatrics 2004; 113: e597–e607.Google Scholar
4. Manne, SL, Du Hamel, K, Gallelli, K, Sorgen, K, Redd, WH. Posttraumatic stress disorder among mothers of pediatric cancer survivors: diagnosis, comorbidity, and utility of the PTSD checklist as a screening instrument. J Pediatr Psychol 1998; 23: 357–366.Google Scholar
5. Morgan, GJ, Craig, B, Grant, B, Sands, A, Doherty, N, Casey, F. Home videoconferencing for patients with severe congenital heart disease following discharge. Congenit Heart Dis 2008; 3: 317–324.Google Scholar
6. Vilhjalmsson, R., Kristjansdottir, G. Sociodemographic variables in parental role strain: Results from a national general population survey. Scand J of Pub Health 2006; 34: 262–271.Google Scholar
7. Visconti, KJ, Saudino, KJ, Rappaport, LA, Newberger, JW, Bellinger, DC. Influence of parental stress and social support on the behavioral adjustment of children with transposition of the great arteries. Dev Behav Pediatr 2002; 23: 314–321.Google Scholar
8. Breslau, N, Staruch, KS, Mortimer, EA Jr. Psychological distress in mothers of disabled children. Am J Dis Child 1982; 136: 682–686.Google Scholar
9. Hintermair, M. Children who are hearing impaired with additional disabilities and related aspects of parental stress. Exceptional Child 2000; 66: 327–334.Google Scholar
10. Hartman, D, Medoff-Cooper, B. Transition to home after neonatal surgery for congenital heart disease. MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs 2012; 37: 95–100.Google Scholar
11. Ghanayem, NS, Cava, JR, Jaquiss, RD, Tweddell, JS. . Home monitoring of infants after stage one palliation for hypoplastic left heart syndrome. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Pediatr Card Surg Annu 2004; 7: 32–38.Google Scholar
12. Tregay, J, Brown, KL, Crowe, S, et al. Signs of deterioration infants discharged home following congenital heart surgery in the first year of life: a qualitative study. Arch Dis Child 2016; 101: 902–908.Google Scholar
13. Anderson, JB, Marino, BS, Irving, SY, et al. Poor post-operative growth in infants with two-ventricle physiology. Cardiol Young 2011; 21: 421–429.Google Scholar
14. Ghanayem, NS, Hoffman, GM, Mussatto, KA, et al. Home surveillance program prevents interstage mortality after the Norwood procedure. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2003; 126: 1367–1377.Google Scholar
15. Carlo, WF, Cnota, J, Dabal, RJ, Anderson, JB. Practice trends overtime in the care of infants with hypoplastic left heart syndrome: a report from the national Pediatric Cardiology Quality Improvement Collaborative. Congenit Heart Dis 2017; 12: 315–321.Google Scholar
16. Ugonabo, N, Hirsch-Romano, JC, Uzark, K. The role of home monitoring in interstage management of infants following the Norwood procedure. World J Pediatr Congenit Heart Surg 2015; 6: 266–273.Google Scholar
17. Nieves, JA, Uzark, K, Rudd, NA, Starwn, J, Schmelzer, A, Dobrolet, N. Interstage home monitoring after newborn first-stage palliation for hypoplastic left heart syndrome: family education strategies. Crit Care Nurse, 37: 72–88.Google Scholar
18. Weston, C, Adil Husain, S, Curzon, CL, et al. Improving outcomes for infants with single ventricle physiology through standardized feeding during the interstage. Nurs Res Pract, 2016; Article ID 9505629, 7 pages.Google Scholar
19. Rudd, N, Fommelt, MA, Hehir, DA, Slicker, JA, Mussatto, KA, Ghanayem, NS. Improving interstage survival after Norwood operation: outcomes following 10 years of home monitoring. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2014; 148: 1540–1547.Google Scholar
20. Harahshesh, AS, Hom, LA, Clauss, SB, et al. The impact of a designated cardiology team involving telemedicine home monitoring on the care of children with single-ventricle physiology after Norwood palliation. Pediatr Cardiol 2016; 37: 899–912.Google Scholar
21. Petit, CJ, Fraser, CD, Mattamal, R, Slesnick, TC, Cephus, CE, Ocampo, EC. The impact of a dedicated single-ventricle home-monitoring program on interstage somatic growth, interstage attrition, and 1-year survival. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 142: 1358–1366.Google Scholar
22. Stoffel, G, Spirig, R, Stiasny, B, Bernet, V, Dave, H, Knirsch, W. Psychosocial impact on families with an infant with a hypoplastic left heart syndrome during and after the interstage monitoring period – a prospective mixed-method study. J Clin Nurs 2016; 26: 3363–3370.Google Scholar
23. Grabowski, DC, O’Malley, AJ. Use of telemedicine can reduce hospitalizations of nursing home residents and generate savings for Medicare. Health Aff 2014; 33: 244–250.Google Scholar
24. Thomas, CL, Man, MS, O’Cathain, A. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a telehealth intervention to support the management of long term conditions: study protocol for two linked randomized controlled trials. Trials 2014; 24: 15–36.Google Scholar
25. Tappenden, P, Campbell, F, Rawdin, A, Wong, R, Kalita, N. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of home-based, nurse led health promotion for older people: a systematic review. Health Technol Assess 2012; 16: 1–72.Google Scholar
26. McCrossan, B, Morgan, G, Grant, B, Sands, A, Craig, B, Casey, F. Assisting the transition from hospital to home for children with major congenital heart disease by telemedicine: a feasibility study and initial results. Medical Informatics & the Internet in Medicine 2007; 232: 97–304.Google Scholar
27. Bowles, KH, Holland, DE, Horowitz, DA. A comparison of in-person home care, home care with telephone contact and home care with telemonitoring for disease management. J Telemed Telecare 2009; 15: 344–350.Google Scholar
28. Dehghani, P, Atallah, J, Rebeyka, I, et al. Management of adults with congenital heart disease using videoconferencing across Western Canada: a 3-year experience. Can J Cardiol 2013; 29: 873–878.Google Scholar
29. Adriaanse, BM, Tromp, CH, Simpson, JM, et al. Interobserver agreement in detailed prenatal diagnosis of congenital heart disease by telemedicine using four-dimensional ultrasound with spatiotemporal image correlation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2012; 39: 203–209.Google Scholar
30. de Jongh, T, Gurol-Urganci, I, Vodopivec-Jamsek, V, Car, J, Atun, R. Mobile phone messaging for facilitating self-management of long-term illnesses. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012; 12: CD007459.Google Scholar
31. Grant, B, Morgan, GJ, McCrossan, BA, et al. Remote diagnosis of congenital heart disease: the impact of telemedicine. Arch Dis Child 2009; 95: 276–280.Google Scholar
32. Black, AK, Sadanala, UK, Mascio, CE, Hornung, CA, Keller, BB. Challenges in implementing a pediatric cardiovascular home Telehealth project. Telemed e-Health 2014; 20: 858–867.Google Scholar
33. Cross, R., Steury, R, Randall, A, Fuska, M, Sable, C. Single-ventricle palliation for high-risk neonates: examining the feasibility of an automated home monitoring system after Stage 1 palliation. Future Cardiol 2012; 8: 227–235.Google Scholar
34. Abiden, R. Parenting Stress Index Long Form: Test Manual. Western Psychological Services, Los Angeles, 1990.Google Scholar
35. Goldbeck, L, Melches, J. Quality of life in families of children with congenital heart disease. Qual Life Res 2005; 14: 1915–1924.Google Scholar
36. Vaglio, J Jr., Conard, M, Poston, WS, et al. Testing the performance of the ENRICHD Social Support Instrument in cardiac patients. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2004; 2: 24.Google Scholar
37. Medoff-Cooper, B, Carey, WB, McDevitt, SC. The early infancy temperament questionnaire. J Dev Behav Pediatr 1993; 14: 230–235.Google Scholar
38. Wright, CM, Parkinson, KN, Drewett, RF. How does maternal and child feeding behavior relate to weight gain and failure to thrive? Data from a prospective birth cohort. Pediatrics 2006; 117: 1262–1269.Google Scholar
39. Beller, E, Gebski, V, Keech, A. Randomization in clinical trials. Med J Aust 2002; 177: 565–568.Google Scholar
40. Selvin, S. Statistical Analysis of Epidemiologic Data, 3rd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2004.Google Scholar
41. Greene, W. Econometric Analysis, 6th edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 2008.Google Scholar