Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T01:48:36.529Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Aortic run-off in children with arterial shunts or persistent arterial duct—characteristics of flow detected by Doppler techniques in the descending aorta

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 August 2008

Cameron J. B. Ward
Affiliation:
From the Adolph Basser Institute of Cardiology, Royal Alexandra Hospital for Children, Camperdown, Sydney
Gary F. Sholler*
Affiliation:
From the Adolph Basser Institute of Cardiology, Royal Alexandra Hospital for Children, Camperdown, Sydney
*
Correspondence to Dr. G. Shollar, Royal Alexandra Hospital for Children, P.O. Box 34, Campertown 2050, Sydney, Australia. Tel. (02) 5190466; Fax. (02) 557 2055.

Abstract

Flow in the descending aorta was studied to characterize aortic run-off in patients with shunts at the arterial level. Pulsed Doppler examination of descending aortic flow was performed with simultaneous estimation of ratios of shunt-to-systemic flow (shunt flow ratio) at cardiac catheterization. We studied 14 patients with shunt-dependent circulations, eight patients with isolated persistence of the arterial duct, 11 normals and five patients immediately after umbrella occlusion of their persistent arterial duct. Parameters of diastolic flow were standardized to systolic parameters. The ratio of diastolic velocity to the time integral (velocity/time integral retrograde diastolic flow ÷ velocity/time integral systolic flow) ranged from 1×10−1−10.8×10−1. Shunt flow ratios ranged from 0.1−3.9. Pandiastolic retrograde flow was seen in 21 of 22 patients with shunts at the arterial level (the ratio was 0.1 in the remaining patient). No normal patient exhibited pandiastolic retrograde flow. Of the five patients undergoing ductal closure, three exhibited persistent pandiastolic retrograde aortic flow following effective occlusion. The ratio of diastolic velocity to the time integral correlated with the ratio of shunt flow (r=0.76, standard error 0.7). A diastolic velocity/time integral ratio of greater than 8.5×10−1 (sensitivity 67%, specificity 94%) selected patients with shunt flow ratio greater than two, and a diastolic velocity/time integral ratio of less than 5×10−1 (sensitivity 100%, specificity 94%) selected shunt flow ratios of less than 0.5.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Snider, AR, Serwer, GA. Echocardiography in Pediatric Heart Disease. Year Book Medical Publishers, Chicago, 1990, pp 59332.Google Scholar
Takenaka, K, Dabestani, A, Gardin, J, Russell, D, Clark, S, Allfie, A, Henry, W. A simple Doppler echocardiographic method for estimating severity of aortic regurgitation. Am J Cardiol 1986; 57: 13401343.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shah, PM. Doppler assessment of aortic regurgitation. Correlation with hemodynamics and angiography. Herz 1986; 11: 318322.Google ScholarPubMed
Tribouilloy, C, Avinee, P, Shen, W, Rey, J, Slama, M, Lesbre, J. End diastolic flow velocity just beneath the aortic isthmus assessed by pulsed Doppler echocardiography: a new predictor of the aortic regurgitant fraction. Br Heart J 1991; 65: 3740.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ulmer, HE, Knapp, G, Wolf, D, Wille, L, Seyberth, HW. Aortic flow velocity curves in the diagnosis and the followup of symptomatic patent ductus arteriosus in preterm infants during therapeutic interventions. Pediatr Pharmacol 1983; 3: 167174.Google ScholarPubMed
Davis, AM, Menaham, S. Retrograde flow in the distal aortic arch and proximal descending aorta—a clue to the presence of a major cerebral arteriovenous malformation. Cardiol Young 1993; 3: 161163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grossman, W. Cardiac Catheterisation and Angiography. Lea & Febiger, Philadelphia, 1986, p 159.Google Scholar
O'Rourke, MF. Vascular impedence in studies of arterial and cardiac function. Physiological Reviews 1982; 62: 570623.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed