Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T23:24:54.319Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Assessment of cardiac parameters using gated myocardial perfusion and echocardiography in children

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 December 2008

Pinar O. Kiratli  and
Murat F. Bozkurt
Pinar O. Kiratli*
Affiliation:
Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hacettepe University Medical Faculty, Ankara, Turkey
Murat F. Bozkurt
Affiliation:
Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hacettepe University Medical Faculty, Ankara, Turkey
*
Correspondence to: Pinar O. Kiratli, M.D., Hacettepe University Medical Faculty, Dept. of Nuclear Medicine, 06100 Sihhiye, Ankara, Turkey. Tel: 00 90 312 3051336; Fax: 00 90 312 3094101; E-mail: pkiratli@hacettepe.edu.tr
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Echocardiographic and radionuclide techniques are the most common techniques currently used to assess ventricular function. The aim of our study was to assess the performance of two well-known methods for analysis of gated myocardial perfusion with comparison to echocardiography in children. We analyzed the data from 64 children referred for myocardial perfusion scintigraphy. All underwent echocardiography and stress gated myocardial perfusion scintigraphy, except 5 who had only rest scintigraphy. We calculated the left ventricular volumes and ejection fractions. The parametric information from the echocardiographic reports was compared to the data obtained using gated myocardial perfusion. The reliability between the quantitative gated scintigraphy, the Emory cardiac toolbox, and echocardiography for end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes and ejection fractions in studies performed at rest were calculated at 0.85, 0.86 and 0.97, respectively using Cronbach’s alpha coefficient. The values in stress studies were 0.83, 0.86 and 0.90, respectively. There was a high correlation, with r more than 0.88, between quantitative gated scintigraphy and the Emory cardiac toolbox for ejection fractions, and end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes, in studies performed both under stress and at rest. Weak correlation was observed between quantitative gated scintigraphy and the Emory cardiac toolbox compared to echocardiography, especially when considering ventricular volumes in stress studies. Although high correlation was observed between quantitative gated scintigraphy and the Emory cardiac toolbox, comparison with echocardiography showed poor agreement for both, meaning that scintigraphy is less suitable for assessing left ventricular volumes, and less reliable in assessment of ejection fractions. Echocardiography seems to remain the most widely used and reliable technique for this part of the diagnostic work up.

Keywords

Ejection fractionend-diastolic volumeend-systolic volumeradionuclide imagingM-mode echocardiography
Type
Original Article
Information
Cardiology in the Young , Volume 19 , Issue 1 , February 2009 , pp. 53 - 59
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Iskandrian, AS, Hakki, AH, Goel, IP, Mundth, ED, Kane-Marsch, SA, Schenk, CL. The use of rest and exercise radionuclide ventriculography in risk stratification in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. Am Heart J 1985; 110: 864–872.Google Scholar
2. Fuster, V, Gersh, BJ, Giuliani, ER, Tajik, AJ, Brandenburg, RO, Frye, RL. The natural history of idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. Am J Cardiol 1981; 74: 525–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Germano, G, Nichols, K, Cullom, J, et al. Gated perfusion SPECT. Technical considerations. In: DePuey EG, Berman DS, Garcia EV (eds). Cardiac SPECT, 2nd ed. Lippincott Williams&Wilkins, Philadelphia, 2001, pp 103–115.Google Scholar
4. Faber, TL, Akers, MS, Peshock, RM, Corbett, JR. Three dimensional motion and perfusion quantification in gated single photon emission computed tomograms. J Nucl Med 1991; 32: 2311–2317.Google ScholarPubMed
5. Nichols, K, Lefkowitz, D, Faber, T, et al. Echocardiographic validation of gated SPECT ventricular function measurements. J Nucl Med 2000; 41: 1308–1314.Google ScholarPubMed
6. Germano, G, Kiat, H, Kavanagh, PB, et al. Automatic quantification of ejection fraction from Gated myocardial perfusion SPECT. J Nucl Med 1995; 36: 2138–2147.Google Scholar
7. Faber, TL, Cooke, CD, Folks, RD, et al. Left ventricular function and perfusion from gated perfusion images: an integrated method. J Nucl Med 1999; 40: 650–659.Google Scholar
8. Everaert, H, Bossuyt, A, Franken, PR. Left ventricular ejection fraction and volumes from gated SPECT myocardial perfusion images: comparison between two algorithms working in three-dimensional space. J Nucl Cardiol 1997; 4: 472–476.Google Scholar
9. Brennan, P, Silman, A. Statistical methods for assessing observer variability in clinical measures. BMJ 1992; 304: 1491–1494.Google Scholar
10. Germano, G, Berman, D. Quantitative gated perfusion SPECT. In: Germano G, Berman D (eds). Clinical Gated cardiac SPECT. Futura, New York, 1999, pp 110–170.Google Scholar
11. Iskandrian, AE, Germano, G, VanDecker, W, et al. Validation of left ventricular volume measurements by Gated SPECT Tc-99m labelled MIBI imaging. J Nucl Cardiol 1998; 5: 574–578.Google Scholar
12. De Bondt, P, Van de Wiele, C, De Sutter, J, De Winter, F, De Backer, G, Dierckx, RA. Age and gender-specific differences in left ventricular cardiac function and volumes determined by gated SPET. Eur J Nucl Med 2001; 28: 620–624.Google Scholar
13. Bacher-Stier, C, Muller, S, Pachinger, O, et al. Thallium-201 gated single photon emission tomography for the assessment of left ventriculer ejection fraction and regional wall motion abnormalities in comparison with two dimentional echocardiography. Eur J Nucl Med 1999; 26: 1533–1540.Google Scholar
14. Toba, M, Kumita, S, Cho, K, et al. Comparison of Emory and Cedars-Sinai methods for assessment of left ventricular function from Gated myocardial perfusion SPECT in patients with a small heart. Ann Nucl Med 2000; 14: 421–426.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15. Nichols, K, Santana, C, Folks, R, et al. Comparison between Emory Cardiac Toolbox and quantitative gated spect for assessment of left ventricular function from Gated myocardial perfusion SPECT. J Nucl Cardiol 2002; 9: 285–293.Google Scholar