Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T14:43:13.302Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Cardiovascular health among Philadelphia adolescents: analysis of youth risk behaviour data, 2011

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 September 2013

Clare M. Lenhart*
Affiliation:
Department of Health Studies, East Stroudsburg University, East Stroudsburg, United States of America
Janna Manjelievskaia
Affiliation:
Department of Public Health, Temple University College of Health Professions and Social Work, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America
Andrea Echeverri
Affiliation:
Department of Public Health, Temple University College of Health Professions and Social Work, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America
Freda Patterson
Affiliation:
Department of Public Health, Temple University College of Health Professions and Social Work, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America
*
Correspondence to: C. M. Lenhart, Department of Health Studies, East Stroudsburg University, 200 Prospect Street, East Stroudsburg, PA, 18301, United States of America. Tel: 570-422-3748; Fax: 570-322-3848; E-mail: clenhart1@esu.edu

Abstract

Improving population-level cardiovascular health is a public health priority. Guided by the American Heart Association's metrics for ideal heart health, we examined the prevalence of behavioural heart health indicators using a representative sample of urban adolescents. Less than 1% (0.6%) of the sample had ideal heart health. The alarmingly low percentage of ideal behavioural heart health suggests that primary prevention approaches to address cardiovascular health in youth are warranted.

Type
Brief Reports
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Xu, J, Kochanek, K, Murphy, S, et al. Deaths: final data for 2007. National Vital Statistics Reports 2010; 58: 1135.Google Scholar
2. Lloyd-Jones, DM, Hong, Y, Labarthe, D, et al. Defining and setting national goals for cardiovascular health promotion and disease reduction: the American Heart Association's strategic Impact Goal through 2020 and beyond. Circulation 2010; 121: 586613.Google Scholar
3. Folsom, AR, Yatsuya, H, Nettleton, JA, et al. Community prevalence of ideal cardiovascular health, by the American Heart Association definition, and relationship with cardiovascular disease incidence. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011; 57: 16901696.Google Scholar
4. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Methodology of the youth risk behavior surveillance system. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report 2004; 53: RR-12.Google Scholar
5. Kuczmarski, RJ, Ogden, CL, Guo, SS, et al. 2000 CDC growth charts for the United States: methods and development. Vital Health Stat 2002; 11: 1190.Google Scholar
6. Strong, WB, Malina, RM, Blimkie, CJ, et al. Evidence based physical activity for school-age youth. J Pediatr 2005; 146: 732737.Google Scholar
7. Fang, J, Yang, Q, Hong, Y, et al. Status of cardiovascular health among adult Americans in the 50 States and the District of Columbia, 2009. J Am Heart Assoc 2012; 1: e005371.Google Scholar
8. Fung, TT, Malik, V, Rexrode, KM, et al. Sweetened beverage consumption and risk of coronary heart disease in women. Am J Clin Nutr 2009; 89: 10371042.Google Scholar
9. Shay, CM, Ning, H, Daniels, SR, et al. Status of cardiovascular health in US adolescents: prevalence estimates from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys (NHANES) 2005–2010. Circulation 2013; 127: 13691376.Google Scholar
10. Magnussen, CG, Koskinen, J, Juonala, M, et al. A diagnosis of the metabolic syndrome in youth that resolves by adult life is associated with a normalization of high carotid intima-media thickness and type 2 diabetes mellitus risk: the Bogalusa heart and cardiovascular risk in young Finns studies. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012; 60: 16311639.Google Scholar