Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T04:24:49.871Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Detection of cardiovascular abnormalities in the nursery of a general hospital in the Amazon region: correlation with potential risk factors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 August 2008

Sheila Maria Almeida Gomes Ferreira ,
Alberto Gomes Ferreira Jr ,
Maria de Lourdes Contente Gomes ,
Alexandre da Costa Linhares  and
Luiz Vénere Décourt
Sheila Maria Almeida Gomes Ferreira*
Affiliation:
Fundação Luiz Décourt, Cardiology Department, Brazil
Alberto Gomes Ferreira Jr
Affiliation:
Fundação Luiz Décourt, Cardiology Department, Brazil
Maria de Lourdes Contente Gomes
Affiliation:
Instituto Evandro Chagas, Virology Department, Belém, Pará
Alexandre da Costa Linhares
Affiliation:
Instituto Evandro Chagas, Virology Department, Belém, Pará
Luiz Vénere Décourt
Affiliation:
Emeritus Professor of University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
*
Sheila Maria Almeida Gomes Ferreira MD, PhD, Fundação Luiz Décourt, Cardiology Department, Rua Jerônimo Pimentel, 519 Umarizal, Belém, Pará, Brazil, CEP 66055–202. Tel: (091) 2414478; Fax: (091) 2250641.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Congenital heart diseases have been studied much more extensively in children than in neonates. In this study, we report on the findings from 57 neonates seen from June of 1995 through June 1996 in the nursery of a large public hospital in Belém, Para, Brazil. All were routinely examined by a paediatrician just after birth, and, when indicated, these babies were referred to the cardiology unit of our Hospital for assessment by a paediatric cardiologist. Most of the diagnoses were made by means of Doppler and cross-sectional echocardiography with color flow mapping. Several abnormalities of the cardiovascular system were diagnosed. The most frequent was patency of the arterial duct. But, since many ducts closed spontaneously, ventricular septal defect was the most frequent lesion seen even in the nursery. Four defects (patent arterial duct, ventricular septal defect, atrial septal defect and pulmonary stenosis) together accounted for two thirds of all cardiac abnormalities. Associated non-cardiac anomalies were more frequent in those with simple lesions within the heart. All the babies with complex heart disease, and the majority of those designated as having significant lesions, died before they could be discharged. Several risk factors were investigated. Among maternal drugs, misoprostol emerged as having a possible teratogenic effect.

Keywords

Congenital heart diseaserisk factors in congenital heart diseasecardiovascular abnormalities in the nurserypaediatric cardiology
Type
Original Articles
Information
Cardiology in the Young , Volume 9 , Issue 2 , March 1999 , pp. 163 - 168
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Sung, RYT, So, LY, Ho, JKS, Fok, TK. Echocardiography as a tool for determining the incidence of congenital heart disease:a pilot study in Hong kong. Int J Cardiol 1991, 30, 43–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2.Atik, E, Maeda, W. Manuselo do recém-nascido cardiopata–o estado atual e a necessaria refomulação. Arq Bras Cardiol; 1992 58: 83–87.Google Scholar
3.Hoffman, JIE. Incidence, mortality and natural history. In: Anderson, RH, Macartney, FJ, Shinebourne, EA, Tynan, M. eds. Paediatric Cardiology. Churchill Livingstone: Edinburgh, 1987; 3–7.Google Scholar
4.Dickinson, DF, Arnold, R, Wilkinson, JL. Congenital heart disease among 160,480 liveborn children in Liverpool 1960 to 1969: implications for surgical treatment. Br Heart J 1981; 46: 55–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5.Abu-Harb, M, Hey, E, Wren, C. Death in infancy from unrecognised congenital heart disease. Arch of Dis in Child 1994; 71: 3–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6.Bound, JP, Logan, WFWE. Incidence of congenital heart disease in Blackpool 1957–1971. Br Heart J 1977; 39: 445–450.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7.Atik, E, Bustamante, LN, Marcial, MB, Verginelli, G, Ebaid, M. Cardiopatias congênitas no primeiro ano de vida: aspectos clinicos, frequência e conduta. Arq Bras Cardiol 1981; 36, (5): 315–319.Google Scholar
8.Hoffman, JIE, Christanson, R. Congenital heart disease in a cohort of 19,502 births with long-term follow-up. Am JCardiol 1978; 42: 641–647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Firpo, C, Azcarate, MJM, Jimenez, MQ, Saravalli, O. Discrete subaortic stenosis in childhood: a congenital or acquired disease? Follow-up in 65 patients. Eur Heart J 1990; 11: 1033–1040.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10.Freedom, RM, Pelech, A, Brand, A, Vogel, M, Olley, PM, Smallhorn, J, Rowe, RD. The progressive nature of subaortic stenosis in congenital heart disease. Int J Cardiol 1985; 8: 137–143.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11.Vogel, M, Freedom, RM, Brand, A, Tussler, GA, Williams, WG, Rowe, RD. Ventricular septal defect and subaortic stenosis: an analysis of 41 patients. Am J Cardiol 1983; 52: 830–835.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12.Redington, AN. Clinical assessment of the neonate and infant with suspected congenital heart disease: how to avoid some of the pitfalls. Cutrent Paediatrics 1991; 1: 65–72.Google Scholar
13.Dickinson, DF, Arnold, R, Wilkinson, JL. Ventricular septal defect in children born in Liverpool 1960 to 1969 evaluation of natural course and surgical implications in an unselected population. Br Heart J 1981; 46: 47–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Feldt, RH, Avasthey, P, Yoshiamsu, F, Kurland, LT, Titus, JL. Incidence of congenital heart disease in children born to residents of Olmsted County, Minesota, 1950–1969. Mayo Clin Proc 1971; 46: 794–799.Google Scholar
15.Schönhöfer, PS. Brazil: Misuse of misoprostol as an abortifacient may induce malformations. The Lancet 1991; 337: 1534–1535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar