Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T19:36:26.818Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Development of a clinician–parent home care education intervention

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 August 2019

Blake Lane ,
Samuel P. Hanke ,
Barbara Giambra ,
Nicolas L. Madsen  and
Sandra L. Staveski
Blake Lane*
Affiliation:
Live Well Collaborative, Cincinnati, OH, USA College of Design, Architecture, Art & Planning, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA
Samuel P. Hanke
Affiliation:
Department of Research in Patient Services, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA
Barbara Giambra
Affiliation:
Department of Research in Patient Services, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA
Nicolas L. Madsen
Affiliation:
Department of Heart Institute, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA
Sandra L. Staveski
Affiliation:
Department of Family Health Care Nursing, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
*
Author for correspondence: Blake Lane, PhDc, Live Well Collaborative, 2900 Reading Road, Suite 350, Cincinnati, OH 45206, USA. E-mails: blakelane@livewellcollaborative.org; lanejb@mail.uc.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objectives:

To examine the strengths and opportunities for improvement of current home care education practices to inform the development of the Home Care for Heart Health intervention, and to develop a web-based intervention for parents and clinicians with complimentary print materials that could provide the right education at the right time to foster a safer transition from hospital to home.

Methods:

An inter-professional focus group of parents, clinicians, and designers was formed to co-create a home care education intervention for parents of children with congenital heart disease (CHD) and their care team. We used the Integrated New Product Development process model created by Jonathon Cagan and Craig Vogel at Carnegie Mellon University to develop the intervention. This process model is a way of thinking that combines horizontal and inter-disciplinary teams, stakeholder-centric focus, and a system of qualitative discovery and development evolving towards quantitative methods of refinement.

Results:

Our team developed the Home Care for Heart Health intervention. The evidenced-based intervention includes a quick reference guide for parents of children with CHD, an accompanying app, family-friendly pathways, and clinician education.

Conclusion:

Using an inter-professional approach, our team of clinicians, parents, and design experts were able to co-create a clinician–parent home care education intervention with broad application and lifelong relevance to the Congenital Heart Disease Community.

Practice Implications:

Our intervention has the potential to be used as a model for other home care education interventions for parents of children with chronic illnesses.

Keywords

Parent home care educationdischarge educationdesign-thinking methodology
Type
Original Article
Information
Cardiology in the Young , Volume 29 , Issue 10 , October 2019 , pp. 1230 - 1235
Check for updates
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Hoffman, JIE. Incidence of congenital heart disease: II. Prenatal incidence. Pediatr Cardiol 1995; 16: 155–165.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Staveski, SL, Parveen, VP, Madathil, SB, Kools, S, Frank, LS. Parent education discharge instruction program for care of children at home after cardiac surgery in Southern India. Cardiol Young 2016; 26: 1213–1220.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Staveski, SL, Parveen, VP, Madathil, SB, Kools, S, Frank, LS. Nurse and parent perceptions associated with the Parent Education Discharge Instruction Programme in southern India. Cardiol Young 2016; 26: 1168–1175.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, J, Cheater, F, Bekker, H. Parent’s experiences of living with a child with a long-term condition: a rapid structure review of the literature. Health Expect 2013; 18: 452–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tucker, D, Sullivan, KT, Eichler, V, Williams, LB, Amato, JJ. Congenital heart lesions. In: Reuter-Rice, K, Bolick, B (eds). Pediatric Acute Care: A Guide to Interprofessional Practice. Jones & Bartlett Learning, Burlington, 2012: 262–295.Google Scholar
Staveski, SL, Zhelva, B, Paul, R, et al. Pediatric cardiac surgery Parent Education Discharge Instruction (PEDI) program: a pilot study. World J Pediatr Congenit Heart Surg 2015; 6: 18–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Daily, J, Fitzgerald, M, Downing, K, et al. Important knowledge for parent of children with heart disease: parent, nurse, and physician views. Cardiol Young 2015; 26: 61–69.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vigna, K, Balakas, K, Strurer, LM, Ercole, PA. Improving discharge to home experience for pediatric heart center patients and families. J Pediatr Nurs 2018; 41: 42–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hehir, DA, Ghanayem, NS. Single ventricle infant home monitoring programs: outcomes and impact. Curr Opin Cardiol 2013; 28: 97–102.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dreyfuss, H. Designing for People. Simon and Schuster, New York, 1955.Google Scholar
Cagan, J, Vogel, C. Creating Breakthrough Products, 2nd edn. Pearson Education, New Jersey, 2013.Google Scholar
Use the Teach-Back Method: Tool #5. Content last reviewed November 6 2018. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD. https://www.ahrq.gov/professionals/quality-patient-safety/quality-resources/tools/literacy-toolkit/healthlittoolkit2-tool5.html Google Scholar
PowToon. Retrieved November 6, 2018, from https://www.powtoon.com/home/? Google Scholar
Berkman, ND, Sheridan, SL, Donahue, KE, et al. Health literacy interventions and outcomes: an updated systematic review. Evid Rep Technol Assess 2011; 199: 1–941.Google Scholar