Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T08:21:12.705Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Doppler evaluation of physiologic peripheral pulmonic stenosis in newborns

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 August 2008

Deborah M. Friedman ,
John Fernandes ,
Monika Rutkowski  and
Delores Danilowicz
Deborah M. Friedman*
Affiliation:
From the Division of Pediatric Cardiology, New York University Medical Center, New York
John Fernandes
Affiliation:
From the Division of Pediatric Cardiology, New York University Medical Center, New York
Monika Rutkowski
Affiliation:
From the Division of Pediatric Cardiology, New York University Medical Center, New York
Delores Danilowicz
Affiliation:
From the Division of Pediatric Cardiology, New York University Medical Center, New York
*
Dr.Deborah M.Friedman, Pediatric Cardiology, New York University Medical Center, 550 First Avenue, New York, New York 10016, USA. Tel. (212) 263-6459.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A common systolic ejection murmur of the neonate has been attributed to physiologic peripheral pulmonic stenosis. We investigated this auscultatory finding using duplex pulsed Doppler. Three groups of normal fuliterm neonates less than one week old were studied—10 without murmurs, 10 with grade 1/6 murmurs and nine with at least grade 2/6 murmurs. We measured the anatomical size and peak flow velocities in the main pulmonary artery and left and right branches, the peak velocity in the right ventricular outflow tract, and the bifurcation angle. Flow gradients were calculated as 4 (Vmax)2 Groups were compared by t-tests. A loud peripheral pulmonic stenosis murmur was associated with increased pulmonary artery velocities, with left pulmonary artery velocity the most discriminating variable (1.3 ± 0.29 vs 0.94 ± 0.19 m/s; p ≤ 0.05). Although the peak gradient never exceeded 12 mmHg, there was an increased gradient in the loud murmur group (8.7 ± 2.6 vs 5.7 ± 2.2 mmHg; p ≤ 0.05) which may even be underestimated by the lack of angle correction. The left pulmonary artery diameter was also larger in the loud murmur group, but there were no other anatomic or volumetric flow differences between groups. The soft murmur group could not be separated from normals. We conclude that Doppler techniques can confirm the physiologic basis of peripheral pulmonic stenosis murmurs.

Keywords

Doppler ultrasoundnewborn murmurperipheral pulmonic stenosis
Type
Original Articles
Information
Cardiology in the Young , Volume 2 , Issue 2 , April 1992 , pp. 179 - 183
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Danilowicz, DA, Rudolph, AM, Hoffman, JIE, Heymann, M. Physiologic pressure differences between main and branch pulmonary arteries in infants. Circulation 1972; 45: 410–419.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2.Danilowicz, D, Hoffman, JIE, Rudolph, AM. Serial studies of pulmonary stenosis in infancy and childhood. Br Heart J 1975; 37: 808–818.Google Scholar
3.Dunkle, LM, Rowe, RD. Transient murmurs simulating pul monary artery stenosis in premature infants. Am J Dis Child 1972; 124: 666–670.Google Scholar
4.Emmanouilides, GC, Baylen, BG. Pulmonary stenosis In: Adams, FH, Ernmanouilides, GC (eds). Moss’ Heart Disease in Infants, Children, and Adolescents. Third Edition. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, 1983, pp 256–257.Google Scholar
5.Loeber, CP, Goldberg, SJ, Allen, HD. Doppler echocardio-graphic comparison of flows distal to the four cardiac valves. J Am Colt Cardiol 1984; 4: 268–272.Google Scholar
6.Grenadier, E, Lima, CO, Allen, HD. Normal intracardiac and great vessel Doppler flow velocities in infants and children. J Am Coll Cardiol 1984; 4: 343–350.Google Scholar
7.Mahoney, LT, Coryell, KG, Lauer, RM. The newborn transitional circulation: A two-dimensional Doppler echocardio graphic study. J Am Coll Cardiol 1985; 6: 623–626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Lima, CO, Sahn, DJ, Valdes-Cruz, LM. Noninvasive prediction of transvalvular pressure gradient in patients with puimonic stenosis by quantitative two-dimensional echocardiographic Doppler studies. Circulation 1983; 67: 866–871.Google Scholar
9.Johnson, GL, Kwan, OL, Handshoe, S, Noonan, JA, DeMaria, AN. Accuracy of combined two-dimensional echocardio graphy and continuous wave Doppler recordings in the esti mation of pressure gradients in right ventricular outlet ob struction. J Am Coil Cardiol 1984; 3: 1013–1018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Kosturakis, D., Allen, HD, Goldberg, SJ, Sahn, DJ, Valdes-Cruz, LM. Noninvasive quantification of stenotic semilunar valve areas by Doppler echocardiography. J Am Coil Cardiol 1984; 3: 1256–1262.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11.Snider, AR, Stevenson, JG, French, JW. Comparison of high pulse repetition frequency and continuous wave Doppler echocardiography for velocity measurement and gradient prediction in children with valvular and congenital heart disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 1986; 7: 873–879.Google Scholar
12.Currie, PJ, Hagler, DJ, Seward, JB. Instantaneous pressure gradient. A simultaneous Doppler and dual catheter correla tive study. J Am Coil Cardiol 1986; 7: 800–806.Google Scholar
13.Frantz, EG, Silverman, NH. Doppler ultrasound evaluation of valvular puimonic stenosis from multiple transducer positions in children requiring pulmonary valvuloplasty. Am J Cardiol 1988; 61: 844–849.Google Scholar
14.Murphy, DJ, Ludomirsky, A, Danford, DA, Huhta, JC. Doppler echocardiography in pulmonary stenosis. Echocardiography 1987; 6: 187–202.Google Scholar
15.Rodríguez, RJ, Riggs, TW. Physiologic peripheral pulmonic stenosis in infancy. Am J Cardiol 1990; 66: 1478–1481.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed