Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T08:01:07.405Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects of positive pressure ventilation and inspired oxygen on pulmonary vascular resistance and tissue oxygen delivery in neonatal pigs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 August 2008

Flemming Ransbæk
Affiliation:
Department of Surgery and Department of Pediatrics, University of Louisville, Louisville KY, USA
Soren B Hansen
Affiliation:
Department of Surgery and Department of Pediatrics, University of Louisville, Louisville KY, USA
Erle H. Austin III*
Affiliation:
Department of Surgery and Department of Pediatrics, University of Louisville, Louisville KY, USA
William P. Santamore
Affiliation:
Department of Surgery and Department of Pediatrics, University of Louisville, Louisville KY, USA
*
Erie H Austin III, MD Department of Surgery, Division of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY 40292. Tel: (502) 561-2180 Fax: (502) 561-2190

Abstract

Management of pulmonary vascular resistance in neonates with congenital heart disease is important for stabilization before and after surgical interventions. Thus, we determined which combina tion of positive end-expiratory pressure ventilation and fraction of oxygen in the inspired air increases pulmonary vascular resistance without compromising delivery of oxygen to the tissue. Eight piglets were anesthetized, intubated and ventilated. Pulmonary flow and pulmonary arterial and left atrial pressures were monitored continuously. At all levels of inspired oxygen (1.00, 0.21 and 0.15), ventilation at a pressure of 15 cm of water increased pulmonary vascular resistance. At all levels of positive pressure ventilation, a fraction of 0.15 of inspired oxygen increased pulmonary vascular resistance. The combination of a ventilatory pressure of 15 cm of water and inspired oxygen of 1.00, or ventilatory pressure at 5 cm of water and oxygen delivery of 0.15, produced similar changes in pulmonary vascular resistance (19.1 ± 2.8 vs. 20.0 ± 3.8 mmHg/(L/min)) and cardiac output (0.78 ± 0.07 vs. 0.93 ± 0.10 L/min) but, the higher level of positive pressure plus 1.00 inspired oxygen gave a significantly higher arterial oxygen saturation (0.99 ± 0.03 vs. 0.72 ± 0.19%) and delivery of oxygen to the tissues (13.7 ± 2.9 vs. 7.4 ± 1.5 ml 02/min, p<0.05). Thus, both high positive pressure ventilation and hypoxia increase pulmonary vascular resistance. Only high pressure ventilation plus high concentrations of inspired oxygen, however, increased pulmonary vascular resistance without compromising delivery of oxygen, suggesting that this combination is a superior means of increasing pulmonary vascular resistance.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Callow, LB. Current strategies in the nursing care of infants with hypoplastic left-heart syndrome undergoing first-stage palliation with the Norwood operation. Heart and Lung 1992; 21:463470.Google ScholarPubMed
2. Gustafson, RA,Murray, GF,Warden, HE,Hill, RC, Rozar, GE. Stage I palliation of hypoplastic left heart syndrome: The importance of neoaorta construction. Ann Thorac Surg 1989; 48: 4350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Malcic, I, Hecimovic, Z, Shala, H, Jelic, I, Drinkovic, N. Relation between the size of the left-right shunt and pulmonary resistance in congenital heart defects. Lijec Vjesn 1993; 115: 215220.Google ScholarPubMed
4. Morray, JP, Lynn, AM, Mansfield, PB. Effect of pH and Pco2 on pulmonary and systemic hemodynamics after surgery in children with congenital heart disease and pulmonary hypertension. J Pediatr 1988; 113: 474479.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5. Rendas, A, Branthwaite, M, Lennox, S, Reid, L. Response of the pulmonary circulation to acute hypoxia in the growing pig. J AppI Physiol 1982; 52:811814.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6. Domino, KB, Pinsky, MR. Effect of positive end-expiratory pressure on hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction in the dog. AmJ Physiol 1990; 259: H697H705.Google ScholarPubMed
7. Viles, PH, Shepherd, JT. Relationship between pH, Po and Pco on the pulmonary vascular bed of the cat. AmJ Physiol 1968; 215: 11701176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Voelkel, NFMechanisms of hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction [review] Am Rev Respir Dis 1986; 133: 11861195.Google ScholarPubMed
9. Johnston, WE, Vinten-Johansen, J, Santamore, WP, Case, LD, Little, WC. Mechanism of reduced cardiac output during positive end-expiratory pressure in the dog. Am Rev Respir Dis 1989; 140:12571264.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10. Von Euler, US, Liljestrand, G. Observations on the pulmonary arterial blood pressure in the cat. Acta Physiol Scand 1946; 12: 301320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Motley, HL, Cournand, A, Werko, L, Himmeistein, A, Dresdale, D. The influence of short periods of induced acute anoxiaupon pulmonary artery pressures in man. AmJ Physiol 1947; 150: 315320.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12. Lloyd, TC. Effect of alveolar hypoxia on pulmonary vascular resistance.J AppI Physiol 1964; 19: 10861094.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13. Marshall, C, Lindgren, L, and Marshall, BE. Metabolic and respiratory hydrogen ion effects on hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction. J AppI Physiol 1984; 57: 545550.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14. Hyman, AL, Kadowitz, PJ. Effects of alveolar and perfusion hypoxia and hypercapnia on pulmonary vascular resistance in the lamb. AmJ Physiol 1975; 228: 397403.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15. Cross, KW, Dawes, GS, Mott, JC. Anoxia, oxygen consumption and cardiac output in new-born lambs and adult sheep. J Physiol (London) 1959; 146:316343.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16. Hill, JR. The oxygen consumption of new-born and adult mammals. Its dependence on the oxygen tension in the inspired air and on the environmental temperature. J Physiol(London) 1959; 149:346373.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17. Benumof, JL, Rogers, SN, Moyce, PR, Berryhill, RE, Wahrenbrock, EA, Saidman, U. Hypoxic pulmonaryvasoconstriction and regional and whole-lung PEEP in the dog. Anesthesiology 1979; 51:503507.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18. Lejeune, P, Vachiery, JL, De Smet, JM, Leeman, M, Brimioulle, S, Delcroix, M, Melot, C, Naeije, R. PEEP inhibits hypoxicpulmonary vasoconstriction in dogs. J AppI Physiol 1991;70:1867–1873.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19. Sylvester, JT, Mitzner, W, Ngeow, Y, and Permutt, S. Hypoxicconstriction of alveolar and extra-alveolar vessels in isolatedpig lungs.J AppI Physiol 1983; 54: 16601666.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20. Cilley, RE, Scharenberg, AM, Bongiorno, PF, Guire, KE, Bartlett, RH. Low oxygen delivery produced by anemia, hypoxia, and low cardiac output. J Surg Res 1991; 51: 425433.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21. Groeneveld, AB, Vermeij, CG, Thijs, LG. Arterial and mixedvenous blood acid-base balance during hypoperfusion withincremental positive end-expiratory pressure in the pig. Anesth Analg 1991; 73:576582.Google Scholar
22. Lurch, JS, Murray, JF. Continuous positive-pressureventilation: effects on systemic oxygen transport and tissueoxygenation. Ann Intern Med 1972; 76:193202.Google Scholar
23. Suter, PM, Fairley, HB, Isenberg, MD. Optimumend-expiratory airway pressure in patients with acutepulmonary failure. N EnglJ Med 1975; 292:284289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24. Wallis, TW, Robotham, JL, Compean, R, Kindred, MK. Mechanical heart-lung interaction with positive endexpiratory pressure. J AppI Physiol 1983; 54:10391047.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25. Barnea, O, Austin, EH, Richman, B, Santamore, WP. Balancingthe circulation: Theoretic optimization of pulmonary systemic flow ratio in hypoplastic left heart syndrome. J AmCoil Cardiol 1994; 24:1376–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26. Rossi, AF, Sommer, RJ et al. ,: Usefulness of IntermittentMonitoring of Mixed Venous Oxygen Saturation After StageI Palliation for Hypoplastic Left Heart Syndrome. Am JCardiol 1994; 73: 11181123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar