Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-11T01:04:03.571Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Haemodynamic impact of stent implantation for lateral tunnel Fontan stenosis: a patient-specific computational assessment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2015

Elaine Tang
Affiliation:
School of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, United States of America
Doff B. McElhinney
Affiliation:
Department of Cardiology, Boston Children’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America
Maria Restrepo
Affiliation:
The Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology & Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America
Anne M. Valente
Affiliation:
Department of Cardiology, Boston Children’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America
Ajit P. Yoganathan*
Affiliation:
The Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology & Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America
*
Correspondence to: A. P. Yoganathan, Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology & Emory University, Technology Enterprise Park, Suite 200, 387 Technology Circle, Atlanta, GA 30313-2412, United States of America. Tel: +1 404-894-2849; Fax: +1 404-385-1268; E-mail: ajit.yoganathan@bme.gatech.edu

Abstract

Background

The physiological importance of the lateral tunnel stenosis in the Fontan pathway for children with single ventricle physiology can be difficult to determine. The impact of the stenosis and stent implantation on total cavopulmonary connection resistance has not been characteriszed, and there are no clear guidelines for intervention.

Methods and results

A computational framework for haemodynamic assessment of stent implantation in patients with lateral tunnel stenosis was developed. Cardiac magnetic resonances images were reconstructed to obtain total cavopulmonary connection anatomies before stent implantation. Stents with 2-mm diameter increments were virtually implanted in each patient to understand the impact of stent diameter. Numerical simulations were performed in all geometries with patient-specific flow rates. Exercise conditions were simulated by doubling and tripling the lateral tunnel flow rate. The resulting total cavopulmonary connection vascular resistances were computed. A total of six patients (age: 14.4±3.1 years) with lateral tunnel stenosis were included for preliminary analysis. The mean baseline resistance was 1.54±1.08 WU·m2 and dependent on the stenosis diameter. It was further exacerbated during exercise. It was observed that utilising a stent with a larger diameter lowered the resistance, but the resistance reduction diminished at larger diameters.

Conclusions

Using a computational framework to assess the severity of lateral tunnel stenosis and the haemodynamic impact of stent implantation, it was observed that stenosis in the lateral tunnel pathway was associated with higher total cavopulmonary connection resistance than unobstructed pathways, which was exacerbated during exercise. Stent implantation could reduce the resistance, but the improvement was specific to the minimum diameter.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Restrepo, M, Mirabella, L, Tang, E, et al. Fontan pathway growth: a quantitative evaluation of lateral tunnel and extracardiac cavopulmonary connections using serial cardiac magnetic resonance. Ann Thorac Surg 2014; 97: 916922.Google Scholar
2. Mets, JM, Bergersen, L, Mayer, JEJ, Marshall, AC, McElhinney, DB. Outcomes of stent implantation for obstruction of intracardiac lateral tunnel Fontan pathways. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2013; 6: 92100.Google Scholar
3. Ovroutski, S, Ewert, P, Alexi-Meskishvili, V, Peters, B, Hetzer, R, Berger, F. Dilatation and stenting of the Fontan pathway: impact of the stenosis treatment on chronic ascites. J Interv Cardiol 2008; 21: 3843.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4. Kaulitz, R, Ziemer, G, Paul, T, Peuster, M, Bertram, H, Hausdorf, G. Fontan-type procedures: residual lesions and late interventions. Ann Thorac Surg 2002; 74: 778785.Google Scholar
5. KrishnankuttyRema, R, Dasi, LP, Pekkan, K, et al. Quantitative analysis of extracardiac versus intraatrial Fontan anatomic geometries. Ann Thorac Surg 2008; 85: 810817.Google Scholar
6. Tang, E, Restrepo, M, Haggerty, C, et al. Geometric characterization of patient specific total cavopulmonary connections and its relationship to hemodynamics. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2014; 7: 215224.Google Scholar
7. van Brakel, TJ, Schoof, PH, de Roo, F, Nikkels, PGJ, Evens, FCM, Haas, F. High incidence of Dacron conduit stenosis for extracardiac Fontan procedure. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2014; 147: 15681572.Google Scholar
8. Itatani, K, Miyaji, K, Tomoyasu, T, et al. Optimal conduit size of the extracardiac Fontan operation based on energy loss and flow stagnation. Ann Thorac Surg 2009; 88: 565572.Google Scholar
9. Whitehead, KK, Pekkan, K, Kitajima, HD, Paridon, SM, Yoganathan, AP, Fogel, MA. Nonlinear power loss during exercise in single-ventricle patients after the Fontan: insights from computational fluid dynamics. Circulation 2007; 116: I165I171.Google Scholar
10. Sundareswaran, KS, Pekkan, K, Dasi, LP, et al. The total cavopulmonary connection resistance: a significant impact on single ventricle hemodynamics at rest and exercise. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2008; 295: H2427H2435.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11. Frakes, DH, Conrad, CP, Healy, TM, et al. Application of an adaptive control grid interpolation technique to morphological vascular reconstruction. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2003; 50: 197206.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12. Frakes, DH, Smith, MJ, Parks, J, Sharma, S, Fogel, M, Yoganathan, AP. New techniques for the reconstruction of complex vascular anatomies from MRI images. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2005; 7: 425432.Google Scholar
13. Frakes, D, Smith, M, de Zelicourt, D, Pekkan, K, Yoganathan, A. Three-dimensional velocity field reconstruction. J Biomech Eng 2004; 126: 727735.Google Scholar
14. Sundareswaran, KS, Frakes, DH, Fogel, MA, Soerensen, DD, Oshinski, JN, Yoganathan, AP. Optimum fuzzy filters for phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging segmentation. J Magn Reson Imaging 2009; 29: 155165.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15. de Zélicourt, D, Ge, L, Wang, C, Sotiropoulos, F, Gilmanov, A, Yoganathan, A. Flow simulations in arbitrarily complex cardiovascular anatomies – an unstructured cartesian grid approach. Comput Fluids 2009; 38: 17491762.Google Scholar
16. Tang, E, Haggerty, CM, Khiabani, RH, et al. Numerical and experimental investigation of pulsatile hemodynamics in the total cavopulmonary connection. J Biomech 2013; 46: 373382.Google Scholar
17. Khiabani, RH, Whitehead, KK, Han, D, et al. Exercise capacity in single-ventricle patients after Fontan correlates with haemodynamic energy loss in TCPC. Heart 2015; 101: 139143.Google Scholar
18. Khairy, P, Fernandes, SM, Mayer, JEJ, et al. Long-term survival, modes of death, and predictors of mortality in patients with Fontan surgery. Circulation 2008; 117: 8592.Google Scholar
19. Amodeo, A, Galletti, L, Marianeschi, S, et al. Extracardiac Fontan operation for complex cardiac anomalies: seven years’ experience. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1997; 114: 10201031.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20. Ochiai, Y, Imoto, Y, Sakamoto, M, et al. Mid-term follow-up of the status of Gore-Tex graft after extracardiac conduit Fontan procedure. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2009; 36: 6368.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21. Lee, C, Lee, C-H, Hwang, SW, et al. Midterm follow-up of the status of Gore-Tex graft after extracardiac conduit Fontan procedure. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2007; 31: 10081012.Google Scholar
22. Pennati, G, Corsini, C, Cosentino, D, et al. Boundary conditions of patient-specific fluid dynamics modelling of cavopulmonary connections: possible adaptation of pulmonary resistances results in a critical issue for a virtual surgical planning. Interface Focus 2011; 1: 297307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23. Marsden, AL, Vignon-Clementel, IE, Chan, FP, Feinstein, JA, Taylor, CA. Effects of exercise and respiration on hemodynamic efficiency in CFD simulations of the total cavopulmonary connection. Ann Biomed Eng 2007; 35: 250263.Google Scholar
24. Hjortdal, VE, Emmertsen, K, Stenbog, E, et al. Effects of exercise and respiration on blood flow in total cavopulmonary connection: a real-time magnetic resonance flow study. Circulation 2003; 108: 12271231.Google Scholar
25. Cordina, RL, O’Meagher, S, Karmali, A, et al. Resistance training improves cardiac output, exercise capacity and tolerance to positive airway pressure in Fontan physiology. Int J Cardiol 2013; 168: 780788.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
26. Dasi, LP, Whitehead, K, Pekkan, K, et al. Pulmonary hepatic flow distribution in total cavopulmonary connections: extracardiac versus intracardiac. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2011; 141: 207214.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Tang supplementary material

Tang supplementary material 1

Download Tang supplementary material(File)
File 44.8 KB