Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T01:46:56.787Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Influence of CHDs on psycho-social and neurodevelopmental outcomes in children with Down syndrome

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 February 2015

Jeannie Visootsak ,
Lillie Huddleston ,
Allison Buterbaugh ,
Adrienne Perkins ,
Stephanie Sherman  and
Jessica Hunter
Jeannie Visootsak*
Affiliation:
Department of Human Genetics, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America Department of Pediatrics, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America
Lillie Huddleston
Affiliation:
Department of Human Genetics, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America
Allison Buterbaugh
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatrics, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America
Adrienne Perkins
Affiliation:
Department of Human Genetics, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America
Stephanie Sherman
Affiliation:
Department of Human Genetics, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America
Jessica Hunter
Affiliation:
Department of Human Genetics, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America
*
Correspondence to: J. Visootsak, MD, Department of Human Genetics, Emory University, 2165 N. Decatur Road, Decatur, GA 30033, United States of America. Tel: +1 404 778 8590; Fax: +1 404 778 8562; E-mail: Jvisoot@emory.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the family psycho-social outcomes of children with Down syndrome and atrioventricular septal defect, and examine the impact of these variables on the child’s neurodevelopmental outcome.

Methods

This was a cross-sectional study that consisted of 57 children with Down syndrome – 20 cases and 37 controls – of ~12–14 months of age. In both groups, we assessed the development of the child, the quality of the child’s home environment, and parenting stress.

Results

Compared with the Down syndrome without CHD group, the atrioventricular septal defect group revealed lower scores in all developmental domains, less optimal home environments, and higher parental stress. Significant differences in development were seen in the areas of cognition (p=0.04), expressive language (p=0.05), and gross motor (p<0.01). The Home Observation for Measurement of the Environment revealed significant differences in emotional and verbal responsiveness of the mother between the two groups. The Parenting Stress Index revealed that the Down syndrome with atrioventricular septal defect group had a significantly higher child demandingness subdomain scores compared with the Down syndrome without CHD group.

Conclusions

The diagnosis of a CHD in addition to the diagnosis of Down syndrome may provide additional stress to the child and parents, elevating parental concern and disrupting family dynamics, resulting in further neurodevelopmental deficits. Finding that parental stress and home environment may play a role in the neurodevelopmental outcomes may prompt new family-directed interventions and anticipatory guidance for the families of children with Down syndrome who have a CHD.

Keywords

Down syndromeCHDsneurodevelopmental outcomespsychosocial
Type
Original Articles
Information
Cardiology in the Young , Volume 26 , Issue 2 , February 2016 , pp. 250 - 256
Check for updates
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Parker, SE, Mai, CT, Canfield, MA, et al. Updated national birth prevalence estimates for selected birth defects in the United States, 2004-2006. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol 2010; 88: 1008–1016.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2. Freeman, SB, Taft, LF, Dooley, KJ, et al. Population-based study of congenital heart defects in Down syndrome. Am J Med Genet 1998; 80: 213–217.3.0.CO;2-8>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3. Stoll, C, Alembik, Y, Dott, B, Roth, MP. Study of Down syndrome in 238,942 consecutive births. Ann Genet 1998; 41: 44–51.Google Scholar
4. Torfs, CP, Christianson, RE. Anomalies in Down syndrome individuals in a large population-based registry. Am J Med Genet 1998; 77: 431–438.3.0.CO;2-J>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Freeman, SB, Bean, LH, Allen, EG, et al. Ethnicity, sex, and the incidence of congenital heart defects: a report from the National Down Syndrome Project. Genet Med 2008; 10: 173–180.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6. Wells, G, Barker, SE, Finley, SC, et al. Congenital heart disease in infants with Down’s syndrome. South Med J 1994; 87: 724–727.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7. Ferencz, C, Neill, CA, Boughman, JA, et al. Congenital cardiovascular malformations associated with chromosome abnormalities: an epidemiologic study. J Pediatr 1989; 114: 79–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8. Loffredo, CA, Hirata, J, Wilson, PD, et al. Atrioventricular septal defects: possible etiologic differences between complete and partial defects. Teratology 2001; 63: 87–93.3.0.CO;2-5>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9. Kerstann, KF, Feingold, E, Freeman, SB, et al. Linkage disequilibrium mapping in trisomic populations: analytic approaches and an application to congenital heart defects in Down syndrome. Genet Epidemiol 2004; 27: 240–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Englund, A, Jonsson, B, Zander, CS, et al. Changes in mortality and causes of death in the Swedish Down syndrome population. Am J Med Genet 2013; 161A: 642–649.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11. Baird, PA, Sadnovnick, AD. Life expectancy in Down syndrome. J Pediatr 1987; 110: 849–854.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12. Mathew, P, Moodie, D, Sterba, R, et al. Long-term follow-up of children with Down syndrome with cardiac lesions. Clin Pediatr 1990; 29: 569–574.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13. Bando, K, Turrentine, MW, Sun, K, et al. Surgical management of complete atrioventricular septal defects. A twenty-year experience. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1995; 110: 1543–1554.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14. Dunlop, KA, Mulholland, HC, Casey, FA, et al. A ten year review of atrioventricular septal defects. Cardiol Young 2004; 14: 15–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Frid, C, Bjokhem, G, Jonzon, A, et al. Long-term survival in children with atrioventricular septal defect and common atrioventricular valvar orifice in Sweden. Cardiol Young 2004; 14: 24–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16. Malec, E, Mrozcek, T, Pajak, J, et al. Results of surgical management of congenital heart defects in children with Down’s syndrome. Pediatr Cardiol 1999; 20: 351–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. Gaynor, JW, Ittenbach, RF, Gerdes, M, et al. Neurodevelopmental outcomes in preschool survivors of the Fontan procedure. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2014; 147: 1276–1282.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18. Tabbutt, S, Gaynor, JW, Newburger, JW. Neurodevelopmental outcomes after congenital heart surgery and strategies for improvement. Curr Opin Cardiol 2012; 27: 82–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19. Mahle, WT, Visconti, KJ, Freier, MC, et al. Relationship of surgical approach to neurodevelopmental outcomes in hypoplastic left heart syndrome. Pediatrics 2006; 117: e90–e97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20. Visootsak, J, Mahle, WT, Kirshbom, PM, et al. Neurodevelopmental outcomes in children with Down syndrome and congenital heart defects. Am J Med Genet A 2011; 155: 2688–2691.Google Scholar
21. Visootsak, J, Hess, B, Bakeman, R, et al. Effect of congenital heart defects on language development in toddlers with Down syndrome. J Intellect Disabil Res 2012; 57: 887–892.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22. Bayley, N. Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, 3rd edn. Harcourt Assessment Inc., San Antonio, Texas, 2006.Google Scholar
23. Abidin, R. Parenting Stress Index: Professional Manual, 3rd edn. Psychological Assessment Resources Inc., Odessa, Florida, 1995.Google Scholar
24. Caldwell, B, Bradley, R. Manual for the Home Observation for Measurement of the Environment. University of Arkansas, Little Rock, Arkansas, 1984.Google Scholar
25. Gentile, JK, Tan, WH, Horowitz, LT, et al. A neurodevelopmental survey of Angelman syndrome with genotype-phenotype correlations. J Dev Behav Pediatr 2010; 31: 592–601.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
26. Goldstein, DJ, Sheaffer, CI. Ratio developmental quotients from the Bayley are comparable to later IQs from the Stanford-Binet. Am J Ment Retard 1988; 92: 379–380.Google ScholarPubMed
27. McCusker, CG, Doherty, NN, Molloy, B, et al. A randomized controlled trial of interventions to promote adjustment in children with congenital heart disease entering school and their families. J Pediatr Psychol 2012; 37: 1089–1103.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
28. Brosig, CL, Mussatto, KA, Kuhn, EM, et al. Psychosocial outcomes for preschool children and families after surgery for complex congenital heart disease. Pediatr Cardiol 2007; 28: 255–262.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed