Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T06:20:08.789Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Report of the Coding Committee of the Association for European Paediatric Cardiology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 July 2009

Rodney C. G. Franklin*
Affiliation:
London, UK
Robert H. Anderson
Affiliation:
London, UK
Otto Daniëls
Affiliation:
Nejmegen, The Netherlands
Martin J. Elliott
Affiliation:
London, UK
Marc H. M. L. Gewillig
Affiliation:
Leuven, Belgium
Renzo Ghisla
Affiliation:
Zurich, Switzerland
Otto N. Krogmann
Affiliation:
Duisburg, Germany
Herbert E. Ulmer
Affiliation:
Heidelberg, Germany
Franco P. Stocker
Affiliation:
Chairman, Bern, Switzerland
*
Correspondence to: Dr Rodney CG Franklin, Paediatric Cardiologist, Harefleld Site, Royal Brompton and Harefleld NHS Trust, Harefleld, Middlesex UB9 6JH, UK. Tel/fax: 01895 828659; E-mail: r.franklin@rbh.nthames.nhs.uk

Extract

IN 1999 AND EARLY 2000, THE ASSOCIATION FOR European Paediatric Cardiology published the European Paediatric Cardiac Code as independent but linked Short and Long Lists, containing 650 and 3876 primary terms respectively. The historical background and rationale for development of this coding system has been previously detailed, but essentially it followed a series of meeting of the coding committee of the Association between 1997–1999, during which a pre-existing Long List was adopted and then used to create the condensed Short List. The system was published as the recommended standard coding system for use across Europe, covering the diagnosis and therapy of children with congenital and acquired cardiac disease. The scope of the lists was to encompass the needs of all those involved with such patients, from the fetal cardiologist through to the specialist in adult congenital heart disease; and from the general paediatric cardiologist and cardiac surgeon, to those specialising in transcatheter interventions, paediatric electrophysiology, and paediatric echocardiographers. In addition, the code was crossmapped to the 9th and 10th revisions of the International Classification of Diseases (“ICD-9” and “ICD-10”) provided by the World Health Organisation in order to facilitate returns to central government, a requirement in most countries. In so doing, it was hoped to address the concerns of many centres that such information submitted by professional coding staff was often inaccurate due to the complex nature of congenital cardiac disease, together with the limited scope and vague terminology of the International listings.

Type
The European Paediatric Cardiac Code: The First Revision
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Fanklin, RCG, Anderson, RH, Daniëls, O, et al. The European Paediatric Cardiac Code. Cardiol Young 1999; 9: 633657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Association for European Paediatric Cardiology. The European Paediatric Cardiac Code. Cardiol Young 2000; 10 (Suppl. 1): 1146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.The Bristol Royal Infirmary Inquiry. The inquiry into the management of care of children receiving complex heart surgery at the Bristol Royal Infirmary. www.bristol-inquiry.org.uk.Google Scholar
4.Smith, R.All changed, changed utterly. Brit Med J 1998; 316: 19171918.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5.Spiegelhalter, DJ.Mortality and volume of cases in paediatric cardiac surgery: retrospective study based on routinely collected data. Brit Med J 2002; 324: 261264.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6.Aylin, P, Alves, B, Best, N, et al. Comparison of UK paediatric cardiac surgical performance by routinely collected data 1984–96: was Bristol an outlier? Lancet 2001; 358: 181187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Mavroudis, C, Jacobs, JP. Congenital heart disease outcome anaysis: Methodology and rationale. J Thor Cardiovasc Surg 2002; 123: 67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Bonnet, D, Coltri, A, Butera, G, et al. Detection of transposition of the great arteries in fetuses reduces neonatal morbidity and mortality. Circulation 1999; 99: 916918.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9.Congenital Heart Surgery Nomenclature and Database Project. Ann Thorac Surg 2000; 69(4) (Suppl. 1): 1372.Google Scholar
10.Maruszewski, B, Lacour-Gayet, F, Elliott, MJ, et al. Congenital Heart Surgery Nomenclature and Database Project: update and proposed data harvest. Eur J Cardiothor Surg 2002; 21: 4749.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11.Béland, M, Jacobs, JP, Tchervenkov, CI, Franklin, RCG. The International Nomenclature Project for Paediatric and Congenital Heart Disease. Report from the Executive of the International Working Group for Mapping and Coding of Nomenclatures for Paediatric and Congenital Heart Disease. Cardiol Young 2002; 12: 425430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Franklin, RCG, Jacobs, JP, Tchervenkov, CI, Béland, M.Bidirectional Crossmap of the Short Lists of the European Paediatric Cardiac Code and the International Congenital Heart Surgery Nomenclature and Database Project. Report from the Executive of The International Working Group for Mapping and Coding of Nomenclatures for Paediatric and Congenital Heart Disease. Cardiol Young 2002; 12 (Suppl. 2): 1822.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed