Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T23:13:49.675Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Who's left holding the woman?: Practice issues facing hospital social workers working with women who have infants removed at birth by NSW Department of Community Services

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 February 2016

Michelle Wickham
Michelle Wickham*
Affiliation:
Women's Health Social Work Team, John Hunter Hospital, Newcastle, NSW, Email: michelle.wickham@hnehealth.nsw.gov.au
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Over the past three years, there has been a significant change in the focus of hospital social work intervention with pregnant women–from supportive counselling relating to motherhood, to systems advocacy within the child protection context.

Hospital social workers in this field have frequently been faced with the inevitable conflicting interests of supporting parents and protecting infants. However, the recent changes have thrown up various ethical questions, and issues of integrity and advocacy, in what is a complex area of practice.

This paper seeks to examine some of the current practice issues for social workers in this area. By examining the current context and literature, several practice themes will be considered and explored. In examining this issue at both the micro level of current hospital social work practice and the macro level of legislative and systemic issues, several best practice suggestions are considered within the context of the author's current workplace.

Type
Research Article
Information
Children Australia , Volume 34 , Issue 4 , 2009 , pp. 29 - 35
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Australian Association of Social Workers (1999) AASW Code of Ethics, AASW Australia.Google Scholar
Burgheim, T. (2005) ‘The grief of families whose children have been removed: Implications for workers in out of home care’, Developing Practice, Issue 13, Winter, 57–61.Google Scholar
Children and Young Persons (Care and Protection) Act 1998, NSW Parliamentary Counsel's Office.Google Scholar
Dale, P. (2004) ‘Like a fish in a bowl: Parents' perceptions of child protection services’, Child Abuse Review, Vol 13, 137–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dodson, M. (1999) ‘Indigenous children in care: On bringing them home’, Children Australia, Vol 24, No 4, 7–12.Google Scholar
Dumbrill, G. (2006) ‘Parental experience of child protection intervention: A qualitative study’, Child Abuse and Neglect, Vol 30, No 1, 27–37.Google Scholar
Fernandez, E. (1996) Significant harm: Unravelling child protection decisions and substitute care careers of children, Aldershot, UK.Google Scholar
MacKinnon, L.K. (1998), Trust and betrayal in the treatment of child abuse Guilford Press, New York.Google Scholar
Mendes, P. (1998) ‘Consumer groups in child protection: Enhancing the accountability of the system’, Children Australia, Vol 23, No 2, 33–38.Google Scholar
NSW Department of Community Services (2006) Statutory child protection in NSW: Issues and options for reform, NSW DoCS.Google Scholar
NSW Department of Health (2005) Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome Guidelines, Document Number PD 2005_494, <www.health.nsw.gov/policies/>..>Google Scholar
NSW Department of Health (2006) NSW Interagency Guidelines for Child Protection Intervention, Document Number PD 2006_104, <www.health.nsw.gov.au/policies/>..>Google Scholar
NSW Department of Health (2008) Safestart Guidelines.Google Scholar
NSW Ombudsman (2007) Report of reviewable deaths in 2006: Volume 2: Child deaths, NSW Ombudsman.Google Scholar
O'Neill, C. (2000) ‘Support, timelines and hard decisions’, Children Australia, Vol 25, No 4, 7–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Neill, C. (2005) ‘Christmas without the kids: Losing children through the child protection system’, Children Australia, Vol 30, No 4, 11–18.Google Scholar
Panozzo, S., Osborn, A. & Bromfield, L. (2007) Issues relating to reunification. National Child Protection Clearinghouse Research Brief No. 5, Australian Institute of Family Studies.Google Scholar
Parliament of New South Wales, 15th November, 2006, accessed 10th October, 2008. <http://www.parliament.nsw.gov.au/prod/parlment/hansart.nsf/V3Key/LC20061115041>>Google Scholar
Scott, T. & Honner, J. (2004) ‘The most enduring of relationships: Engaging families who have children in substitute care’, paper presented at ACWA conference Knowledge into Action: Effective practice for child and family services, Sydney.Google Scholar
Thomson, J. & Thorpe, R. (2003) ‘The importance of parents in the lives of children in the care system’, Children Australia, Vol 28, No 2, 25–31.Google Scholar
Thomson, J. & Thorpe, R. (2004) ‘Powerful partnerships in social work: Group work with parents of children in care’, Australian Social Work, Vol 57, No 1, 46–57.Google Scholar
Thorpe, R. (2008) ‘Family inclusion in child protection practice: Building bridges in working with (not against) families’, Communities Children and Families Australia, Vol 3, No 1, 4–18.Google Scholar
Tomison, A.M. (2002) ‘Evidence based practice in child protection: What do we know and how do we better inform practice?’, paper presented at ACWA conference What works? Evidence based practice in child and family services, Sydney.Google Scholar
Wickham, M. & Dimmock, M. (2007) John Hunter Hospital Assumption ofNewborns Pathway, John Hunter Hospital, Newcastle, NSW.Google Scholar