Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T17:40:00.332Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Parental drug and alcohol use as a contributing factor in applications to the Children's Court for protection orders

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 February 2016

Lindsay Leek
Affiliation:
Information, Research and Evaluation, Department for Child Protection, Perth, WA, Email: lindsay.leek@dcp.wa.gov.au
Diane Seneque
Affiliation:
ASSIST Support Team, Department for Child Protection, WA
Kaija Ward
Affiliation:
Information, Research and Evaluation, Department for Child Protection, WA

Abstract

Drug use has a significant negative impact on the ability of parents to provide safe care for children and an outcome of this is the entry of some of these children into out-of-home care. This poses particular challenges for service providers, not only because of the complex nature of addiction, but also the many other issues facing these families. This paper reports on studies conducted by the Western Australian Department for Community Development in 2004 and 2007 which explored parental drug and alcohol use as a contributing factor in applications to the Children's Court for protection orders. The results of the 2004 study showed that parental drug and alcohol use was the second most common contributing factor in protection applications after neglect. It was also confirmed that drug and alcohol use rarely occurs in isolation, with strong links identified to neglect and domestic violence, as well as other factors, including physical abuse and homelessness/transient lifestyle. The 2007 follow-up study further highlighted the co-existence of parental drug and alcohol use and domestic violence.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

AIHW—see Australian Institute of Health and WelfareGoogle Scholar
Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs (2003) Hidden harm — Responding to the needs of children of problem drug users: The report of an inquiry by the Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs, Home Office, London.Google Scholar
Araji, S. & Finkelhor, D. (1986) ‘Abusers: A review of the research’, in Finkelhor, D. (ed.), A sourcebook on child sexual abuse, Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, pp. 89118.Google Scholar
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (1995) National drug strategy household survey: Urban Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples supplement 1994, Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, Canberra.Google Scholar
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (2005) 2004 National drug strategy household survey: Detailed findings, Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, Canberra.Google Scholar
Baker, B, & Heller, T. (1996) ‘Preschool children with externalising behaviours: experience of fathers and mothers’, Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, vol. 24, pp. 513532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, L. (1997) ‘Service to parents who abuse substances: Literature to inform practice-research initiative’, Children Australia, vol 22, no.2, pp. 1927.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Department of Human Services Community Care Division (2002) An integrated strategy for child protection and placement services, Department of Human Services, Melbourne.Google Scholar
Drug Policy Expert Committee (2000) Drugs: Meeting the challenge, stage 2 report, Department of Human Services, Melbourne.Google Scholar
Farate, E. (2001) Prevalence of substance abuse in care and protection applications: A Western Australian study, Department for Community Development, Perth (unpublished).Google Scholar
Finnegan, L.P., Oehlberg, S.M., Regan, D.O. & Rudrauff, M.E. (1981) ‘Evaluation of parenting, depression and violence profiles in methadone maintained women’, Child Abuse and Neglect, vol. 5, pp. 267273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hans, S.L., Bernstein, V.J. & Henson, L.G. (1999) ‘The role of psychopathology in the parenting of drug-dependent women’, Development and Psychopathology, vol. 11, pp. 957977.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harwin, J. & Forrester, D. (2002) Parental substance misuse and child welfare: A study of social work with families in which parents misuse drugs or alcohol, first stage report for the Nuffield Foundation, London (unpublished).Google Scholar
Hegarty, M. (2004) Mind the gap: The National Illicit Drug Strategy project to improve support for children from families where there are mental illness and substance abuse (MISA) issues: Literature review, Department of Family and Community Services, Canberra.Google Scholar
Leek, L., Seneque, D. & Ward, K. (2004) Parental drug and alcohol use as a contributing factor in care and protection applications 2003, Department for Community Development, Perth.Google Scholar
Leek, L., Seneque, D. & Ward, K. (2007) Parental drug and alcohol use as a contributing factor in care and protection applications 2003: A follow-up study, Department for Community Development, Perth.Google Scholar
Loxley, W., Toumbourou, J.W., Stockwell, T., Haines, B., Scott, K., Godfrey, C., Waters, E., Patton, G., Fordham, R., Gray, D., Marshall, J., Ryder, D., Saggers, S., Sanci, L. & Williams, J. (2004) The prevention of substance use, risk and harm in Australia: A review of the evidence, Department of Health and Aging, Canberra.Google Scholar
National Health and Medical Research Council (2001) Australian alcohol guidelines: Health risks and benefits, National Health and Medical Research Council, Canberra.Google Scholar
Patton, N. (2003a) Parental drug use – the bigger picture: A review of the literature, The Mirabel Foundation, Melbourne.Google Scholar
Patton, N. (2003b) The effects of parental drug use: Children in kinship care: A review of the literature, The Mirabel Foundation, Melbourne.Google Scholar
Review Team (2002) ‘It's everyone's job to make sure I'm alright’: Report of the Child Protection Audit and Review, Scottish Executive, Edinburgh.Google Scholar