Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T08:32:57.007Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Kernmagnetische resonanzmessungen an Glaukoniten

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 July 2018

Ewald E. Kohler  and
P.K. Burkert
Ewald E. Kohler
Affiliation:
Lehrstuhl für Mineralogie der TU Miinchen
P.K. Burkert
Affiliation:
Anorganisch-chemisches Laboratorium der TU Miinchen 8000 München 2, Arcisstr 21, Deutschland
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Zusammenfassung

Bei der Untersuchung von 6 Glaukonitproben mit Hilfe der ‘H-Kernresonanz-Spektroskopie zeigen sich deutlich zwei verschieden gebundene OH-Gruppierungen. Wàhrend die relativ scharfen Signale A auf die in der Oktaederschicht flxierten zwei OH-Gruppen zuriickzufuhren sind, muB fiir die anderen OH-Gruppen des breiteren Signals B eine andere Bindungsnatur gefordert werden. Es ist móglich, dafl es sich bei den OH-Gruppen des Signals B ebenfalls um verschieden gebundene OH-Gruppen handelt und zwar um solche, die an Eisenhydroxid- Verunreinigungen gebunden sind und solche, die zwischenschichtlich in Form von Eisen-Hydroxo-Komplexen gebunden sind. Eine Unterscheidung zwischen letzteren beiden Mòglichkeiten ist aber nicht mòglich.

Abstract

Abstract

Examination of six glauconite samples by means of 1H-NMRspectroscopy shows two different kinds of OH-groups. One signal A is caused by OH-groups of the octahedral sheet. Another signal B must derive by bonds of other nature. It is possible that signal B represents OH-bonds of impurities as well as from interlayered hydroxy iron complexes. A more precise dissolution of signal B is not possible.

Abrege

Abrege

L'examen de six échantillons de glauconie au moyen de la spectroscopic 1H-NMR-révèle deux types différents de groupes OH. Un signal A provient de groupes OH de la feuille octaédrique. Un autre signal B doit dériver de liens d'autre nature. II est possible que le signal B représente des liens OH d'impuretés ainsi que de complexes de fer hydroxile en couches intermédiaires. Une dissolution plus précise du signal B est impossible.

Referata

Referata

El examen de seis muestras de glauconitas mediante espectroscopia de resonancia magnètica nuclear H1, muestra dos clases distintas de grupos OH. Una serial A es causada por grupos OH de la làmina octaédrica. Otra senal B debe derivarse por enlaces de otra naturaleza. Es posible que la serial B represente enlaces OH de impurezas asi corno de complejos de Fé hidroxi interestratificados. No es posible obtener una disolución mas precisa de la serial B.

Type
Research Article
Information
Clay Minerals , Volume 11 , Issue 4 , December 1976 , pp. 303 - 311
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literatur

Abudelgawad, G., Page, A.X. & Lund, L.L. (1975) Proc. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. 39, 567.Google Scholar
Alexiades, C.A. & Jackson (1966) Clays Clay Miner. 14, 35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Annersten, H. (1975) N. Jb. Miner. Mh. 8, 378.Google Scholar
Basset, W.A. (1960) Bull. geol. Soc. Am. 71, 449.Google Scholar
Blaine, R.L. (1961) Bull. Highway Res. Board 287, 44.Google Scholar
Brammall, A., Leech, J.G.C. & Bannister, F.A. (1937) Miner. Mag. 24, 507.Google Scholar
Brown, G. & Norrish, K. (1952) Miner. Mag. 29, 929.Google Scholar
Cloos, P., Fripiat, J.J. & Vielvoye, L. (1961) Soil Sci. 91, 55.Google Scholar
Ducros, P. & Dupont, M. (1962) C.r. Acad. Sci. Paris, 254, 1409.Google Scholar
Farmer, V.C., Russel, J.D., Ahlrichs, J.L. & Velde, B. (1967) Bull. Groupefr. Argiles 19, 2, 5.Google Scholar
Frey, M., Hunziker, J.C., Roggwüler, P. & Schindler, C. (1973) Contr. Miner. Petrol. 39, 185.Google Scholar
Foster, M.D. (1964) Prof. Pap. U.S. geol. Surv. 471-F, F1-F15.Google Scholar
Foster, M.D. (1964) Prof. Pap. U.S. geol. Suro. 614F, pp. 17.Google Scholar
Giese, R.F. Jr. (1975) Z. Kristallogr. 141, 138.Google Scholar
Giese, R.F. Jr. (1976) (in preparation).Google Scholar
Graham, J., Walker, G.F. & West, G.W. (1964) J. chem. Phys. 40, 540.Google Scholar
Hofmann, U.E., Fluck, E. & Kuhn, P. (1967) Angew. Chemie, Int. Ed. 6, 561.Google Scholar
Hower, J. & Mowatt, T.C. (1966) Am. Miner. 51, 825.Google Scholar
Joswig, W. (1972) N. Jb. Miner. Mh. 1, 1.Google Scholar
Koster, H.M. & Kohler, E.E. (1973) Geol. Rundschau 62, 521.Google Scholar
Kohler, E.E. & Koster, H.M. (1976) Clay Miner. 11, 273.Google Scholar
Lyon, R.J.P. (1964) In: Soil Clay Mineralogy. (Ed. by C.I. Rich & G.W. Kunze) Chap. VI, pp. 170. Chapel Hill University, North Carolina Press, North Carolina, U.S.A. Google Scholar
Manghnani, M.H. & Hower, J. (1964) Am. Miner. 49, 1631.Google Scholar
Marel, H.W. Van Der (1961) Acta Univ. Carol. Geol. Suppl. 1, 23.Google Scholar
Mauguin, C. (1928) C.r. Acad. Sci. Paris, 186, 879.Google Scholar
Moenke, H. (1966) Mineralspektren (Supplement) Akademie Veri. Berlin.Google Scholar
Pickett, A.G. & Lemcoe, M.M. (1959) J. geophys. Res. 64, 1579.Google Scholar
Rich, C.I. Von (1968) Clays Clay Miner. 16, 15.Google Scholar
Rothbauer, R. (1971) N. Jb. Miner. Mh. 4, 143.Google Scholar
Serratosa, J.M. & Bradley, W.F. (1958) J. phys. Chem. 62, 1164.Google Scholar
Thompson, G.R. & Hower, J. (1975) Geochim. Cosmochim Acta, 37, 1473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Touillaux, R., Salvador, P., Vanderneersch, C. & Fripiat, (1968) Israel J. Chem. 6, 337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valeton, I. & Abdul-Razzak, A. (1974) Mitt. Geol.-Paldont. Univ. Hamburg, 43, 85.Google Scholar
Wise, W.S. & Eugster, H.P. (1964) Am. Miner. 49, 1031.Google Scholar
Wu, T.H. (1964) J. geophys. Res. 69, 1083.Google Scholar
Wyckhoff, R.W.G. (1968) Crystal Structures. Interscience Pubi. John Wiley & Sons, London.Google Scholar