It seems obvious to most people that the brain and the rest of the body interact. Stress seems to worsen most general medical conditions, mortality is higher among widowers than married men, and almost everyone becomes moody when he or she has a viral infection. However, these are mostly anecdotal observations. The precise ways in which mind and body relate in health and disease is more elusive and, at times, controversial.

Perhaps the hardest evidence we have for a mind-body connection comes from studies showing that depression is an independent—and, surprisingly, quite a robust—risk factor for cardiovascular disease. Following acute coronary syndrome depression significantly worsens outcome, including increasing all-cause mortality rates.

Another well-documented finding, going in the opposite direction, is the high rate of depression experienced by those receiving α-interferon for the treatment of hepatitis C or malignant melanoma. Less secure is whether depression increases risk or worsens prognosis for cancer; why patients with schizophrenia are at greater risk for heart disease and cancer than the general population; if it is true that stress plays a role in exacerbations of multiple sclerosis; and what is the relationship between depression and the risk for Alzheimer's disease. In each there are conflicting epidemiological data and difficulties understanding the neural mechanisms that would broker the relationship between brain and targeted peripheral organ.

A 79-year-old woman is referred by her primary care physician for an evaluation regarding a possible psychiatric diagnosis. Until now, she has had an unremarkable medical and psychiatric history. For the past 4 months, the family has observed increasing confusion. She has been repeating statements that she has just made, evidences increasing forgetfulness, such as misplacing her keys and checkbook, and, on one occasion, went to the grocery store but could not remember which items she needed to purchase. There has also been a history of insomnia, some irritability, and she becomes agitated over trivial issues related to household activities. She has had a reduction in appetite and has lost 5 pounds. Furthermore, she has complained of fatigue and a decrease in energy. Her husband indicated that she rarely drinks alcohol. She has not mentioned suicidal ideation directly but she has become increasingly concerned that her affairs are in order. Two of her friends died in the previous year and one was admitted to a nursing home.

CNS Spectrums is an Index Medicos journal that publishes original scientific literature and reviews on a wide variety of neuroscientific topics of interest to the clinician on a monthly basis. Our mission is to provide physicians with an editorial package that will enhance and increase their understanding of neuropsychiatry; therefore, manuscripts that address crossover issues between neurology and psychiatry will be given immediate priority.

Systematic investigations indicate that some of the recognized psychiatric disorders can be identified among those with mental retardation due to chromosomal abnormalities. We report a psychotic patient with mild mental retardation (intelligence quotient: 68) and minor anomalies that had a chromosomal aberration not previously described in a psychotic patient. Our patient highlights the importance of the cytogenetic study in psychiatric patients with comorbid mental retardation or minor anomalies. In addition, her psychosis symptoms may be helpful to propose a new candidate gene for psychosis.

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is one of over 20 functional gastrointestinal disorders. There is considerable overlap of IBS with panic disorder as well as other anxiety disorders and depression. It has been proposed that the high prevalence of psychiatric disorders in clinical samples of IBS patients is a result of self-selection of individuals with anxiety and depression, which drives treatment-seeking behavior. Over the past several years, data from some community studies have shown that there is a high prevalence of psychiatric disorders in individuals with IBS who never sought treatment. This suggests that there may be a more fundamental linnk between IBS, anxiety and mood disorders, such as shared pathophysiology.

This month's issue of CNS Spectrums brings together reviews on the brain-gut axis, each of which provides a unique perspective, which is complementary to the other reviews.

Kirsten Tillisch, MD, and Emeran A. Mayer, MD, review the neurobiology of visceral sensation, focusing on visceral hyperalgesia in IBS. In their paper, the importance of expectancy, comorbidity, gender, and other issues on pain perception is discussed. One of the most fascinating points the authors make is that extra-intestinal functional disorders, such as fibromyalgia, which often coexists with IBS, may affect somatic perception and pain thresholds. The observation that these disorders not only co-exist, but can affect each other raises an important and often overlooked issue for researchers. Comorbid disorders should be assessed and taken into account when conducting studies in patients with IBS. The authors highlight advances in methodology and new conceptual frameworks for understanding the functional gastrointestinal disorders (FGIDs) as well as remaining gaps in our knowledge about visceral hyperalgesia.

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a functional gastrointestinal disorder characterized by chronic abdominal discomfort or pain in the absence of detectable organic disease. IBS is common and is associated with a significant impairment in health-related quality of life. Enhanced perception of visceral stimuli (“visceral hypersensitivity”) appears to be an important patho-physiological mechanism. Early IBS studies using functional brain imaging techniques suggest an alteration in central pain modulation circuits, rather than an increased sensitivity of peripheral visceral pain pathways. The frequent comorbidity with psychiatric disorders suggests the possibility of shared pathophysiological mechanisms and etiologic factors.

There is increasing evidence that supports the view that irritable bowel disorder (IBS) is a disorder of brain-gut function. Cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) has received increased attention in light of this recent shift in the conceptualization of IBS. This review has two main aims. The first is to provide a critical review of controlled trials on CBT for IBS. The second is to discuss ways of further developing CBT interventions that are more clinically relevant and meaningful to health care providers and individuals with a diagnosis of IBS. A theme from a CBT intervention will be presented to illustrate how CBT interventions can be incorporated within a larger social context. A review of CBT for IBS lends some limited support for improvement in some IBS symptoms and associated psychosocial distress. This conclusion needs to be expressed with some caution, however, in light of many methodological shortcomings including small sample sizes, inadequate control conditions and failure to identify primary versus secondary outcome measures. In addition, future studies will need to further develop more relevant CBT protocols that more fully integrate the patient's perspective and challenge social cognitions about this stigmatized disorder.

Since their introduction 50 years ago, antidepressants have been used in a wide variety of settings involving gastrointestinal (GI) disease. In the 1950s, antidepressants were shown to have some efficacy for the treatment of peptic ulcer disease. This is most likely due to their antihistaminic and anticholinergic effects. Since then, more efficacious and more disease-specific treatments have become available. In the last 20 years, antidepressants have been increasingly used for the treatment of functional gastrointestinal disorders such as irritable bowel syndrome, noncardiac chest pain, and other functional GI disorders. This article will review the rationale for the use of antidepressant drugs for the treatment of functional GI disorders. The role of psychiatric comorbidity in functional GI disorders, the impact of antidepressants on GI motility and visceral sensation, and the ability of these agents to produce improvements in the global well-being and overall quality of life will be reviewed. Finally, guidelines for prescribing and barriers to a patient's acceptance of these agents will be discussed.