No CrossRef data available.
Reply to Lawrence Resnick
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 13 April 2010
Extract
It is quite difficult to respond briefly and effectively to such a devastating charge as that the only merit your book has is that it is honest. My strategy will be, by showing that a few of Resnick's criticisms are ill-taken, to generate the presumption that the same could be said of a lot more of them. I will first discuss some minor points, and then two larger issues.
- Type
- Critical Notices/Etudes Critiques
- Information
- Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review / Revue canadienne de philosophie , Volume 27 , Issue 1 , Spring 1988 , pp. 157 - 161
- Copyright
- Copyright © Canadian Philosophical Association 1988