Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T20:00:37.219Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Comparison of resistance to third-generation cephalosporins in Shigella between Europe-America and Asia-Africa from 1998 to 2012

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

B. GU
Affiliation:
Department of Laboratory Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China National Key Clinical Department of Laboratory Medicine, Nanjing, China
M. ZHOU
Affiliation:
Department of Laboratory Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China National Key Clinical Department of Laboratory Medicine, Nanjing, China
X. KE
Affiliation:
Department of Laboratory Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China National Key Clinical Department of Laboratory Medicine, Nanjing, China
S. PAN*
Affiliation:
Department of Laboratory Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China National Key Clinical Department of Laboratory Medicine, Nanjing, China
Y. CAO
Affiliation:
Department of Laboratory Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China National Key Clinical Department of Laboratory Medicine, Nanjing, China
Y. HUANG
Affiliation:
Department of Laboratory Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China National Key Clinical Department of Laboratory Medicine, Nanjing, China
L. ZHUANG
Affiliation:
Department of Acute Infectious Disease Prevention and Control, Jiangsu Provincial Center for Disease Prevention and Control, Nanjing, China.
G. LIU
Affiliation:
Department of Laboratory Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China National Key Clinical Department of Laboratory Medicine, Nanjing, China
M. TONG
Affiliation:
Department of Laboratory Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China National Key Clinical Department of Laboratory Medicine, Nanjing, China
*
*Author for correspondence: Dr S. Pan, Department of Laboratory Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, 300 Guangzhou Road, Nanjing 210029, China. (Email: sypan@njmu.edu.cn)
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

We conducted a systematic review to compare resistance to third-generation cephalosporins (TGCs) in Shigella strains between Europe-America and Asia-Africa from 1998 to 2012 based on a literature search of computerized databases. In Asia-Africa, the prevalence of resistance of total and different subtypes to ceftriaxone, cefotaxime and ceftazidime increased markedly, with a total prevalence of resistance up to 14·2% [95% confidence interval (CI) 3·9–29·4], 22·6% (95% CI 4·8–48·6) and 6·2% (95% CI 3·8–9·1) during 2010–2012, respectively. By contrast, resistance rates to these TGCs in Europe-America remained relatively low – less than 1·0% during the 15 years. A noticeable finding was that certain countries both in Europe-America and Asia-Africa, had a rapid rising trend in the prevalence of resistance of S. sonnei, which even outnumbered S. flexneri in some periods. Moreover, comparison between countries showed that currently the most serious problem concerning resistance to these TGCs appeared in Vietnam, especially for ceftriaxone, China, especially for cefotaxime and Iran, especially for ceftazidime. These data suggest that monitoring of the drug resistance of Shigella strains should be strengthened and that rational use of antibiotics is required.

Type
Review Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

INTRODUCTION

As members of the Enterobacteriacae family, Shigella species can be classified into four major subtypes based on biochemical and serological characteristics, namely, S. dysenteriae, S. flexneri, S. boydii and S. sonnei, of which S. flexneri and S. sonnei are the most common strains [Reference Niyogi, Mitra and Dutta1Reference Chompook4]. Shigellosis is an acute enteric infection caused by Shigella species and is manifested by diarrhoea [Reference Yang5]. Acute diarrhoeal disease is a major public health problem throughout the world, with >2 million deaths occurring each year. It primarily affects children aged <5 years in developing countries [Reference Kosek, Bern and Guerrant6, Reference Bryce7]. About 164·7 million people suffer from bacillary dysentery annually worldwide, causing 0·6 million deaths, of which 60% were in children aged <5 years in developing countries [Reference Kotloff8Reference Sur10]. Although shigellosis is a self-limiting disease, antibiotic treatment is recommended because it can shorten the excretion time of the pathogen and reduce the duration of transmission rates [Reference Bhattacharya and Sur11].

However, since the first sulfa-resistant Shigella strain was reported in Japan in 1940, antimicrobial resistance has developed from single to multi-drug resistance in recent decades, thus resulting in reduced efficacy of antimicrobial therapies [Reference Watanabe12, Reference Sack13]. Shigella strains have progressively become resistant to most of the widely used and inexpensive antimicrobials, i.e. sulfonamides, tetracycline, ampicillin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, nalidixic acid and pivmecillinam, which have all in succession been used as first-line antimicrobial drugs in many parts of the world [Reference Watanabe12Reference Green and Tilloston15]. A significant increasing resistance was seen in quinolones and aminoglycosides, especially in Asia-Africa [Reference Gu16, Reference Gu17]. Third-generation cephalosporins (TGCs), with their wider antibacterial spectrum and stronger antibacterial activity compared with first- and second-generation cephalosporins, have shown good therapeutic effects against shigellosis. However, sporadic reports concerning resistance to TGCs have appeared [Reference Fortineau18Reference Taneja22].

The present study aims to analyse the prevalence and distribution of TGC-resistant Shigella worldwide using meta-analyses based on systematic review of articles published between January 1998 and December 2012. We also wish to provide recommendations for the empirical antibiotic therapy of shigellosis. Despite the profusion of reports from different parts of the world concerning trends in the antimicrobial resistance of Shigella, to the best of our knowledge, these were the first meta-analyses to compare the prevalence of resistance of Shigella strains between Europe-America and Asia-Africa and to provide information regarding useful antibiotic treatment for shigellosis.

METHODS

Search strategy

Two independent reviewers (B. Gu and M. Zhou) undertook a systematic literature review of potentially relevant studies that reported the prevalence of drug resistance associated with Shigella infections. Studies were identified using MEDLINE and EMBASE databases for data in articles reported from January 1998 to December 2012, and the bibliographies of identified articles. Random or fixed effects models were used, based on the P value considering the possibility of heterogeneity between studies for meta-analyses. Statistical analyses were undertaken using Stata v. 10.0 (StataCorp, USA). The search strategy used the following terms and connectors: ‘bacterial surveillance’ OR ‘antimicrobial resistance’ OR ‘bacterial resistance’ AND ‘Shigella’. The search was not restricted by language.

Selection of studies

Studies obtained from the literature search were checked by title and citation. If an article appeared relevant, the abstract was reviewed. Manuscripts with relevant abstracts were examined in full. The criteria for inclusion and exclusion of studies were established by the investigators before the literature was reviewed. Inclusion criteria were: Original article, Short communication, Correspondence or Letter which provided sufficient original data; all strains isolated from stools between 1998 and 2012. Exclusion criteria were: (i) irrelevant studies which focused on resistance mechanism or pathogen identification; (ii) animal or plant experiments; (iii) not isolated from humans; (iv) reviews and case reports; (v) does not include Shigella species; (vi) does not cover study drugs; (vii) does not provide specific data on prevalence of resistance ; (viii) not data from 1998 to 2012; (ix) not separated by region or year; (x) does not provide reliable information in full. The studies included were divided into five periods (1998–2000, 2001–2003, 2004–2006, 2007–2009, 2010–2012) for comparison between states and three periods (1998–2000, 2001–2006, 2007–2012) for comparison between countries to allow for analyses of trends based on the year in which shigella were isolated. Before we excluded studies, authors of such studies were contacted in an effort to obtain missing data. Disagreements between the two reviewers regarding standards for inclusion or exclusion were resolved by consensus.

Validity assessment

Studies were assessed for quality, with only high-quality studies included for analyses. High-quality studies were prospective cohort or retrospective consecutive cohort studies; provided basic data that included study period and area, total number tested and number of resistant strains; conducted a susceptibility test in accordance with guidelines established by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI); reported at least one of the three antimicrobials of interest (ceftriaxone, cefotaxime, ceftazidime) with quality control; included individuals who had no other infections except bacillary dysentery. Only one representative case for each outbreak was included unless the isolates had different patterns of antibiotic susceptibility. If studies overlapped, we included the more recent and larger study in the analyses. If the smaller study provided data not reported in the larger study, results were included for that specific variable.

Data extraction and statistical analyses

Data extraction was performed by two reviewers using a standardized extraction form. If there was disagreement, the relevant article was reviewed and differences resolved by consensus. Microsoft Excel v. 12.0 (Microsoft Corp., USA) was used for the entry and analyses of data. The possibility of significant heterogeneity between studies was tested with the Q test (P < 0·10 was considered indicative of significant heterogeneity), and random or fixed effects models were chosen according to the P value for meta-analyses. Freeman–Tukey arcsine transformations were performed to stabilize variances and, after the meta-analysis, investigators transformed the summary estimate and the confidence interval (CI) boundaries back to proportion using the sine function; the specific conversion details are given in reference [Reference Freeman23]. Data manipulation and statistical analyses were undertaken using Stata v. 10.0.

RESULTS

Results of the systematic literature search

We reviewed 4390 publications from MEDLINE and EMBASE databases reported from January 1998 to December 2012. Candidate articles are given in Supplementary Table S1. After scanning of the title and abstract, 491 articles were retrieved for detailed full-text intensive reading. Of these 492 articles, 179 did not cover the study drugs, 111 did not include Shigella species, 64 were not separated by time or year, 17 did not have secure sources of information, 16 did not provide specific prevalence of resistance. Finally, 104 studies concerning the resistance data of Shigella to TGCs based on inclusion and exclusion criteria (Fig. 1) were included.

Fig. 1. Results of the systematic literature search.

Studies considered for primary analysis

A total of 104 reports were included in the meta-analyses. Analyses were conducted across geographical areas, study years and different subtypes for selected primary endpoints. That is, the resistance of: Shigella to ceftriaxone, cefotaxime and ceftazidime; S. flexneri to ceftriaxone, cefotaxime and ceftazidime; and S. sonnei to ceftriaxone, cefotaxime and ceftazidime (Supplementary Table S1).

Comparison of the resistance of TGCs between Europe-America and Asia-Africa

Table 1 shows the comparison of the resistance of total Shigella isolates to ceftriaxone, cefotaxime and ceftazidime between European-American and Asian-African countries. As seen in the table, a lower average prevalence of ceftriaxone resistance was found in Europe-America countries (0·4%, 95% CI 0·2–0·6), with no large fluctuations. Data for 2010–2012 in Europe-America were not found. By contrast, the resistance to ceftriaxone in Asia–Africa during the study years showed an obvious upward trend, especially after 2007, reaching 14·2% (95% CI 3·9–29·4) during 2010–2012, 17·8 times greater than that found in 1998–2000. The average prevalence of resistance in Asia-Africa was 2·5% (95% CI 1·9–3·2), 6·3 times of that found in Europe-America.

Table 1. Resistance to ceftriaxone, cefotaxime and ceftazidime in Shigella spp. collected during 1998–2012

R, Resistance; CI, confidence interval; NR, no result.

Weight % refers to how much each row contributes to the ‘Overall’ row.

Slightly different from ceftriaxone, prevalence resistance to cefotaxime in Europe-America showed a noticeable upward trend after 2007, despite the relatively low total average prevalence of resistance of 0·1% (95% CI 0·0–0·4). The data for 2001–2003 and 2010–2012 in Europe-Africa areas were not found. Nevertheless, the prevalence of resistance to cefotaxime was markedly higher in Asia-Africa than in Europe-America, i.e. 3·7% (95% CI 2·4–5·2), 37·0 times that observed in Europe-America.

Similar to ceftriaxone, the prevalence of resistance to ceftazidime in Europe-America remained at a very low level, with an average prevalence of resistance being 0·2% (95% CI 0·0–0·5). However, there was a mild increasing trend of resistance during the study periods in Europe-America. The data for 2010–2012 in Europe-Africa were not obtained. With regard to Asia-Africa, analogously, resistance to ceftazidime was much more severe than that seen in Europe-America. The total average prevalence of resistance was 6·0% (95% CI 2·8–10·3), 30·0 times higher than that seen in Europe-America.

Comparison between S. flexneri and S. sonnei

The resistance patterns of S. flexneri and S. sonnei to ceftriaxone, cefotaxime and ceftazidime are compared to each other in Table 2. The overall prevalence of resistance of S. flexneri to ceftriaxone was 0·6% (95% CI 0·3–1·1) whereas that of S. sonnei was only 0·2% (95% CI 0·1–0·4) in Europe-America. However, Asia-Africa showed a different pattern of resistance in that S. sonnei appeared to be more resistant to ceftriaxone than S. flexneri, with the respective prevalence of resistance being 3·5% (95% CI 2·3–5·0) vs. 3·0% (95% CI 2·0–4·2). With regard to cefotaxime and ceftazidime, S. flexneri showed a higher prevalence of resistance than S. sonnei in Europe-America and Asia-Africa regardless of regional differences. The overall prevalence of resistance of S. flexneri and S. sonnei to cefotaxime and ceftazidimewere 0·6% (95% CI 0·1–3·2) vs. 0·2% (95% CI 0·1–1·6) and 0·7% (95% CI 0·0–2·7) vs. 0·5% (95% CI 0·0–2·3) (Table 2), respectively, in Europe-America, and 6·3% (95% CI 3·7–9·7) vs. 2·8% (95% CI 1·3–4·8) and 7·0% (95% CI 1·9–14·8) vs. 4·4% (95% CI 1·9–9·0) (Table 2), respectively, in Asia-Africa. Irrespective of S. flexneri or S. sonnei, the prevalence of resistances to these three study drugs was greater in Asia-Africa than in Europe-America, especially from 2007 to 2012. Data concerning these three TGCs in Europe-America during 2010–2012 were not found.

Table 2. Rates of resistance to ceftriaxone, cefotaxime and cefazidime in Shigella flexneri and S. sonnei isolated from Europe-America and Asia-Africa during 1998–2012

R, Resistance; CI, confidence interval; NR, no result.

Weight % refers to how much each row contributes to the ‘Overall’ row.

Comparison of the resistance of TGCs between different countries

Comparative analyses of the resistance of Shigella isolates against TGCs in different countries are illustrated in descending order in Table 3. First, we can see that the highest average prevalence of resistance to ceftriaxone was in Vietnam, reaching 16·9 (95% CI 13·4–20·7), followed by China, India and Palestine, representing 11·2% (95% CI 10·0–12·4), 9·5% (95% CI 8·1–11·1) and 9·2% (95% CI 2·2–20·2), respectively. Similarly, the first four countries with a high prevalence of resistance to cefotaxime were Nigeria (43·6%, 95% CI 31·7–55·9), China (12·0%, 95% CI 10·5–13·4), Ghana (11·6%, 95% CI 2·8–25·3) and Palestine (5·0%, 95% CI 0·2–15·7). With regard to ceftazidime, Sudan, Iran, Palestine and India had a higher prevalence of resistance, each representing 52·1% (95% CI 37·9–66·1), 10·0 (95% CI 8·4–11·8), 7·9% (95% CI 1·6–18·5% and 6·6% (95% CI 3·4–10·7), respectively. Comparing these three TGCs, ceftazidime had the highest overall prevalence of resistance of 3·8% (95% CI 0·7–4·4) whereas ceftriaxone showed the lowest resistance of 0·9% (95% CI 0·8–1·0). However, one marked similarity was that all the countries that showed a relatively high prevalence of resistance were developing countries in Asia such as Vietnam and China. The extraordinarily high prevalence of resistance for cefotaxime in Nigeria and for ceftazidime in Sudan may have a potential association with the small sample of the data. Second, these figures also provided a tendency of resistance over time. That is, the fastest-rising countries for resistance to ceftriaxone, cefotaxime and ceftazidime were Pakistan, India and Iran from 2007 to 2012, representing a 6·1-, 14·0- and 2·1-fold increase over the last 15 years.

Table 3. Resistance to ceftriaxone, cefotaxime and cefazidime in Shigella spp. in different countries during 1998–2012

R, Resistance; CI, confidence interval; NR, no result.

Weight % refers to how much each row contributes to the ‘Overall’ row.

DISCUSSION

For years, shigellosis has been endemic in many resource-poor countries. This has been primarily because of over-crowding, poor housing, poor sanitation and inadequate water supply facilitating faecal–oral transmission. Any of the four subtypes of Shigella (S. dysenteriae, S. flexneri, S. boydii, S. sonnei) can cause shigellosis with symptoms ranging from watery diarrhoea to fulminant dysentery [Reference Goel20, Reference Tiruneh24Reference Djie-Maletz26]. Shifts in the prevalent serogroups and changing resistance patterns in antimicrobial susceptibilities in Shigella are posing major difficulties in determination of an appropriate drug for the treatment of shigellosis [Reference Bryce7, Reference Bonkoungou27]. Moreover, antimicrobial resistance in Shigella varies from region to region. Thus, when choosing an appropriate antibiotic to treat shigellosis, an understanding of the local antimicrobial resistance is important. Knowledge regarding the occurrence of different serotypes in different countries and geographical regions may assist in the recognition and tracing of emerging pathogens and in the implementation of correct treatment and control strategies.

Various factors can contribute to the emergence and dissemination of multidrug-resistant (MDR) strains of Shigella. The most decisive factor is selection of MDR strains harbouring certain resistance mechanisms because of overuse or misuse of drugs in certain geographical areas. TGCs are used for treating infections caused by MDR Shigella [Reference Rahman19, Reference Varsano28]. As part of the β-lactam family of drugs, TGCs have advantages over the other agents: i.e. a wider spectrum of activity, stronger germicidal activity, fewer allergic reactions, and stablility against β-lactamase. The activity of β-lactams is in combination with penicillin-binding proteins and inhibition of cytoderm synthesis, thereby restraining the proliferation of bacteria. Reports regarding resistance by Shigella to TGCs have been published, but they are relatively uncommon [Reference Goel20, Reference Seidlein and Ali29, Reference Srinivasa, Baijayanti and Raksha30]. However, resistance to TGCs due to extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs), which confer resistance to all β-lactamases except cephamycins and carbapenems, has emerged as a new problem. ESBLs, are enzymes usually derived from the widespread broad-spectrum β-lactamase TEM-1 and SHV-1, able to hydrolyse and cause resistance to oxyimino-cephalosporins and aztrenman, There are also new families of ESBLs, including the CTX-M and OXA-type enzymes as well as novel, unrelated β-lactamases [Reference Bradford31].

Comparing the prevalence resistance to these three study drugs, the first conclusion we can make is that, to all appearances, in Europe-America, there were few large changes in the prevalence of resistance of the three study drugs during the study years, maintaining a level of <0·1%. However Asia-Africa had a much greater prevalence of resistance with an increasing upward trend year by year. Although no upward trend was showing in Europe-America, some studies have reported that certain MDR strains of Shigella have been transmitted by travellers in Europe-America [Reference Lee32Reference Takeshita35]. Furthermore, resistance rates to ceftriaxone, cefotaxime and ceftazidime were up to 14·2% (95% CI 3·9–29·4), 22·6% (95% CI 4·8–48·6) and 6·2% (95% CI 3·8–9·1), respectively (Table 1) during 2010–2012 in Asia-Africa which should attract immediate attention. Several explanations could account for this phenomenon. First, regional differences which directly determine the socioeconomic status are the root cause. People living in relatively developed areas (Europe-America) tend to obtain better treatment after infection than people in less developed countries (Asia-Africa). Second, deficiencies in medical systems and facilities also play an important part. Asian-African countries such as Pakistan lack the infrastructure to monitor antimicrobial resistance at the national level [Reference Mache and Cowly36, Reference Zhang37]. In addition, inexpensive antibiotics are available from numerous licensed and non-licensed sources in many Asian-African countries, making drug abuse a common problem, leading to a high prevalence of resistance [Reference Yang5, Reference Bonkoungou27]. Third, poor hygiene and sanitation with limited access to safe drinking water contributes to the spread of MDR strains of Shigella. Underlying conditions, such as malnutrition, which increase the risk of contracting diarrhoea, are also common in Asian-African countries [Reference Bonkoungou27].

Upon comparison of the prevalence of resistance between S. flexneri and S. sonnei, the former showed a notable increase in resistance to these three antibiotics in Asia-Africa. Values for resistance in 2010–2012 reached 32·1% (95% CI 1·1–79·5) and 34·0% (95% CI 25·5–43·1) (Table 2) for ceftriaxone and cefotaxime, respectively, suggesting that prescription of these antibiotics should be considered very carefully. With regard to S. sonnei, the increase was also very fast although lower than that for S. flexneri, each representing <20% in 2010–2012. Similar trends were found in the prevalence of resistance of S. flexneri and S. sonnei in Europe-America to the study drugs although the total average resistance remained at a low level (<1·0). Information about the prevalence of resistance by Shigella to cefotaxime was only seen in 2004–2006 in Europe-America, which stresses the need for continuous surveillance of resistance in those countries. When explaining the appreciable difference between the prevalence of resistance of S. flexneri and S. sonnei, several studies have demonstrated that integrons have a key role in the development of drug resistance in bacteria, especially Gram-negative bacteria [Reference Mariani-Kurkdjian, Doit and Bingen38Reference Perez-Moreno40]. In Shigella species, antimicrobial resistance is often associated with class 1 and class 2 integrons that contain resistance gene cassettes. These gene cassettes are mobile and can be transferred from one bacterium to another. Antibiotic resistance gene cassettes may provide a flexible approach for bacteria to adapt to the environmental pressure caused by antibiotics. This mechanism of action may account for the dissemination of resistant genes and the emergence of MDR strains. The distribution of integrons varies according to the species and resistance phenotype. S. sonnei and S. boydii strains contain a single class 2 integron, whereas S. flexneri and S. dysenteriae strains carry a class 1 integron, either alone or in association with a class 2 integron [Reference Ke41]. Harbouring two types of integrons therefore increases the probability of dissemination of MDR strains of Shigella.

Another noteworthy finding in these meta-analyses was that certain countries both in Europe-America and Asia-Africa, had a rapid rising trend in the prevalence of resistance of S. sonnei which, even outnumbered that of S. flexneri in some periods. For instance, the total prevalence of resistance of S. sonnei to ceftriaxone was higher than that for S. flexneri in Asia-Africa (Table 2). The years 2007–2009 also witnessed a greater prevalence of resistance to ceftazidime in S. sonnei than S. flexneri in Europe-America and Asia-Africa. For example, the results for S. sonnei against ceftazidime were three times higher than that for S. flexneri in Europe-America (Table 2). Historically, S. sonnei has been predominantly responsible for dysentery in developed countries, but is now emerging as a problem in the developing world, apparently substituting for the more diverse S. flexneri in areas undergoing economic development and improvements in water quality [Reference Chompook4, Reference Kotloff8, Reference Sack, Huq and Etheridge42]. When pursuing the root cause of this phenomenon, it is easy to associate the differences between the mechanisms of infection of S. sonnei and S. flexneri. S. sonnei are often reported to be associated with schools, care facilities, contaminated food and insects acting as transmission vehicles between faecal waste and food preparation areas whereas S. flexneri is associated with waterborne transmission [Reference Genobile43Reference Cohen45]. More direct and diverse mechanisms of transmission could explain the persistence of S. sonnei even if the infrastructure of water supply is improved [Reference Holt46]. Our results showed that, in the near future, S. sonnei may take the place of S. flexneri as the main strain resistant to TGCs. All these data emphasize the fact that monitoring of emerging resistance in Shigella isolates is essential for timely and appropriate recommendations of antimicrobial therapy. Fortunately, all S. sonnei strains share a single O antigen that has proven to be a successful vaccine target; a suitable vaccine is an achievable solution for prevention and medication [Reference Yang47, Reference Kaminski and Oaks48].

When taking a small sample of data into consideration, the prevalence of resistance rates in different countries suggests that the severest problem regarding resistance to these three TGCs appeared in Vietnam (especially for ceftriaxone), China (especially for cefotaxime) and Iran (especially for ceftazidime). It is not unexpected to see that these three countries are developing Asian countries. Apart from some generalities in most developing countries in Asia such as socioeconomic status and medical systems, individualized factors are also important. For instance, in Vietnam, the average prevalence of resistance for ceftriaxone during the study years was 16·9% (95% CI 13·4–20·7) and the resistance in 2007–2012 increased to 22·2% (95% CI 17·5–27·4) (Table 3), 5·8 times greater than that reported in 1998–2000. Between May 2007 and January 2008, 11 cases of childhood shigellosis caused by ceftriaxone-resistant organisms isolated in South Vietnam were reported for the first time [Reference Vinh21]. In Vietnam, nalidixic acid is no longer used therapeutically, and fluoroquinolones are recommended for the treatment of Shigella infections. However, if a patient does not respond to fluoroquinolone treatment, ceftriaxone is used as an alternative [Reference Kotloff8, Reference Vinh21]. Thus increases in resistance to older antimicrobial therapies which eventually lead to uncontrolled use of ceftriaxone in this setting may speed the spread of MDR organisms. Moreover, due to the miscellaneous nature of Shigella it is likely that resistant genes are transferred regularly to and from other enteric bacteria and could be advantageous in an evolutionary sense. One study suggests that the pattern of infection could be related to the rainy season in Vietnam. That study showed that increased ground water could account for this pattern because a longer distance to a water source was found to be associated with a higher risk of shigellosis [Reference Kotloff8]. With regard to China, the overall prevalence of resistance showed a progressively upward trend, especially for cefotaxime [average prevalence of resistance, 11·2% (95% CI 10·0–12·4)] (Table 3). These data highlight the socioeconomic development of China but in turn complicate the selection of empirical antibiotics for the treatment of shigellosis. As a result, to control the spread of resistance in Shigella, continuous monitoring of resistance patterns at national and international levels is the top priority.

Based on our meta-analyses, two main recommendations can be given for empirical antibiotic therapy. First, the current situation in Europe-America supports the use of ceftriaxone and cefotaxime for treating shigellosis according to the relatively lower prevalence of resistance to the study drugs (although a mild upward trend should be noticed). To some extent, data suggest that ceftriaxone and cefotaxime may not be appropriate for treating shigellosis in Asia-Africa. By comparison, ceftazidime, while showing good in vitro activity against Shigella, is better known for treating Pseudomonas infections. We encourage general practitioners to avoid empirical treatment and conduct susceptibility testing in order to select the most appropriate antimicrobial for treatment.

Second, the two main subtypes, S. flexneri and S. sonnei remain the major strains isolated from patients with shigellosis, showing a gradual increase in resistance, particularly in Asia-Africa. Broadly speaking, attention should be given to not only S. flexneri (which has been predominant in the past) but also to S. sonnei (which could be a major resistant bacterial strain in the near future). Drug-sensitive tests are needed before prescribing because of strain variations. Vaccines might be a good choice for treatment [Reference Martinez-Becerra49Reference Osorio, Bray and Walker52].

However, all the data collected are reliant on published reports of Shigella species. This is based on the assumption that what is occurring in the community is reflected by what is published. The rate at which resistance is reported may not be directly related to the prevalence of resistance to Shigella infection. Although a considerable Shigella burden was detected, the actual burden caused by shigellosis may be underestimated for two reasons. First, when passive surveillance is used for case detection, reported rates depend on the healthcare-seeking behaviour of individual patients, some of whom may purchase drugs from pharmacies (known as over the counter; OTC) without medical consultation, have a mild form of the disease that does not prompt them to seek care, or fail to provide a faecal sample. Both appropriate and inappropriate use of antibiotics is a key driver of antibiotic resistance development. However, overuse or misuse of antibiotics provides an avoidable additional pressure leading to more antibiotic resistance. OTC sales of antibiotics without a prescription remains a major problem around the world. OTC availability increased the total quantity of TGCs supplied in primary care. As an alternative, active surveillance would have provided a more complete detection of all diarrhoeal episodes, at the risk of capturing trivial episodes that do not require medical care [Reference Nga do53].

Second, Shigella species are highly fastidious organisms that die rapidly in an unsuitable environment, including the unavoidable temperature fluctuations encountered during transport. Therefore, a significant number of cases may have been missed and the actual Shigella infection rate may be much higher than we reported. Meanwhile, it is very interesting that collection bias may cause overestimation of drug resistance of Shigella isolates, because individuals infected with resistant strains who failed empirical treatment are more likely to be investigated with stool culture for continued diarrhoea than individuals infected with susceptible strains who respond to empirical therapy [Reference Gu16].

In summary, our meta-analyses enabled us to summarize information concerning the prevalence of resistance to TGCs in Shigella between Europe-America and Asia-Africa and comparisons between different subtypes and different countries are also provided. Admittedly, missing data during certain years could be a deficiency in this research, which may have some influences on the final results. Naturally, this study just gives the full picture of the situation in the various destination countries. Physicians in these regions should be aware of this point and perform susceptibility testing on all clinical isolates, changing the empirical antibiotic accordingly. The serious problem of shigellosis and antimicrobial resistance may become worse if no effective measure is taken to deal with it. Government and non-governmental organizations have a significant role to play in changing the emergent situation. To slow down the development of TGC resistance, an important control strategy is to reduce the inappropriate use of antibiotics in both community and hospital settings. Although changing these practices is challenging, we have some suggestions. Suggested areas of improvement are enforcement of regulations and pricing policies, and educational programmes to increase the knowledge of drug sellers as well as to increase community awareness to reduce demand pressure for drug sellers to dispense antibiotics inappropriately. The irrational overuse of antibiotics should be minimized as it drives the development of antibiotic resistance, but a better understanding is needed of practices and economic incentives for antibiotic dispensing in order to design effective interventions to reduce inappropriate use of TGCs [Reference Wirtz54, Reference Du, John and Walker55].

SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL

For supplementary material accompanying this paper visit http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0950268814003446.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The authors thank all participants for their assistance with data collection and valuable discussion. This research was funded by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81000754), a grant from the Key Laboratory for Laboratory Medicine of Jiangsu Province of China (No. XK201114) and a project funded by the Priority Academic Programme Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions.

DECLARATION OF INTEREST

None.

Footnotes

These authors contributed equally to this work.

References

REFERENCES

1. Niyogi, SK, Mitra, U, Dutta, P. Changing patterns of serotypes and antimicrobial susceptibilities of Shigella species isolated from children in Calcutta, India. Japanese Journal of Infectious Disease 2001; 54: 121122.Google Scholar
2. Vinh, H, et al. A changing picture of shigellosis in southern Vietnam: shifting species dominance, antimicrobial susceptibility and clinical presentation. BMC Infectious Disease 2009; 9: 204.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3. Jamsheer, AE, et al. Trend of antibiotic resistance in 1316 Shigella strains isolated in Bahrain. Saudi Medical Journal 2003; 24: 424426.Google ScholarPubMed
4. Chompook, P, et al. Estimating the burden of shigellosis in Thailand: 36-month population-based surveillance study. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 2005; 83: 739746.Google Scholar
5. Yang, HCG, et al. Surveillance of antimicrobial susceptibility patterns among Shigella species isolated in China during the 7-year period of 2005–2011. Annals of Laboratory Medicine 2013; 33: 111115.Google Scholar
6. Kosek, M, Bern, C, Guerrant, RL. The global burden of diarrhoeal disease, as estimated from studies published between 1992 and 2000. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 2003; 81: 197204.Google ScholarPubMed
7. Bryce, J, et al. WHO estimates of the causes of death in children. Lancet 2005; 365: 11471152.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8. Kotloff, KL, et al. Global burden of Shigella infections: implications for vaccine development and implementation of control strategies. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 1999; 77: 651666.Google Scholar
9. WHO. Guidelines for the control of shigellosis, including epidemics due to Shigella dysenteriae type. Geneva: World Health Organization.Google Scholar
10. Sur, D, et al. Shigellosis: challenges and management issues. Indian Journal of Medical Research 2004; 120: 454462.Google Scholar
11. Bhattacharya, SK, Sur, D. An evaluation of current shigellosis treatment. Expert Opinion in Pharmacotherapy 2003; 4: 13151320.Google Scholar
12. Watanabe, T. Infective heredity of multiple drug resistance in bacteria. Bacteriological Reviews 1963; 27: 87115.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13. Sack, RB, et al. Antimicrobial resistance in organisms causing diarrheal disease. Clinical Infectious Disease 1997; 24 (Suppl. 1): S102S105.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14. Bhattacharya, K, et al. Double-blind, randomized clinical trial for safety and efficacy of norfloxacin for shigellosis in children. Acta Paediatrica 1997; 86: 319320.Google Scholar
15. Green, S TG, Tilloston, G. Use of Ciprofloxacinrofloxacin in developing countries. Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal 1997; 16: 150159.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16. Gu, B, et al. Comparison of the prevalence and changing resistance to nalidixic acid and ciprofloxacin of Shigella between Europe-America and Asia-Africa from 1998 to 2009. International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents 2012; 40: 917.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17. Gu, B, et al. Prevalence and trends monitoring of aminoglycoside resistance in Shigella worldwide, 1999–2010. Journal of Biomedical Research 2013; 27: 103115.Google Scholar
18. Fortineau, N, et al. SHV-type extended spectrum-lactamase in a Shigella flexneri clinical isolate. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 2001; 47: 685688.Google Scholar
19. Rahman, M, et al. Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-mediated third-generation cephalosporin resistance in Shigella isolates in Bangladesh. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 2004; 54: 846847.Google Scholar
20. Goel, N, et al. Emergence of ceftriaxone resistant Shigella . Indian Journal of Pediatrics 2013; 80: 7071.Google Scholar
21. Vinh, H, et al. Rapid emergence of third-generation cephalosporin resistant Shigella spp. in Southern Vietnam. Journal of Medical Microbiology 2009; 58: 281283.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22. Taneja, N, et al. Cephalosporin-resistant Shigella flexneri over 9 years (2001–09) in India. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 2012; 67: 13471353.Google Scholar
23. Freeman, MF TJ. Transformations related to the angular and square root. Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics 1950; 21: 607611.Google Scholar
24. Tiruneh, M. Serodiversity and antimicrobial resistance pattern of Shigella isolates at Gondar University teaching hospital, Northwest Ethiopia. Japanese Journal of Infectious Disease 2009; 62: 9397.Google Scholar
25. Opintan, J, Newman, MJ. Distribution of serogroups and serotypes of multiple drug resistant Shigella isolates. Ghana Medical Journal 2007; 41: 829.Google Scholar
26. Djie-Maletz, A RK, et al. High rate of resistance to locally used antibiotics among enteric bacteria from children in Northern Ghana. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 2008; 61: 13151318.Google Scholar
27. Bonkoungou, IJ, et al. Bacterial and viral etiology of childhood diarrhea in Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso. BMC Pediatrics 2013; 13: 36.Google Scholar
28. Varsano, I, et al. Comparative efficacy of ceftriaxone and ampicillin for treatment of severe shigellosis in children. Journal of Pediatrics 1991;118:627632 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
29. Seidlein, LV KD, Ali, M. A multicentre study of shigella diarrhea in six Asian countries: disease burden, clinical manifestations, and microbiology. PLoS Medicine 2006; 3: e353.Google Scholar
30. Srinivasa, H, Baijayanti, M, Raksha, Y. Magnitude of drug resistant Shigellosis: a report from Bangalore. Indian Journal of Medical Microbiology 2009; 27: 358360.Google Scholar
31. Bradford, PA. Extended-spectrumb-lactamases in the 21st century: characterisation, epidemiology and detection of this important resistant threat. Clinical Microbiology Reviews 2001; 14: 933951.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
32. Lee, W, et al. CTX-M-55-type extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Shigella sonnei isolated from a Korean patient who had travelled to China. Annals of Laboratory Medicine 2013; 33: 141144.Google Scholar
33. Marchou, B. Traveler's diarrheoa: epidemiology, clinical practice guideline for the prevention and treatment. Presse Medicale 2013; 42: 7681.Google Scholar
34. Jeon, YL, et al. Quinolone-resistant Shigella flexneri isolated in a patient who travelled to India. Annals of Laboratory Medicine 2012; 32:366369.Google Scholar
35. Takeshita, N. Travellers and multi-drug resistance bacteria. Nihon Rinsho 2012; 70: 324328.Google Scholar
36. Mache, AMY, Cowly, S. Shigella serogroups identified from adult diarrhoea out-patients in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: antibiotic resistance and plasmid profile analysis. East African Medical Journal 1997; 74: 179182.Google Scholar
37. Zhang, CL, et al. Drug resistance and molecular epidemiology of Shigella isolated from children with diarrhea. Zhonghua Er Ke Za Zhi 2012; 50: 777781.Google ScholarPubMed
38. Mariani-Kurkdjian, P, Doit, C, Bingen, E. Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase producing-enterobacteria. Arch Pediatrics 2012; 19 (Suppl. 3): S9396.Google Scholar
39. Partridge, SR, et al. Gene cassettes and cassette arrays in mobile resistance integrons. FEMS Microbiology Reviews 2009; 33: 757784.Google Scholar
40. Perez-Moreno, MO, et al. Beta-Lammases, transferable quinolone resistance determinants, and class 1 integron-mediated antimicrobial resistance in human clinical Salmonella enteric isolates of non-Typhimurium serotypes. International Journal of Medical Microbiology 2013; 303: 2531.Google Scholar
41. Ke, X, et al. Epidemiology and molecular mechanism of integron-mediated antibiotic resistance in Shigella . Archives of Microbiology 2011; 193: 767774.Google Scholar
42. Sack, DA HA, Huq, A, Etheridge, M. Is protection against shigellosis induced by natural infection with Pleonasms shigellosis? Lancet 1994; 343: 14131415.Google Scholar
43. Genobile, D, et al. An outbreak of shigellosis in a child care center. Communicable Disease Intelligence Quarterly Report 2004; 28: 225229.Google Scholar
44. Lewis, HC, et al. Outbreaks of Shigella sonnei infections in Denmark and Australia linked to consumption of imported raw baby corn. Epidemiology and Infection 2009; 137: 326334.Google Scholar
45. Cohen, D, et al. Reduction of transmission of shigellosis by control of houseflies (Musca domestica). Lancet 1991; 337: 993997.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
46. Holt, KE, et al. Shigella sonnei genome sequencing and phylogenetic analysis indicate recent global dissemination from Europe. Nature Genetics 2012; 44: 10561059.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
47. Yang, H, et al. Serotype distribution and characteristics of antimicrobial resistance in Shigella isolated from Henan province, China, 2001–2008. Epidemiology and Infection 2013; 141: 19461952.Google Scholar
48. Kaminski, RW, Oaks, EV. Inactivated and subunit vaccines to prevent shigellosis. Expert Review of Vaccines 2009; 8: 16931704.Google Scholar
49. Martinez-Becerra, FJ, et al. Broadly protective Shigella vaccine based on type III secretion apparatus proteins. Infection and Immunity 2012; 80: 12221231.Google Scholar
50. Steele, D, et al. Vaccines for enteric diseases: a meeting summary. Expert Review of Vaccines 2012; 11: 407409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
51. Levine, MM, et al. Clinical trials of Shigella vaccines: two steps forward and one step back on a long, hard road. Nature Reviews Microbiology 2007; 5: 540553.Google Scholar
52. Osorio, M, Bray, MD, Walker, RI. Vaccine potential for inactivated shigellae . Vaccine 2007; 25: 15811592.Google Scholar
53. Nga do, TT, et al. Antibiotic sales in rural and urban pharmacies in northern Vietnam: an observational study. BMC Pharmacology and Toxicology 2014; 15: 6.Google Scholar
54. Wirtz, VJ, et al. Analysing policy interventions to prohibit over-the-counter antibiotic sales in four Latin American countries. Tropical Medicine and International Health 2013; 18: 665673.Google Scholar
55. Du, HC, John, DN, Walker, R. An investigation of prescription and over-the-counter supply of opthalmic chloramphenicol in Wales in the 5 years following reclassification. International Journal of Pharmacy Practice 2014; 22: 2027.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Results of the systematic literature search.

Figure 1

Table 1. Resistance to ceftriaxone, cefotaxime and ceftazidime in Shigella spp. collected during 1998–2012

Figure 2

Table 2. Rates of resistance to ceftriaxone, cefotaxime and cefazidime in Shigella flexneri and S. sonnei isolated from Europe-America and Asia-Africa during 1998–2012

Figure 3

Table 3. Resistance to ceftriaxone, cefotaxime and cefazidime in Shigella spp. in different countries during 1998–2012

Supplementary material: File

Gu Supplementary Material

Supplementary Material

Download Gu Supplementary Material(File)
File 200.2 KB