Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T04:35:32.688Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Epidemic Curve of Smallpox

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

W. J. Martin
W. J. Martin
Affiliation:
From the Division of Epidemiology and Vital Statistics, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

When a disease assumes epidemic proportions, it is now generally recognised that certain conditions govern the rise and fall of the epidemic wave. Farr was probably the first person to attempt to describe these conditions in quantitative terms. His theory was “ the real law (i.e. of the epidemic) implies that the ratio of increase goes on rapidly decreasing until the ratio itself is decreasing.” In the Appendix to the second Annual Report of the Registrar-General he discusses the progress of the smallpox epidemic which had spread through England and Wales in 1837–9, causing the deaths of over 30,000 persons. “Five die weekly of smallpox in the metropolis when the disease is not epidemic… Why do the five deaths become 10, 15, 20, 31, 58, 88 weekly and then progressively fall through the same measured steps?” He suggests, “amidst the apparent irregularities of the epidemic of smallpox and its eruptions all over the kingdom, it was governed in its progress by certain general laws.” He found that the deaths from smallpox in the quarters of the year during the epidemic increased up to the third quarter very nearly at the ratio of 30 per cent. “The rate of increase is retarded at the end of the third period, and only rises 6 per cent. in the next, where it remains stationary, like a projectile at the summit of the curve which it is destined to describe. The decline of the epidemic was less rapid than its rise.” He showed that the fall of mortality took place at a uniformly accelerated rate and calculated a “regular series of numbers” (such that the second differences of the logarithms are constant) for the decline of the epidemic.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 34 , Issue 1 , February 1934 , pp. 10 - 29
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1934

References

REFERENCES

Brownlee, J. (1915, 1916). On the curve of the epidemic. Brit. Med. J. 8. v. 15–29. vii. 16.Google Scholar
Brownlee, J. (1915). Historical note on Farr's theory of epidemics. Brit. Med. J. 14. viii. 15.Google Scholar
Evans, G. H. (1866–76). Some arithmetical considerations of the progress of epidemics. Trans. Epidem. Soc. of London, 3, 551.Google Scholar
Farr, W. (1840). Second Annual Report, Registrar-General. Dr Farr's Appendix, p. 91.Google Scholar
Greenwood, M. (1913). The factors that determine the rise and spread and degree of severity of epidemic diseases. The nth International Congress of Medicine (Hygiene and Preventive Medicine), Section xviii, London, pp. 49–80.Google Scholar
Greenwood, M. (1930). The vaccination problem. J. Roy. Stat. Soc. 93, Part II, pp. 233–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guy, W. A. (1882). On two hundred and fifty years of smallpox in London. J. Roy. Stat. Soc. 45, pp. 399–137.Google Scholar