Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T04:20:25.382Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Further Experience of the Bismuth Sulphite Media in the Isolation of Bacillus typhosus and B. paratyphosus B from Faeces, Sewage and Water

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

W. James Wilson  and
E. M. McV. Blair
W. James Wilson
Affiliation:
(From the Public Health Laboratories, Queen's University, Belfast.)
E. M. McV. Blair
Affiliation:
(From the Public Health Laboratories, Queen's University, Belfast.)
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. By means of the Old Standard bismuth sulphite medium B. typhosus was cultivated 44 times out of 50 examinations of the stools of 50 typhoid fever patients and convalescents.

2. By means of the same medium B. paratyphosus B was cultivated 22 times out of 27 examinations of the stools of 27 different cases of paratyphoid fever.

3. In 13 examinations of Belfast sewage in different months during 1928 and 1929, by means of the Old Standard sulphite media, B. typhosus was isolated on 10 occasions. In two examinations of Lisburn sewage B. typhosus was isolated. Although no special search for B. paratyphosus B was undertaken, this organism was isolated on two occasions from Belfast sewage. The viability of B. typhosus and B. paratyphosus B in sewage is longer than was suggested by the work of previous observers. It has been possible to cultivate B. typhosus and B. paratyphosus B from the deposit of sewage stored in a bottle at room temperature for 3 weeks. On one occasion B. typhosus was found alive at the end of 5 weeks.

4. On two occasions water from the River Lagan was examined, and on one of these B. typhosus and B. paratyphosus B were cultivated.

5. For the isolation of the B. enteritidis Gaertner the media gave good results in the examination of faeces from cases of food-poisoning.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 31 , Issue 2 , April 1931 , pp. 138 - 161
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1931

References

REFERENCES

Adams, B. (1928). The Medical Officer, 39, 185.Google Scholar
Allison, V. D. (1927–1928). Rep. of Lab. of Metropolitan Asylums‘ Board. London.Google Scholar
Begbie, R. S. and Gibson, H. J. (1930). Brit. Med. J. 2, 55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bitter, Weigmann and Habs, (1926). Münch. med. Wochenschr. p. 940.Google Scholar
Buonomini, G. (1929). Giorn. di Batter. e Immun. 4. Reprint.Google Scholar
D'Antona, L. (1929). Giorn. di Batter. e Immun. p. 323. Reprint.Google Scholar
Dodgson, R. W. (1928). Report on Mussel Purification. Min. Agric. and Fish., Fishery Investig. Series II, 10, 193.Google Scholar
Franco, E. (1929). Giorn. di Batter. e Immun. 4. Reprint.Google Scholar
Gray, J. D. A. (1929). Brit. Med. J. 1, 142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hashimoto, K. (1927). Centralbl. f. Bakt.Orig. 103, 1.Google Scholar
Houston, A. C. (1928). Metropolitan Water Board, Twenty-third Annual Report.Google Scholar
Houston, A. C. (1929). Metropolitan Water Board, Twenty-fourth Annual Report.Google Scholar
Jordan, E. O. and Harmon, P. H. (1928). J. Infect. Dis. 42, 238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mazzetti, G. (1928). R. Accad. dei Fisiocritici di Siena. Communicaz. del 25. v. 28. Reprint.Google Scholar
Nissle, (1916). Deutsche med. Wochenschr. 42.Google Scholar
Russell, H. L. and Fuller, C. A. (1906). J. Infect. Dis. Supplement No. 2, p. 40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, R. P. (1923). J. Path. and Bact. 26, 122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vignati, J. (1928). Centralbl. f. Bakt.Orig. 107, 54.Google Scholar
Wilson, W. J. and Blair, E. M. McV. (1927). J. Hygiene, 26, 374.Google Scholar
Wilson, W. J. (23. vi. 1928). Brit. Med. J. 1, 1061.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, W. J. (1928). Public Health Congress. London, 11 1928.Google Scholar