Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T12:24:56.819Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Can deinstitutionalised care be provided for those at risk of violent offending?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 October 2011

Claire Henderson
Affiliation:
Institute of Psychiatry, London, UK
Jonathan Bindman
Affiliation:
Institute of Psychiatry, London, UK
Graham Thornicroft
Affiliation:
Institute of Psychiatry, London, UK

Summary

Objective - The aim of this article is to explain the current status of deinstitutionalisation and of community care development in the UK. Design — Literature review of articles and reports on deinstitutionalisation. Setting — Articles included in the review related either to the whole of the UK, to England and Wales, or to a specific area such as London. Main outcome measures — The review was carried out pertaining to the question of the extent to which community care can or should take over the functions of the asylum, with particular reference to those at risk of behaving violently. These functions include those that are manifest, or explicit, and those that are latent, or unintended but implicit (Bachrach, 1976). Results — The example of patients at risk of violent behaviour is one that highlights the continuing relevance of both these sets of functions, which are argued to be exerting a powerful influence on the processes of asylum closure and community care development. This influence is seen in delayed asylum closure, transinstitutionalisation (the shift of some patients from asylums to other institutions), and the institutionalisation of aspects of community care. Conclusions — Both the manifest and the latent functions of asylums must be acknowledged by those involved in planning community care; where it is felt desirable that community care does not take over certain functions, the consequences of this must be anticipated so that they can be prevented or dealt with in other ways.

Riassunto

Scopo — Lo scopo di questo lavoro e spiegare l'attuale situazione della deistituzionalizzazione e dello sviluppo della community care in Gran Bretagna. Disegno — Rassegna di articoli e rapporti sulla distituzionalizzazione. Setting — Articoli inclusi in rassegne che si riferiscono o all'intera Gran Bretagna, all'Inghilterra e al Galles o alia specifica area di Londra. Principali misure utilizzate — La rassegna e stata realizzata avendo come obiettivo il problema della misura in cui la community care pud o dovrebbe assumere le funzioni dell'ospedale psichiatrico, con particolare riferimento ai pazienti a rischio di comportamento violento. Queste funzioni comprendono sia quelle manifeste o esplicite, sia quelle latenti, o non esplicitate, ma implicite (Bachrach, 1976). Risultati — L'esempio di pazienti a rischio di comportamento violento mette in luce la continua rilevanza di entrambi questi gruppi di funzioni, che si suppone esercitino una forte influenza sui processi di chiusura degli ospedali psichiatrici e sullo sviluppo della community care. Questa influenza si manifesta nella ritardata chiusura degli ospedali psichiatrici, nella trans-istituzionalizzazione (il passaggio di alcuni pazienti dagli ospedali ad altre istituzioni) e l'istituzionalizzazione di aspetti della community care. Conclusioni — Sia le funzioni manifeste che quelle latenti degli ospedali psichiatrici devono essere riconosciute da coloro che sono coinvolti nella pianificazione della community care; qualora si ritenga desiderabile che la community care non assuma certe funzioni, e necessario prevederne le conseguenze, cosicche esse siano gestite in altro modo.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bachrach, L. (1976). Deinstitutionalisation: an Analytical Review and Sociological Perspective. US Department of Health, Education and Welfare, NIMH: Rockville, Maryland.Google Scholar
Barham, P. (1992). Closing the Asylum: The Mental Patient in Modern Society. Penguin: Harmondsworth.Google Scholar
Bindman, J., Davies, S., Taylor, R. & Thornicroft, G. (1996). Developments in mental health policy in the United Kingdom. Epidemiologia e Psichiatria Sociale 5, 8791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bindman, J., Beck, A. & Thornicroft, G. (1997). GPs need training in Care Programme Approach more than in supervised discharge (letter). British Medical Journal 315, 6162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burns, T. (1997). Case management, care management and care programming (editorial). British Journal of Psychiatry 170, 393395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caldicott, F. (1994). Supervision Registers: the College's response.Psychiatric Bulletin 18, 385386.Google Scholar
Craig, T. (1994). In Mental Health Services: Minutes of Evidence. Health Committee 10/2/94. HMSO: London.Google Scholar
Davidge, M. et al. (1994). Survey of English Mental Illness Hospitals March 1994: Monitoring the Closure of the Water Tower. Prepared for the Mental Health Task Force, University of Birmingham: Birmingham.Google Scholar
Dayson, D. (1993). The TAPS Project. 12: Crime, vagrancy, death and readmission of the long-term mentally ill during their first year of local reprovision. British Journal of Psychiatry 162, Suppl. 19, 4044.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eastman N (1995). Anti-therapeutic community mental health law. British Medical Journal 310, 10811083.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glover, G. (1995). Mental health informatics and the rhythm of community care. British Medical Journal 311, 10381039.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goldberg, D. (1994). In Mental Health Services: Minutes of Evidence. Health Committee 24/2/94. HMSO: London.Google Scholar
Goldberg, D.(1997). Executive summary: London's mental health. In London's Mental Health (ed. Johnson, S. et al. ). King's Fund: London.Google ScholarPubMed
Gorton, S. (1994). In Mental Health Services: Minutes of Evidence. Health Committee 10/2/94.HMSO: London.Google Scholar
Gunn, J. & Taylor, P. (1993). Forensic Psychiatry: Clinical Regal and Ethical Issues. Butterwork Heinmann: Oxford.Google Scholar
Holloway, F. (1994). Supervision Registers. Recent government policy and legislation. Psychiatric Bulletin 18, 593596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holloway, F. (1996). Supervised Discharge-paper tiger? Psychiatric Bulletin 20, 193194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
House of Commons. Health Committee (1993). Community Supervision Orders. Health Committee 5th Report. Vol 1. HMSO: London.Google Scholar
House of Commons. Health Committee (1994). Better Off in the Community? The Care of People Who Are Seriously Mentally III. Vol. I. HMSO: London.Google Scholar
Jenkins, R. (1992). Developments in the primary care of mental ill– nessa forward look. International Review of Psychiatry 4, 237242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, S., Brooks, L.., Ramsay, R. & Thornicroft, G. (1997). Structure and functioning of London's mental health services. In London's Mental Health (ed. Johnson, S. et al. ). King's Fund: London.Google Scholar
Kluiter, H. (1997). Inpatient treatment and care arrangements to replace or avoid itsearching for an evidence-based balance. Current Opinion in Psychiatry 10, 160167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kluiter, H., Giel, R.; Nienhuis, F.J.; Ruphan, M. & Wiersma, -D. (1992). Predicting feasibility of day treatment for unselected patients referred for inpatient psychiatric treatment: results of a randomised trial. American Journal of Psychiatry 149, 11991205.Google Scholar
Knapp, M., Beecham, J., Anderson, J., Dayson, D., O'Driscoll, C., Leff, J., Margolius, O. & Wills, W. (1990). The TAPS project 3. Predicting the costs of closing psychiatric hospitals. British Journal of Psychiatry 157, 661670.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lehman, A., Reed, S., Possidente, S. (1982). Priorities for long-term care: comments from board and care residents. Psychiatric Quarterly 54, 181189.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maden, A., Curie, C., Meux, C., Burrow, S. & Gunn, J. (1996). Treatment and Security Needs of Special Hospital Patients. Whurr Publishers.Google Scholar
Mental Health Foundation (1997). A Guide for Health and Social Service Commissioners. Draft.Google Scholar
Muijen, M. (1997). Inquiries: who needs them? Psychiatric Bulletin 21, 132133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murnane, M. (1997) Commissioning services for offenders with mental health problems.Measuring the performance of courtbased psychiatric assessment schemes (Mental Health Foundation, unpublished draft).Google Scholar
National Health Service Management Executive (1995). Quarterly Monitoring Report, Q2.Google Scholar
Philo, G: (1997) Changing media representations of mental health. Psychiatric Bulletin 21, 171172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ritchie, J.H., Dick, D. & Lingham, R. (1994). The Report of the Inquiry into the Care and Treatment of Christopher Clunis. HMSO: London.Google Scholar
Royal College of Psychiatrists (1993). Community Supervision Orders (Discussion Document). Royal College of Psychiatrists: London.Google Scholar
Royal College of Psychiatrists (1994). In Mental Health Services: Minutes of Evidence. Health Committee 24/2/94. HMSO: London.Google Scholar
Thornicroft, G. & Bebbington, P. (1989). Deinstitutionalisationfrom hospital closure to service development. British Journal of Psychiatry, 155, 739753.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tyrer, P., Morgan, J., Van Horn, E., Jayakody, M., Evans, K., Brummell, R., White, T., Baldwin, D., Harrison, Read P. & Johnson, T. (1995). A randomised controlled study of close monitoring of vulnerable psychiatric patients. Lancet 345, 756759.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yates, J. (1993). Tracking England's Water Tower Hospitals: Studying Closure Plans in English Mental Illness Hospitals. Prepared for the Mental Health Task Force. University of Birmingham: Birmingham.Google Scholar