Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-11T09:49:51.831Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Systematic review of the role of service users as researchers in mental health studies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 October 2011

Giovanni Salvi ,
Julia Jones  and
Mirella Ruggeri
Giovanni Salvi
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Medicina e Sanità Pubblica, Sezione di Psichiatria e Psicologia Clinica, Università di Verona, Verona
Julia Jones
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Medicina e Sanità Pubblica, Sezione di Psichiatria e Psicologia Clinica, Università di Verona, Verona
Mirella Ruggeri*
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Medicina e Sanità Pubblica, Sezione di Psichiatria e Psicologia Clinica, Università di Verona, Verona
*
Address for correspondence: Professor M. Kuggen, Dipartimento di Medicina e Sanità Pubblica, Sezione di Psichiatria e Psicologia ClinicaUniversità di Verona, Policlinico G.B. Rossi, P.le A.L. Scuro 10, 37134 Verona, Email: mirella.ruggeri@univr.it Fax: +39-045-585871
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Aims – Service user involvement in mental health service development and research is becoming more common in countries like the UK. USA and Canada. This systematic review of the international scientific literature has been carried out to assess the stage of development of mental health service users involvement in research. Method – Systematic review of any research project actively involving service users in any part of the research process. Results – Thirty-five studies met the inclusion and exclusion criteria and were included in the systematic review. Nine studies used quantitative techniques, 24 used qualitative techniques and two studies used both quantitative and qualitative techniques. While three studies were user-led, in three other studies the users were simply consulted but did not have any active role in the research. The remaining 29 studies were based on a collaboration between service users and professional researchers. Conclusions – The involvement of mental health service users in the research process is feasible both in quantitative and qualitative research studies. The involvement of service users in research has a number of benefits; such research requires more accurate planning and more time than the traditional research.

Declaration of Interest: none.

Keywords

consumer participationmental healthresearchqualitative research
Type
Original Articles
Information
Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences , Volume 14 , Issue 4 , December 2005 , pp. 217 - 226
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAFIA

Allam, S., Blyth, S., Fraser, A., Hodgson, S., Howes, J., Repper, J. & Newman, A. (2004). Our experience of collaborative research: Service users, carers and researchers work together to evaluate an assertive outreach service. Journal of Psychiatric & Mental Health Nursing 11, 368–373.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Allen, P.D. (1992). User involvement in a therapeutic community. Therapeutic communities. International Journal for Therapeutic & Supportive Organization 13, 253–263.Google Scholar
Battersby, M.W. (2004). Community models of mental care warrant more governmental support. British Medical Journal 329, 1140–1141.Google Scholar
Beresford, P. (2005). Developing (he theoretical basis for service user/survivor-led research and equal involvement in research. Epidemiologia e Psichiatria Sociale 14, 4–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byas, A., Hills, D., Meech, C.Read, L., Stacey, K., Thompson, E. & Wood, A. (2002). Co-researching consumer experiences of child and adolescent mental health services: Reflections and implications. Families, Systems & Health 20, 75–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, J. (1997). How consumers/survivors are evaluating the quality of psychiatric care. Evaluation Review 21, 357–363CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carrick, A., Mitchell, A. & Lloyd, K. (2001). User involvement in research: Power and compromise. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology 11, 217–225Google Scholar
Champ, S. (2002). Questionnaires from the heart: national agendas and private hopes. Nurse Researcher 9, 20–29.Google Scholar
Chow, S.L. (1987). Science. Ecological Validity and Experimentation. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 17, 181–194.Google Scholar
Clark, C.C., Scott, E.A., Boydell, K.M. & Goering, P. (1999). Effects of client interviewers on client-reported satisfaction with mental health services. Psychiatric Services 50, 961–963.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cockburn, L. & Trentham, B. (2002). Participatory action research: inte-grating community occupational therapy practice and research. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy - Revue Canadienne d Ergotherapie 69, 20–30.Google Scholar
Cook, S. & Ledger, K. (2004). A Service User-led study promoting mental well-being for the general public, using 5 rhythms dance. International Journal of Mental Health Promotion 6, 41–51.Google Scholar
Crawford, M.J., Rutter, D., Manley, C.Weaver, T., Bhui, K., Fulop, N. & Tyrer, P. (2002). Systematic review of involving patients in the planning and development of health care. British Medical Journal 325, 1263.Google Scholar
Everett, B. & Steven, L.D. (1989). Working together: a consumer participation research project to develop a new model of high-support housing. Canada's Mental Health 37, 28–32.Google ScholarPubMed
Faulkner, A. & Nicholls, V. (2001). Strategies for living. Managing Community Care 9, 32–36.Google Scholar
Faulkner, A. & Thomas, P. (2002). User-led research and evidence-based medicine. British Journal of Psychiatry 180, 1–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Forchuk, C.Jewell, J., Schofield, R., Sircelj, M. & Valledor, T. (1998). From hospital to community: bridging therapeutic relationships. Journal of Psychiatric & Mental Health Nursing 5, 197–202.Google Scholar
Freire, P. (1982). Creating alternative research methods: learning to do it by doing it. In Creating Knowledge: a Monopoly: Participatory Research in Development (ed. Hall, B.L., Gillette, A. and Tandom, R.), pp 29–40. Society for Participatory Research in Asia, and Toronto: International Council for Adult Education: New Delhi.Google Scholar
Frese, F.J. (2002). Ethics in neurobiological research: One consumer/provider's perspective. In Ethics in Community Mental Health Care: Commonplace Concerns (ed. Backlar, P. and David, L.), pp. 187–206. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers: New-York.Google Scholar
Glaser, B.G. & Strauss, A.L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine: Chicago.Google Scholar
Gopfert, M. & Mahoney, C. (2000). Participative research with users of mental health services who are parents. Clinical Psychology Forum 140, 11–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henry, A.D., Nicholson, J., Clayfield, J., Phillips, S. & Stier, L. (2002). Creating job opportunities for people with psychiatric disabilities at a university-based research center. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal 26, 181–190.Google Scholar
Hostick, T. & McClelland, F. (2000). ‘Partnership’: a co-operative inquiry between community mental health nurses and their clients. I. Research methodology, process and reflections. Journal of Psychiatric & Mental Health Nursing 7, 307–313.Google Scholar
Howard, P.B., Clark, J.J., Rayens, M.K., Hines-Martin, V., Weaver, P. & Littrell, R. (2001). Consumer satisfaction with services in a regional psychiatric hospital: a collaborative research project in Kentucky. Archives of Psychiatric Nursing 15, 10–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howard, P.B. & El-Mallakh, P. (2001). Training consumers to collect data in mental health service system evaluation research. Journal of Psychosocial Nursing & Mental Health Services 39, 30–39.Google Scholar
Kennedy, I. (2003). Patients are experts in their own field. British Medical Journal 326, 1276–1277.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lammers, J. & Happell, B. (2004). Mental health reforms and their impact on consumer and carer participation: a perspective from Victoria. Australia. Issues in Mental Health Nursing. 25, 261–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lasalvia, A., Rugged, M., Mazzi, M.A. & Dall'Agnola, R.B. (2000). The perception of needs for care in staff and patients in community-based mental health services. The South-Verona Outcome Project 3. Acta Psichiatrica Scandinavica 102, 366–375.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lasalvia, A., Ruggeri, M., Santolini, N. (2002) Subjective quality of life: its relationship with clinician-rated and patient-rated psychopathology. The South Verona Outcome Project 6. Psychoterapy and Psychosomatics, 71:275–284.Google Scholar
Lasalvia, A., Bonetto, C, Malchiodi, F., Salvi, G., Parabiaghi, A., Tansella, M. & Ruggeri, M. (2005). Listening to patients’ needs to improve their subjective quality of life. Psychological Medicine, 35, 1655–1665.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mayor, S. (2003). ECT may be better than drugs for short term depression. British Medical Journal 326, 569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAndrew, S. & Samociuk, G.A. (2003). Reflecting together: developing a new strategy for continuous user involvement in mental health nurse education. Journal of Psychiatric & Mental Health Nursing 10, 616–621.Google Scholar
McCourt, C.A. (2000). Life after hospital closure: users’ views of living in residential “resettlement” projects. A case study in consumer-led research. Health Expectations 3, 192–202.Google Scholar
McKenzie, K., Patel, V. & Araya, R. (2004). Learning from low income countries: mental health. British Medical Journal 329, 1138–1140.Google Scholar
McQuilken, M., Zahniser, J.H., Novak, J., Starks, R.D., Olmos, A. & Bond, G.R. (2003). The work project survey: Consumer perspective on work. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation 18, 59–68.Google Scholar
Mental Health Foundation (2004). Stategies for living. Retrieved 9 August 2005 from http://www.mentalhealth.org.uk/page.cfm7page-code=PICLPRSLOPPOGoogle Scholar
Morrell-Bellai, T.L. & Boydell, K.M. (1994). The experience of mental health consumers as researchers. Canadian Journal of Community Mental Health 13, 97–110.Google Scholar
National Institute of Clinical Excellence (2003). Guidance on the Use of Electroconvulsive Therapy. National Institute of Clinical Excellence: London.Google Scholar
Nelson, G., Ochocka, J., Griffin, K., Lord, J. & Wilfrid, L.U. (1998). “Nothing about me. without me”: participatory action research with self-help/mutual aid organizations for psychiatric consumer/survivors. American Journal of Community Psychology 26, 881–912.Google Scholar
Ochocka, J., Janzen, R. & Nelson, G. (2002). Sharing power and knowl-edge: professional and mental health consumer/survivor researchers working together in a participatory action research project. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal 25, 379–387.Google Scholar
O'Hagan, M. (2004). Force in mental health services: international user and survivor perspectives. Mental Health Practice 7, 12–17.Google Scholar
Perkins, R. (2001). What constitutes success? The relative priority of service users’ and clinicians’ views of mental health services. British Journal of Psychiatry 179, 9–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pilgrim, D., & Waldron, L. (1998). User involvement in mental health service development: How far can it go? Journal of Mental Health 7, 95–104.Google Scholar
Polowczyk, D.Brutus, M., Orvieto, A.A., Vidal, J. & Cipriani, D. (1993). Comparison of patient and staff surveys of consumer satisfaction. Hospital & Community Psychiatry 44, 589–591.Google ScholarPubMed
Pratt, C.W. & Gill, K.J. (1990). Sharing research knowledge to empower people who are chronically mentally ill. Psychosocial Rehabilitation Journal 13, 75–79.Google Scholar
Ramon, S. (2000). Participative menial health research: users and professional researchers working together. Mental Health Care 3, 224–228.Google Scholar
Ramon, S., Castillo, H. & Morant, N. (2001). Experiencing personality disorder: a participative research. International Journal of Social Psychiatry 47. 1–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reeve, P., Cornell, S., D Costa, B., Janzen, R. & Ochocka, J. (2002). From our perspective: consumer researchers speak abut their experience in a community mental health research project. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal 25, 403–408.Google Scholar
Rose, D. (2003). Partnership, co-ordination of care and the place of user involvement. Journal of Mental Health 12, 59–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, D., Fleischmann, P., Wykes, T., Leese, M. & Bindman, J. (2003). Patients’ perspectives on electroconvulsive therapy: systematic review. British Medical Journal 326, 1363–1365.Google Scholar
Rose, D., Wykes, T., Bindman, J. & Fleischmann, P. (2005). Information, consent and perceived coercion: patients’ perspectives on electroconvulsive therapy British Journal of Psychiatry 186, 54–59.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Royle, J., Steel, R., Hanley, B. & Bradburn, J. (2001). Getting Involved in Research: a Guide for Consumers. Consumer in NHS Support Unit: Eastleigh, Hampshire (UK).Google Scholar
Schneider, B., Scissons, H., Arney, L., Benson, C, Derry, J., Lucas, K., Misurelli, M., Nickerson, D. & Sunderland, M. (2004). Communication between people with schizophrenia and their medical professionals: a participatory research project. Qualitative Health Research 14, 562–577.Google Scholar
Simpson, E.L. & House, A.O. (2003). User and carer involvement in mental health services: from rhetoric to science. British Journal of Psychiatry 183, 89–91.Google Scholar
Slade, M.Leese, M, Ruggeri, M., Kuipers, E., Tansella, M. & Thornicroft, G. (2004). Does meeting needs improve quality of life? Psychotherapy and Psychosotnatics 73, 183–189.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, B. & O'Flynn, D. (2000). The use of qualitative strategies in participant and emancipatory research to evaluate disability service organizations. European Journal of Work & Organizational Psychology 9, 515–526.Google Scholar
Telford, R. & Faulkner, A. (2004). Learning about service user involvement in mental health research. Journal of Mental Health 13, 549–559.Google Scholar
Thornicroft, G. & Tansella, M. (2005). Growing recognition of the importance of service user involvement in mental health service planning and evaluation. Epidemiologia e Psichiatria Sociale 14, 1–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thornicroft, G., Rose, D., Huxley, P., Dae, G. & Wykes, T. (2002). What are the research priorities of mental health service users? Journal of mental health 11, 1–5.Google Scholar
Townend, M. & Braithwaite, T. (2002). Mental Health Research - the value of user involvement. Journal of Mental Health 11, 117–119.Google Scholar
Townsend, E., Birch, D.E., Langley, J. & Langille, L. (2000). Participatory research in a mental health clubhouse. Occupational Therapy Journal of Research 20, 18–44.Google Scholar
Trivedi, P. & Wykes, T. (2002). From passive subjects to equal partners: qualitative review of user involvement in research. British Journal of Psychiatry 181, 468–472.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Truman, C. & Raine, P. (2002). Experience and meaning of user involvement: some exploration from a community mental health project. Health & Social Care in the Community 10, 136–143.Google Scholar
UK ECT Review Group (2003). Efficacy and safety of electroconvulsive therapy in depressive disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet 361, 799–808.Google Scholar
Van Beinum, M. (2002) User-led research and evidence in psychiatry. Comments on the article by A. Faulkner and P. Thomas. British Journal of Psychiatry 180, 549–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vander Stoep, A., Williams, M., Jones, R., Green, L. & Trupin, E. (1999) Families as full research partners: what's in it for us? Journal of Behavioral Health Sen'ices & Research 26, 329–344.Google Scholar
Wallcraft, J. (2003). Mental health. Pay attention. Health Seirice Journal 5, 28–29.Google Scholar
Woodside, H. & Cikalo, P. (1995). Collaborative research: Perspectives on consumer-professional partnerships. Canada's Mental Health 43, 2–6.Google Scholar
Wykes, T.Blue skies in the Journal of Mental Health? Consumers in research. (2003). Journal of Mental Health 12, 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar