Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T02:01:22.021Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Cost-effectiveness of nidotherapy for comorbid personality disorder and severe mental illness: randomized controlled trial

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 April 2011

Maja Ranger ,
Peter Tyrer ,
Katerina Miloseska ,
Hannalie Fourie ,
Ibrahim Khaleel ,
Bernard North  and
Barbara Barrett
Maja Ranger
Affiliation:
Department of Psychological Medicine
Peter Tyrer*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychological Medicine
Katerina Miloseska
Affiliation:
Central North West London Trust
Hannalie Fourie
Affiliation:
Central North West London Trust
Ibrahim Khaleel
Affiliation:
Central North West London Trust
Bernard North
Affiliation:
Statistical Advisory Service, Imperial College, London SW7 2AZ (United Kingdom)
Barbara Barrett
Affiliation:
Centre for the Economics of Mental Health, Institute of Psychiatry (United Kingdom)
*
Professor P. Tyrer, Department of Psychological Medicine, Imperial College, St Dunstan's Road, London W6 8RP (United Kingdom). E-mail: p.tyrer@imperial.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Aims – Nidotherapy is the systematic modification of the environment to create a better fit for people. This is the first randomized controlled trial of its efficacy in an assertive community team. Methods – Patients in an assertive outreach team with continued management problems together with comorbid personality disturbance and severe mental illness were randomized to nidotherapy enhanced assertive treatment (up to 12 sessions) or to continued assertive outreach care. Use of psychiatric beds over one years (primary outcome) and change from base-line in other health service resources, psychiatric symptoms, social functioning and engagement with services were measured at 6 and 12 months (secondary outcomes). Results – 52 patients were recruited over 13 months, with 49 and 37 assessed at 6 and 12 months. Patients referred to nidotherapy had a 63% reduction in hospital bed use after one year compared with control assertive care (P=0.13) and showed non-significant improvement in psychiatric symptoms, social functioning and engagement than the control group. The mean cost savings for each patient allocated to nidotherapy was £4,112 per year, mainly as a consequence of reduced psychiatric bed use. Conclusion – Nidotherapy may be a cost-effective option in the management of comorbid serious mental illness and personality disorder, but larger confirmatory trials are necessary.

Keywords

nidotherapyassertive outreachrandomised trialcost-effectiveness.
Type
Original Articles
Information
Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences , Volume 18 , Issue 2 , June 2009 , pp. 128 - 136
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amaddeo, F. & Tansella, M. (2007). Economics of mental health: new challenges and new perspectives. Epidemiologia e PsichiatriaSociale 16, 279–281.Google ScholarPubMed
Barrett, B. & Byford, S. (2003). Acceptable mental health care: a newdecision-making tool for cost-effectiveness analysis. Mental Health Research Review 9, 39–41.Google Scholar
Barrett, B. & Byford, S. (2007). Collecting service use data for economic evaluation in DSPD populations: development of the Secure Facilities Service Use Schedule British Journal of Psychiatry 190, Suppl. 49, s75– s78.Google Scholar
Briggs, Andrew H (2001) A Bayesian approach to stochastic cost-effectiveness analysis: an illustration and application to blood pressure control in Type 2 diabetes. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 17, 69–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
British Medical Association & Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain (2004). British National Formulary 48.BMJ Books/ Pharmaceutical Press: London.Google Scholar
Campbell, M., Fitzpatrick, R., Haines, A., Sandercock, P., Spiegelhalter, D. & Tyrer, P. (2000). A framework for the design and evaluation of complex interventions to improve health. British Medical Journal 321, 694–696.Google Scholar
Curtis, L. & Netten, A. (2005). Unit Costs of Health and Social Care. Personal Social Services Research Unit: Canterbury.Google Scholar
Davidson, L., Miller, R. & Flanagan, E. (2008). What's in it for me? The utility of psychiatric treatments from the perspective of the person in recovery. Epidemiologia e Psichiatria Sociale 17, 177–181.Google Scholar
Department of Health (2005). NHS Reference Costs. Department of Health: London.Google Scholar
Efron, B. & Tibshirani, R.J. (1993). An Introduction to the Bootstrap. Chapman & Hall: New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fenwick, E. & Byford, S. (2005). A guide to cost-effectiveness acceptability curves. British Journal of Psychiatry 187, 106–108.Google Scholar
Finn, W., Hyslop, J. & Truman, C. (2000). Mental Health, Multiple Needs and the Police. Revolving Doors Agency: London.Google Scholar
Goldberg, D. (2008). Improved investment in mental health services: value for money? British Journal of Psychiatry 192, 88–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
HM Prison Service (2005). Prison Service Annual Report and Accounts. HM Prison Service: London.Google Scholar
Johnson, S. (2008). So what shall we do about assertive community treatment? Epidemiologia e Psichiatria Sociale 17, 110–114.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Legal Services Commission (2003). General Criminal Contract. Legal Services Commission: London.Google Scholar
Overall, J.E. & Gorman, D.L. (1962). The brief psychiatric rating scale. Psychological Reports 10, 799–812.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ranger, M., Methuen, C., Rutter, D., Rao, B. & Tyrer, P. (2004). Prevalence of personality disorder in the caseload of an inner city assertive outreach team. Psychiatric Bulletin 28, 441–443.Google Scholar
Schinnar, A.P., Rothbard, A.B., Kanter, R. & Jung, Y.S. (1990). An empirical literature review of definitions of severe and persistent mental illness. American Journal of Psychiatry 147, 1602–1608.Google ScholarPubMed
Spencer, S-J., Rutter, D. & Tyrer, P. (in press). Integration of nidotherapy into the management of mental illness and antisocial personality: a qualitative study. International Journal of Social Psychiatry.Google Scholar
Thompson, A., Shaw, M., Harrison, G., Ho, D., Gunnell, D. & Verne, J. (2004). Patterns of hospital admission for adult psychiatric illness in England: analysis of Hospital Episode Statistics data. British Journal of Psychiatry 185, 334–341.Google Scholar
Thompson, S.G. & Barber, J. (2000). How should cost data in pragmatic randomised trials be analysed? British Medical Journal 320, 1197–1200.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tyrer, P. (2000). Personality Assessment Schedule: PAS-I (ICD-10 version). In Personality Disorders: Diagnosis, Management and Course (ed. P., Tyrer), pp. 160–180. Arnold: London.Google Scholar
Tyrer, P. (2002). Nidotherapy: a new approach to the treatment of personality disorder. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 105, 469–471.Google Scholar
Tyrer, P. (2007). The future of specialist community teams in the care of those with severe mental illness. Epidemiologia e Psichiatria Sociale 16, 225–230.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tyrer, P. (2008). Personality disorder and public mental health. Clinical Medicine 8, 423–427.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tyrer, P. (2009). Nidotherapy: Harmonising the Environment with the Patient. RCPsych Publications: London.Google Scholar
Tyrer, P. & Bajaj, P. (2005). Nidotherapy: making the environment do the therapeutic work. Advances in Psychiatric Treatment 11, 232–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyrer, P. & Johnson, T. (1996). Establishing the severity of personality disorder. American Journal of Psychiatry 153, 1593–1597.Google ScholarPubMed
Tyrer, P. & Kramo, K. (2007). Nidotherapy in practice. Journal of Mental Health 16, 117–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyrer, P., Sensky, T., & Mitchard, S. (2003a). The principles of nidotherapy in the treatment of persistent mental and personality disorders. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics 72, 350–356.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tyrer, P., Mitchard, S., Methuen, C. & Ranger, M. (2003b). Treatmentrejecting and treatment-seeking personality disorders: Type R and Type S. Journal of Personality Disorders 17, 265–270.Google Scholar
Tyrer, P., Nur, U., Crawford, M., Karlsen, S., McLean, C., Rao, B. & Johnson, T (2005). The Social Functioning Questionnaire: a rapid and robust measure of perceived functioning. International Journal of Social Psychiatry 51, 265–275.Google Scholar
Welsh, A.H. & Zhou, X.H. (2006). Estimating the retransformed mean in a heteroscedastic two-part model. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 136, 860–881.Google Scholar