Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T04:02:11.486Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Systematic reviews and the Cochrane Collaboration: improving the evidence-base for all psychiatric treatments

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 October 2011

Rachel Churchill
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Editorials
Information
Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences , Volume 12 , Issue 3 , September 2003 , pp. 137 - 145
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2003

References

REFERENCES

Adams, C.E., Power, A., Frederick, K. & Lefebvre, C. (1994). An investigation of the adequacy of MEDLINE searches for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of the effects of mental health care. Psychological Medicine 24, 741–748.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Antman, E.M., Lau, J., Kupelnick, B., Mosteller, F. & Chalmers, T.C. (1992). A comparison of results of meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials and recommendations of clinical experts. Journal of the American Medical Association 268, 240–248.Google Scholar
Chalmers, I. & Altman, D.G. (1995). Systematic Reviews. BMJ: London.Google Scholar
Churchill, R., Hunot, V., Corney, R., Knapp, M., McGuire, H., Tylee, A. & Wessely, S. (2001). A systematic review of controlled trials of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of brief psychological treatments for depression. Health Technology Assessment Monograph 5 (35), 1–173.Google ScholarPubMed
Churchill, R., Hunot, V., Corney, R., Knapp, M., McGuire, H., Tylee, A. & Wessely, S. (2003). Brief psychological therapies versus treatment as usual for depression (Protocol for a Cochrane Review). Cochrane Library Issue 1.Google Scholar
Clarke, M. & Oxman, A.D. (eds.) (2000). Cochrane Reviewers' Handbook 4.1 [updated June 2000]. In Review Manager (RevMan) Version 4.1. [Computer program]. The Cochrane Collaboration: Oxford.Google Scholar
Davey Smith, G., Song, F. & Sheldon, T.A. (1993). Cholesterol lowering and mortality: the importance of considering initial levels of risk. British Medical Journal 306, 1367–1373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickersin, K. (1990). The existence of publication bias and risk factors for its occurrence. Journal of the American Medical Association, 263, 1385–1339.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Easterbrook, P.J., Berlin, J., Gopalan, R. & Matthews, D.R. (1991). Publication bias in clinical research. Lancet 337, 867–872.Google Scholar
Egger, M., Davey Smith, G. & Altman, D.G. (2001). Systematic Reviews in Healthcare: Meta-analysis in Context. BMJ: London.Google Scholar
Hotopf, M., Lewis, G. & Normand, C. (1997). Putting trials on trial: the costs and consequences of small trials in depression: a systematic review of methodology. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 51, 354–358.Google Scholar
Juni, P., Witschi, A., Bloch, R. & Egger, M. (1999). The hazards of scoring the quality of clinical trials for meta-analysis. Journal of the American Medical Association 282, 1054–1060.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lewis, G., Churchill, R. & Hotopf, M. (1997). Systematic reviews and meta-analysis. Psychological Medicine 27, 3–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Linde, K. & Mulrow, C.D. (2003). St John's wort for depression (Cochrane Review). Cochrane Library Issue 1.Google Scholar
Mulrow, C.D. (1994). Rationale for systematic reviews. British Medical Journal 309 (6954), 597–599.Google Scholar
Pittler, M.H. & Ernst, E. (2003). Kava extract for treating anxienty. (Cochrane Review). Cochrane Library Issue 1.Google Scholar
Rose, S. & Bisson, J., Wessely, S. (2003). Psychological debriefing for preventing post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) (Cochrane Review). Cochrane Library Issue 1.Google Scholar
Sterling, T.D. (1959). Publication decisions and their possible effects on inferences drawn from tests of significance or vice versa. Journal of the American Statistical Association 54, 30–34.Google Scholar
Sterling, T.D., Rosenbaum, W.L. & Weinkam, J.J. (1995). Publication decisions revisited: the effect of outcome of statistical tests on the decision to publish and vice versa. American Statistician 49, 108–112.Google Scholar
Stern, M.J. & Simes, R.J. (1997). Publications bias: evidence of delayed publication in a cohort study of clinical research projects. British Medical Journal 315, 640–645.Google Scholar
Thornley, B. & Adams, C. (1998). Content and quality of 2000 controlled trials in schizophrenia over 50 years. British Medical Journal 317, 1181–1184.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed