Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T06:02:24.276Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The entropy of a special overlapping dynamical system

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 November 2012

MICHAEL BARNSLEY ,
BRENDAN HARDING  and
ANDREW VINCE
MICHAEL BARNSLEY
Affiliation:
The Australian National University, Canberra, Australia (email: michael.barnsley@anu.edu.au, brendan.harding@anu.edu.au)
BRENDAN HARDING
Affiliation:
The Australian National University, Canberra, Australia (email: michael.barnsley@anu.edu.au, brendan.harding@anu.edu.au)
ANDREW VINCE
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA (email: avince@ufl.edu)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The term special overlapping refers to a certain simple type of piecewise continuous function from the unit interval to itself and also to a simple type of iterated function system (IFS) on the unit interval. A correspondence between these two classes of objects is used (1) to find a necessary and sufficient condition for a fractal transformation from the attractor of one special overlapping IFS to the attractor of another special overlapping IFS to be a homeomorphism and (2) to find a formula for the topological entropy of the dynamical system associated with a special overlapping function.

Type
Research Article
Information
Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems , Volume 34 , Issue 2 , April 2014 , pp. 483 - 500
Copyright
©2012 Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1]Adler, R. L., Kohheim, A. G. and McAndrew, M. M.. Topological entropy. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 114 (1965), 309–319.Google Scholar
[2]Barnsley, M. F., Harding, B. and Igudesman, K.. How to transform and filter images using iterated function systems. SIAM J. Imaging Sci. 4 (2011), 1001–1028.Google Scholar
[3]Barnsley, M. F.. Transformations between self-referential sets. Amer. Math. Monthly 116 (2009), 291–304.Google Scholar
[4]Barnsley, M. F. and Vince, A.. Fractal homeomorphism for bi-affine iterated function systems. J. Applied Nonlinear Science to appear. Preprint, 2011.Google Scholar
[5]Collet, P. and Eckmann, J.-P.. Iterated Maps on the Interval as Dynamical Systems, Reprint of the 1980 edition. Modern Birkhäuser Classics, Birkhäuser Boston Inc, Boston, MA, 2009.Google Scholar
[6]Hofbauer, F. and Keller, G.. Ergodic properties of invariant measures for piecewise monotonic transformations. Math. Z. 180 (1982), 119–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7]Hutchinson, J. E.. Fractals and self-similarity. Indiana Univ. Math. J. 30 (1981), 713–747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Keane, M., Smorodinsky, M. and Solomyak, B.. Morphology of c-expansions with deleted digits. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 347 (1995), 955–966.Google Scholar
[9]Kenyon, R.. Projecting the one-dimensional Sierpinski gasket. Israel J. Math. 97 (1997), 221–238.Google Scholar
[10]Lau, K. S. and Ngai, S. M.. Multifractional measures and a weak separation condition. Adv. Math. 141 (1999), 993–1010.Google Scholar
[11]Milnor, J. and Thurston, W.. On Iterated Maps of the Interval (Lecture Notes in Mathematics, 1342). 1988, pp. 465–563.Google Scholar
[12]Misiurewicz, M. and Schlenk, W.. Entropy of piecewise monotone mappings. Studia Math. 67 (1980), 45–63.Google Scholar
[13]Parry, W.. Symbolic dynamics and transformations of the unit interval. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc 122 (1966), 368–378.Google Scholar
[14]Peres, Y. and Schlag, W.. Smoothness of projections, Bernoulli convolutions and the dimension of exceptions. Duke Math. J. 102 (2000), 193–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[15]Peres, Y. and Solomyak, B.. Absolute continuity of Bernoulli convolutions: a simpler proof. Math. Res. Lett. 3 (1996), 231–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[16]Peres, Y. and Solomyak, B.. Self-similar measures and intersection of Cantor sets. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 350 (1998), 4065–4087.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[17]Pollicott, M. and Simon, K.. The Hausdorff dimension of k-expansions with deleted digits. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 347 (1995), 967–983.Google Scholar
[18]Peres, Y., Schlag, W. and Solomyak, B.. Sixty years of Bernoulli convolutions. Prog. Probab. 46 (2000), 39–65.Google Scholar
[19]Renyi, A.. Representations for real numbers and their ergodic properties. Acta Math. Acad. Sci Hungar. 8 (1957), 477–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[20]Solomyak, B.. On the random series ∑ ±λ n (an Erdös problem). Ann. of Math. (2) 142 (1995), 611–625.Google Scholar
[21]Zerner, M. P. W.. Weak separation properties for self-similar sets. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 124 (1996), 3529–3539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar