Both the numbers of children undergoing day case surgery and the type of procedures performed in this way are increasing. This expansion will only be beneficial if anaesthesia and surgery are provided with minimal postoperative morbidity e.g. postoperative delirium or nausea and vomiting. The choice of anaesthetic technique is considered critical to optimizing the service provided to patients and for this reason much research has addressed this question. This review considers the effect of anaesthetic technique on postoperative outcome in paediatric day case surgery. The outcome measures reviewed by this article are induction of anaesthesia, effects on the cardiovascular system, recovery from anaesthesia and postoperative nausea and vomiting. In each section both quantitative and qualitative outcome measures are discussed. Comparisons are made between sevoflurane and halothane, sevoflurane and propofol, propofol and halothane, desflurane and halothane and the presence or absence of nitrous oxide.

Background and objective: Clinical sedation assessment becomes insufficient in deeply sedated patients. Bispectral index as a processed electroencephalogram parameter provides a continuous and observer-independent value reported to change with sedation. The aim of this prospective observational study was to determine the reliability and possible confounding factors of the bispectral index to assess sedation in surgical intensive care patients.

Methods: Following major surgery, bispectral index, body temperature and electromyographic activity of 44 ventilated patients were recorded. Sedation levels were assessed with Ramsay sedation score.

Results: Although bispectral index correlated with Ramsay sedation score (-0.64; P < 0.01) we found that in deeply sedated patients temperature instability and electromyographic activity increased bispectral index. Bispectral index correlated significantly with electromyographic activity (0.80; P < 0.01) and with an increase of body temperature (0.55; P < 0.01) not only in all patients but also in clinically deeply sedated patients (0.57; P < 0.01 and 0.46; P < 0.05).

Conclusions: Only under certain conditions, such as low muscular activity and body temperature stability, may the bispectral index be a useful addition to clinical scoring in the sedation assessment of critically ill patients.

Background and objective: Amiodarone is very effective against a variety of dysrhythmias but has poor pharmacodynamic properties and many undesired side-effects. Its short- and rapid-acting derivative E 047/1 may circumvent some of these drawbacks. It is easier to titrate while retaining the high efficacy of amiodarone and may have acceptable influences on haemodynamics and cardiac conduction in patients who develop serious, destabilizing ventricular tachydysrhythmias after cardiac surgery.

Methods: Testing E 047/1 was performed prospectively in two consecutive phase II open, clinical studies. Out of 504 patients scheduled for surgery using cardiopulmonary bypass for coronary artery grafting and/or valve repair, 35 developed serious, haemodynamically destabilizing ventricular dysrhythmias (Lown 2-Lown 4b) after surgery and were treated with a 1 mg kg−1 (pilot study, n = 15) or randomized to a 2 or 3 mg kg−1 bolus of E 047/1, followed by a 1 mg kg−1 h−1 continuous infusion for 2 h (n = 10 in each group). Dysrhythmias, PQ, QTc intervals and haemodynamics using the thermodilution technique were evaluated for up to 24 h after drug initiation.

Results: At the time of final inclusion the patients had between 6 and 12 (or more) ventricular ectopics per minute. Within the first 2–3 min of application in the pilot trial E 047/1induced a decrease of ventricular dysrhythmias to between 0 and 4 per min, a decrease that held for the duration of treatment. The area under the curve decreased from 434 (322, 855; median, quartiles) to 114 (9, 477, P < 0.01) events per hour. In the randomized trial, E 047/1 administered in either dose rapidly reduced ventricular dysrhythmias at least as effectively as in the pilot trial 565 (478, 701) to 33 (8, 238, P < 0.05) after a 2 mg bolus; 482 (339, 482) to 95 (13, 540, P < 0.01) events per hour after a 3 mg bolus. Approximately 4-6 h after drug termination, dysrhythmias reappeared in the majority of patients. In only three patients did the incidence of dysrhythmias return to inclusion criteria levels. In contrast to the pilot trial, in the randomized trial there was a slight increase of mean pulmonary artery pressure, central venous pressure and pulmonary arterial wedge pressure and a slight decrease of LCW I in both groups. E 047/1 did not cause QTc prolongation.

Conclusions: E 047/1 appears to be a safe alternative to amiodarone in the perioperative setting of cardiac surgery when serious, destabilizing dysrhythmias occur.

Background and objective: Postoperative renal impairment is a recognized complication of infrarenal aortic cross-clamping. Our hypothesis was that the renal vasodilating and natriuretic effects of fenoldopam mesylate, a selective dopamine (DA1) agonist, would preserve renal function in patients undergoing elective infrarenal aortic cross-clamping.

Methods: A prospective, randomized, double blind controlled clinical trial was performed. Twenty-eight ASA II-III patients undergoing elective aortic surgery requiring infrarenal aortic cross-clamping were studied. According to random allocation, patients received either fenoldopam (0.1 μg kg−1 min−1) or placebo intravenously prior to surgical skin incision until release of the aortic clamp. Plasma creatinine, creatinine clearance, urinary output, fractional excretion of sodium, and free water clearance were measured: (a) prior to admission to hospital; (b) during the period from insertion of the urinary catheter until application of the aortic cross-clamp; (c) during the period of aortic cross-clamping; (d) 0-4 h, and (e) 4-8 h after release of the clamp and on days 1, 2, 3, and 5 postoperatively.

Results: Fenoldopam (0.1 μg kg−1 min−1) administration was not associated with haemodynamic instability. On application of the aortic cross-clamp creatinine clearance decreased significantly in the placebo (83 ± 20 to 42 ± 29 mLmin−1 (mean ± SD)) (P < 0.01) but not in the fenoldopam group, and this decrease persisted for at least 8 h after release of the cross-clamp (83 ± 20 to 54 ± 33 mLmin−1 (mean ± SD)) (P < 0.05). Plasma creatinine concentration increased significantly from baseline on the first postoperative day in the placebo group (87 ± 12 to 103 ± 28 μmol L−1 (mean ± SD)) (P < 0.01) but not in the fenoldopam group.

Conclusions: These findings are consistent with the hypothesis that fenoldopam possesses a renoprotective effect during and after infrarenal aortic cross-clamping.

Background and objective: The removal of the non-functioning liver in cases of fulminant liver failure has been advocated by some authors as a means of improving haemodynamic instability and acid-base disturbances associated with acute liver failure.

Methods: The aim of the present experimental study was to investigate whether maintaining a non-functioning liver is preferable over removing it in terms of haemodynamic variables, after acute hepatic failure has been surgically induced. Twenty Landrace pigs were used in the study. All of them underwent portocaval anastomosis and ligation of the hepatic artery. After an 18-h period and with biochemical indices of fulminant hepatic failure clearly demonstrated, the animals were randomly assigned to one of two groups: in 10 pigs (Group A) the ischaemic liver was left in situ and no further surgical intervention was undertaken. The other 10 (Group B) underwent total hepatectomy. Haemodynamic monitoring was the same in both groups. No inotropes were administered throughout the whole period of observation.

Results: Haemodynamic deterioration was observed in the hepatectomized pigs (Group B) whereas the group with the ischaemic liver in situ (Group A) remained stable in terms of the haemodynamic variables evaluated until the end of the experiment. (Cardiac index in Group A 7.59 ± 1.25 Lmin−1 m-2 vs. 2.92 ± 0.68 Lmin−1 m−2 in Group B, P < 0.05.)

Conclusions: The concept of salvage hepatectomy in cases of acute liver failure should be redefined since there seems to be some experimental evidence that it may not be as beneficial as originally thought.

Background and objective: To compare the efficacy of tramadol and ondansetron in minimizing the pain due to injection of propofol in 100 patients.

Methods: An intravenous cannula was inserted in the dorsum of the hand. After tourniquet application to the forearm, tramadol 50 mg (Group 1, n = 50) or ondansetron 4 mg (Group 2, n = 50) was injected. The tourniquet was released after 20 s, and propofol 5 mL was administered over 5 s. The patients were observed and asked if they had pain in the arm and the response was assessed. Nausea and vomiting and degree of sedation were recorded for the first postoperative 24 h.

Results: Twenty-one patients in Group 1 and 14 patients in Group 2 reported no pain. Slight pain was seen in 15 patients in Group 1 and in 18 patients in Group 2. Moderate pain was seen in 10 patients in Group 1 and 15 patients in Group 2. Severe pain was seen in four of the patients in Group 1 and three patients in Group 2. There was no significant difference of pain between Groups 1 and 2, but we found a significant reduction of nausea and vomiting in the ondansetron group compared with the tramadol group (P = 0.033).

Conclusions: Tramadol or ondansetron are equally effective in preventing pain from propofol injection. The added benefit of a reduction in nausea and vomiting after operation in the ondansetron group may be a reason to prefer this drug.

Background and objective: Magnesium has antinociceptive effects in animal and human models of pain. These effects are primarily based on the regulation of calcium influx into the cell. The aim of this study was to determine whether perioperative infusion of magnesium would reduce postoperative pain and anxiety.

Methods: Twenty-four patients, undergoing elective hysterectomy, received a bolus of 30 mg kg−1 magnesium sulphate or the same volume of isotonic sodium chloride solution intravenously before the start of surgery and 0.5 g h−1 infusion for the next 20 h. Intraoperative and postoperative analgesia were achieved with fentanyl and morphine respectively. Patients were evaluated pre- and postoperatively for anxiety.

Results: Fentanyl consumption and total morphine requirements were significantly decreased in the magnesium group compared to the control group. Postoperative anxiety scores and sedation were similar between groups.

Conclusions: Continuous magnesium infusion, including the pre-, intra-, and postoperative periods reduces analgesic requirements. These results demonstrate that magnesium can be an adjuvant for perioperative analgesic management.

Background and objective: This study was performed to identify risk factors for complications and in-hospital mortality associated with pneumonectomy.

Methods: The influence of fluid balance during anaesthesia was evaluated, taking into account the patient's age, gender and body mass index, smoking habits, history of pulmonary or cardiac disorders, the site of pneumonectomy and duration of anaesthesia. One-hundred-and-seven patients undergoing elective pneumonectomy were included in the study.

Results: A total of 31 patients (29%) suffered from one or more postoperative complications, seven (22.4%) of these had severe dysrhythmias, six (19.6%) had pulmonary complications and three (9.3%) had cardiovascular complications. The overall mortality rate was 10.3%.

Conclusions: Based on logistic regression analysis, our data indicate the following risk factors for postoperative complications: positive fluid balance exceeding 4000 mL during anaesthesia (pulmonary complications and mortality), body mass index < 17 or > 25 kg m−2 (severe dysrhythmias), or history of chronic heart disease (pulmonary complications). Thirteen patients (12.4%) suffered from a fluid balance 4000 ml during anaesthesia. Regression analysis indicated that fluid balance exceeding 4000 mL was associated with a higher risk of postoperative complications than blood loss exceeding 1000 mL and to be the strongest risk factor for postoperative pulmonary complications and in-hospital mortality. Further trials estimating the effect of restrictive fluid regimens and the use of vasopressors for blood pressure control during anaesthesia must be carried out.

Background and objective: To evaluate the efficacy and optimal dose of prophylactic intravenous ephedrine for the prevention of maternal hypotension associated with spinal anaesthesia for Caesarean section.

Methods: After patients had received an intravenous preload of 0.5 L of lactated Ringer's solution, spinal anaesthesia was administered in the sitting position with hyperbaric bupivacaine 2.5 mL 0.5% combined with 25 μg fentanyl. A total of 68 patients were randomized to receive a simultaneous 2 mL bolus intravenously of either 0.9% saline (Group C, n = 20), ephedrine 6 mg (Group E-6, n = 24), or ephedrine 12 mg (Group E-12, n = 22). Further rescue boluses of ephedrine 6 mg were given if systolic arterial pressure fell to below 90 mmHg, greater than 30% below baseline, or if symptoms suggestive of hypotension were reported.

Results: There was a significantly higher incidence of hypotension in Group C (60% patients) compared to Group E-12 (27%), but not in Group E-6 (50%). The 95% Confidence Interval for the difference in proportions between Groups C and E-12 was 6-60%, P < 0.05. Fewer rescue boluses of ephedrine were required in Group E-12 compared with Group C (1.8 ± 1.2 vs. 3.3 ± 2.1, P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in the incidence of maternal nausea or vomiting, or of neonatal acidaemia between groups.

Conclusion: A prophylactic bolus of ephedrine 12 mg intravenously given at the time of intrathecal block, plus rescue boluses, leads to a lower incidence of hypotension following spinal anaesthesia for elective Caesarean section compared to intravenous rescue boluses alone.

Background and objective: Auditory impairment is among the lesser known complications of spinal analgesia. The aim of the present study was to determine the degree of vestibulocochlear dysfunction in patients undergoing spinal analgesia for lower abdominal surgery.

Methods: Eighty patients who had received spinal analgesia for lower abdominal surgery were studied. Males were undergoing inguinal herniorraphy and the females tubectomy. Audiograms were performed before operation and on the second and seventh postoperative days. Hearing levels were measured from 250 Hz-8 kHz. In Group 1 (n = 40) a 22-gauge, cutting type of spinal needle (Howard Jones) was used. In Group 2 (n = 40) a 25-gauge, non-cutting spinal needle (Whitacre) was used.

Results: Hearing loss ' 10 dB was noticed in three patients in Group 1 and none in Group 2. The mean hearing level was more reduced in Group 1 patients.

Conclusions: Use of cutting type spinal needle is associated with a greater decrease in mean hearing levels compared to the non-cutting type.