No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Can Practitioners Do Better at Risk Communication? Using Evidence to Develop Best Practice
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 20 January 2017
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Reports
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010
References
1 Powell, Douglass and Leiss, William, Mad Cows and Mothers Milk (Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press 1997).Google Scholar
2 Lok, Corie and Powell, Douglass A., The Belgian Dioxin Crisis of the Summer of 1999: A Case Study in Crisis Communication and Management (Guelph, Ont.: Department of Food Science, University of Guelph 2000).Google Scholar
3 Horton, Richard, MMR: Science and Fiction (London: Granta Books 2003)Google Scholar; Bouder, Frederic, “A Comparative Analysis of Risk Perception Related to Human Health Issues”, in Richter, Ingo K., Berking, Sabine and Müller-Schmid, Ralf (eds), Risk Society and the Culture of Precaution (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan 2006).Google Scholar
4 Leiss, William and Chociolko, Christina, Risk and Responsibility (Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press 1994)Google Scholar; Leiss, William, In the Chamber of Risks: Understanding risk controversies (Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press 2001)Google Scholar; Powell and Leiss, supra note 1.
5 Lofstedt, Ragnar E., “Risk communication: The Barsebäck nuclear plant case”, 24(8) Energy Policy 1996, pp. 689 et sqq., at p. 696CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Lofstedt, Ragnar E., Risk Management in Post-Trust Societies (Basingstoke: Palgrave 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6 Covello, Vincent T., McCallum, David B. and Pavlova, Marie, “Principles and guidelines for improving risk communication”, in Covello, Vincent T., McCallum, David B. and Pavlova, Marie (eds), Effective risk communication (New York: Plenum 1989), pp. 3 et sqq., at p. 16Google Scholar; Leiss, William, Prospects and Problems in Risk Communcation (Waterloo: University of Waterloo Press 1989)Google Scholar; Chess, Caron, Salomone, Kandice L. and Hance, Billie Jo, “Managing risk communication agency reality: Research priorities”, 15 Risk Analysis (1995) pp. 128 et sqq., at p. 136CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Granger Morgan, M. and Fischhoff, Baruch, Risk Communication (New York: Cambridge University Press 2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Lofstedt, Ragnar E., “Risk communication: pitfalls and promises”, 11(03) European Review (2003), pp. 417 et sqq., at p. 435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Breakwell, Glynis M., The psychology of risk (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7 Burton, Ian and Kates, Robert W., “The perception of natural hazards in resource management”, 3(3) Natural Resources Journal (1964), pp. 412 et sqq., at p. 441Google Scholar; Burton, Ian, Kates, Robert W. and White, Gilbert F., Environment as Hazard, 1st and 2d ed. (New York: Oxford University Press 1978 and 1992)Google Scholar; White, Gilbert F., “Human Adjustment to Floods”, Department of Geography Research Paper no. 29 (Chicago: The University of Chicago 1945)Google Scholar; White, Gilbert F., “The choice of use in resource management”, 1 Natural Resource Journal (1961), pp. 23 et sqq., at p. 40.Google Scholar
8 Fischhoff, Baruch, Lichtenstein, Sarah, Slovic, Paul, Derby, Stephen and Keeney, Ralph, Acceptable Risk (New York: Cambridge University Press 1981)Google Scholar; Slovic, Paul, “Perception of Risk”, 236 Science, pp. 280 et sqq., at p. 285.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9 HSE, Improving health and safety, An analysis of HSE's risk communication in the 21st century, prepared by King's College London, Research report RR785, (Her majesty's Stationary Office: Norwich 2010).Google Scholar
10 NRC, Improving Risk Communication (Washington DC: National Academy Press 1989), at p.21.Google Scholar
11 Renn, Ortwin, Risk Governance: Coping with Uncertainty in a Complex World (London: Earthscan 2008).Google Scholar
12 Fischhoff, Baruch, Bostrom, Ann. and Jacobs-Quadrel, Marilyn, “Risk Perception and Communication”, 14 Annual Review of Public Health (1993), pp. 183 et sqq., at p. 203.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13 Lofstedt, , “Risk Management in Post-Trust Societies”, supra note 5.Google Scholar
14 Leiss, William, “Three phases in the evolution of risk communication practice”, in Kunreuther, Howard and Slovic, Paul (eds), Special Issue of the Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 545 (May) Challenges in Risk Assessment and Risk Management (1996), pp. 84 et sqq., at. p. 95.Google Scholar
15 Fischhoff, Baruch, “Risk Perception and Communication Unplugged: Twenty Years of Process”, 15(2) Risk Analysis (1995), pp. 137 et sqq., at p. 145.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16 Lave, Lester B., “Health and Safety Risk Analyses: Information for Better Decisions”, 236 Science (1987), pp. 291 et sqq., at p. 295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17 Bostrom, Anne, Atman, Cynthia J., Fischhoff, Baruch and Granger Morgan, M., “Evaluating risk communications: completing and correcting mental models of hazardous processes”, 14 Risk Analysis (1994), Part II, pp. 789 et sqq., at p. 798CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed; Granger Morgan, M., Fischhoff, Baruch, Bostrom, Ann and Atman, Cynthia J., Risk Communication: A Mental Models Approach (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18 Freudenberg, William R. and Pastor, Susan K., “NIMBYs and LULUs: Stalking the syndromes”, 48(4) Journal of Social Issues (1992), pp. 39 et sqq., at. p. 62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19 Fischhoff, Baruch, “Value elicitation: Is there anything in there?”, 46 American Psychologist (1991), pp. 835 et sqq., at p. 847CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Fischhoff, Baruch, Slovic, Paul and Lichtenstein, Sarah, “Knowing what you want: Measuring labile values”, in Wallstein, Thomas (ed.), Cognitive processes in choice and decision behavior (Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum 1980), pp. 117 et sqq., at. p. 141Google Scholar; Hogarth, Robin M. (ed.), New directions for methodology and social and behavioural science: Question framing and response consistency (San Francisco: Jossey-Bass 1982)Google Scholar; Kahneman, Daniel and Tversky, Amos, “Choices, Values and Frames”, in 39 American Psychologist (1984), pp. 341 et sqq., at p. 350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20 Mazur, Allan, “Bias in risk-benefit analysis”, 7 Technology in Society (1985), pp. 25 et sqq., at p. 30CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Fischhoff, Baruch, “Acceptable risk: A conceptual proposal”, 1 Risk: Health, Safety & Environment (1994), pp. 1 et sqq., at p. 28.Google Scholar
21 Laswell, Harold D., “The structure and function of communication in society”, in Bryson, Lyman (ed.), The Communication of Ideas: A Series of Addresses (New York: Cooper Square Publishers 1948), pp. 32 et sqq., at p. 35Google Scholar; Shannon, Claude E. and Weaver, Warren, The Mathematical Theory of Communication (Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press 1949).Google Scholar
22 Renn, Ortwin and Levine, Debra, “Credibility and trust in risk communication”, in Kasperson, Roger E. and Stallen, Pieter Jan M. (eds), Communicating Risk to the Public: International Perspectives (Amsterdam: Kluwer 1991), pp. 175 et sqq., at p.218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23 Fischhoff, Baruch, “Risk Perception and Communication Unplugged: Twenty Years of process”, supra note 15, at p. 142.Google Scholar
24 Lofstedt, “Risk Management in Post-Trust Societies”, supra note 5.
25 NRC, Improving Risk Communication, supra note 10; Renn, “Risk Governance: Coping with Uncertainty in a Complex World”, supra note 11.
26 OECD, “Guidance Document on Risk Communication for Chemical Risk Management”, 25 July 2002, available on the Internet at <http://www.olis.oecd.org/olis/2002doc.nsf/43bb6130e5e86e5fc12569fa005d004c/cb81407367ba51d5c1256c01003521ed/$FILE/JT00129938.PDF> (last accessed on 29 June 2010).
27 EUFIC, “An introduction to food risk communication”, April 2003, available on the Internet at <http://www.eufic.org/article/en/foodsafety-quality/risk-communication/expid/review-food-risk-communication> (last accessed on 29 June 2010).
28 ILGRA, “Risk Communication: A guide to Regulatory Practice”, 1998, available on the Internet at <http://www.hse.gov.uk/aboutus/ meetings/committees/ilgra/risk.pdf> (last accessed on 29 June 2010); RRAC, A Practical Guide to Public Risk Communication, the five essentials of good practice, May 2009, written and researched by Frederic Bouder, available on the Internet at <http://www.berr.gov.uk/files/file51458.pdf> (last accessed on 29 June 2010).
29 Cabinet Office, Risk: Improving Government's Capability to Handle Risk and Uncertainty (London: Strategy Unit Report 2002)Google Scholar; HM Treasury/Government Information and Communication Service (2003), “Communicating Risk” (available on the Internet at <http://www.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/media/132679/communicatingrisk.pdf>, last accessed on 29 June 2010).,+last+accessed+on+29+June+2010).>Google Scholar
30 FSA, “Signpost labelling, agenda item 5”, 9 March 2006, available on the Internet at <http://www.food.gov.uk/multimedia/pdfs/fsa060303.pdf> (last accessed on 29 June 2010)+(last+accessed+on+29+June+2010)>Google Scholar; FSA, “Front of Pack Nutritional Signpost Labelling Technical Guidance”, January 2007, Issue 1, available on the Internet at <http://www.food.gov.uk/multimedia/pdfs/frontofpackguidance.pdf> (last accessed on 29 June 2010)+(last+accessed+on+29+June+2010)>Google Scholar; HSE, “Improving health and Safety”, supra note 9.
31 RRAC, “A Practical Guide to Public Risk Communication, the five essentials of good practice”, supra note 28.
32 HSE, “Improving health and Safety”, supra note 9.
33 Pidgeon, Nick, Kasperson, Roger E. and Slovic, Paul (eds), The Social Amplification of Risk (New York: Cambridge University Press 2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar