Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T11:10:58.525Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

INTEGRATION OF RESEARCH AND THEORY IN THE PERSPECTIVE OF JOHN GOLDTHORPE

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 April 2005

DAVID D. LAITIN
Affiliation:
Stanford University [dlaitin@stanford.edu]
Get access

Extract

THIS REMARKABLE COLLECTION of (mostly reprinted) essays is first and foremost a defense of the statistically-based research program that has motivated Professor Goldthorpe's work through a distinguished career. In defending the statistical methodology that has become a standard in his corner of sociology, he also sets sharp limits to what can be contributed through qualitative methods. He then offers a challenge for future statistical analysts to address more directly that program's theoretical foundations. The dozen essays range widely in questions of methods and substance — in this review I provide no general summary but rather highlight a dual plea he makes to his profession: to marry macro statistical work to micro theory; and to press colleagues who engage in case study, historical, and ethnographic work to think more rigorously about what inferences can be correctly drawn from their low-n studies.

Type
NOTES CRITIQUES
Copyright
© 2004 Archives Européennes de Sociology

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

John H. GOLDTHORPE, On Sociology: Numbers, Narratives, and the Integration of Research and Theory (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2000, vi + 337 p.).