Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T07:15:26.380Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Wither Diversity of Post-Socialist Welfare Capitalist Cultures? Crisis and Change in Estonia and Slovenia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 April 2015

Nicole Lindstrom*
Affiliation:
University of York [nicole.lindstrom@york.ac.uk].
Get access

Abstract

The paper considers the impact of the current economic crisis on post-socialist welfare capitalist states through an examination of two most different cases: neo-liberal Estonia and neo-corporatist Slovenia. The crisis prompted the most sustained political contestation with respect to each model in two decades. Considering national public sphere discussions within a broader European context, the paper shows how transnational advocates of austerity reinforced Estonia’s neoliberal model but emboldened critics of the Slovenian model to roll back the state. While public sphere debates within small, peripheral states must be understood within transnational contexts, in both cases we can observe more continuity than change in the collective ideas underlying each model.

Résumé

Cet article étudie l’impact de la crise économique actuelle sur les Etats-providence post-socialistes à travers deux cas : l’Estonie néo-libérale et la Slovénie néo-corporatiste. La crise a entraîné au cours des deux dernières décennies une contestation politique intense de ces deux modèles. À partir de l’observation des débats nationaux dans la sphère publique considérés dans un contexte européen plus large, l’article montre de quelle manière les partisans internationaux de l’austérité ont renforcé le modèle néolibéral Estonien tout en stimulant la critique du modèle slovénien afin de faire reculer l’Etat. Si les débats dans la sphère publique propres aux petits Etats périphériques doivent être replacés dans un contexte transnational, on observe dans les deux cas davantage de continuité que de changement dans les idées collectives sous-jacentes à chaque modèle.

Zusammenfassung

Diese Untersuchung beschäftigt sich mit den Auswirkungen der gegenwärtigen Finanzkrise auf ehemalige sozialistische Staaten, die heute zu europäischen Wohlfahrtsstaaten zählen: das neoliberale Estland und das neo-korporatistische Slowenien. Die Krise hat im Laufe der letzten zwanzig Jahre zu einer heftigen politischen Kritik beider Modelle geführt. Gestützt auf die Beobachtung der öffentlichen, nationalen Debatten, unter Einbindung eines erweiterten europäischen Kontextes, beschreibt der Aufsatz, wie internationale Verteidiger der Sparpolitik das estländische, neoliberale Modell bekräftigt und gleichzeitig die Kritik am slowenischen Modell, mit Ziel des Staatsabbaus, hervorgerufen haben. Selbst wenn die öffentliche Debatte kleiner, peripherer Staaten in einen überstaatlichen Kontext eingebettet werden muss, kann man in beiden Fällen mehr Kontinuität als Wandel in den kollektiven Ideen eines jeden Modells beobachten.

Type
Economic Culture in the Public Sphere
Copyright
Copyright © A.E.S. 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Abdelal, Rawi, 2001. National Purpose in the World Economy: Post-Soviet States in Comparative Perspective (Ithaca, Cornell University Press).Google Scholar
Adam, Frane and Tomšič, Matevž, 2012. “The Dynamics of Elites and Type of Capitalism: Slovenian Exceptionalism?Historical Social Research, 37: 53-70.Google Scholar
Adam, Frane, Kristan, Primož and Tomšič, Matevž, 2009. “Varieties of Capitalism in Eastern Europe (with a Special Emphasis on Estonia and Slovenia)”, Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 36: 509-525.Google Scholar
Alexander, Jeffrey, 2006. The Civil Sphere (Oxford, Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Baltic Business News, 2009. “Estonian Industrial Production Fell most in EU”, 12 June.Google Scholar
The Baltic Course, 2009. “Trade unions to organize protest against Estonian government”, 26 May.Google Scholar
Baltic News Service, 2009a. “Estonia: Center Party Rally Passes without Incident”, 24 September.Google Scholar
Baltic News Service, 2009b. “Estonian Centrist Leader Flings Severe Criticism at Reform Party, Coalition”, 14 November.Google Scholar
Bandel, Nina, 2008. “Economic Objects as Cultural Objects: Discourse on Foreign Investment in Post-socialist Europe”, Socio-Economic Review, 6: 1-32.Google Scholar
Berman, Sheri, 2013Ideational Theorizing in the Social Science since Policy Paradigms, Social Learning, and the State”, Governance, 26: 217-237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bilefsky, Daniel, 2013. “Slovenia falls from economic grace, struggling to avert a bailout”, The New York Times, 5 May.Google Scholar
Blyth, Mark, 2013. Austerity: The History of a Dangerous Idea (Oxford, Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Bohle, Dorothee, 2014. “Post-Socialist Housing Meets Transnational Finance: Foreign Banks, Mortgage Lending, and the Privatization of Welfare in Hungary and Estonia”, Review of International Political Economy, 21: 913-948.Google Scholar
Bohle, Dorothee and Greskovits, Béla 2012. Capitalist Diversity on Europe’s Periphery. (Ithaca, Cornell University Press).Google Scholar
Brenner, Neil, Peck, Jamie and Theodore, Nik, 2010. “Variegated Neoliberalization: Geographies, Modalities, and Pathways”, Global Networks, 10: 182-222.Google Scholar
Bryant, Chris, 2011. “Slovenia rejects pension reform”, Financial Times, 5 June.Google Scholar
Buchen, Clemens, 2007. “Estonia and Slovenia as Antipodes”, in Lane, David and Myant, Martin, eds., Varieties of Capitalism in Post-Communist Countries (New York, Palgrave Macmillan: 165-183).Google Scholar
Cain, Phil, 2012. “Why Slovenia is content no more”, BBC News, 4 December.Google Scholar
Chwieroth, Jeffrey, 2010. “Shrinking the State: Neoliberal Economists and Social Spending in Latin America”, in Abdelal, Rawi, Blyth, Mark and Parsons, Craig, eds., Constructing the International Economy (Ithaca, Cornell University Press: 23-46).Google Scholar
Cox, Robert H., 2001. “The Social Construction of an Imperative: Why Welfare Reform Happened in Denmark and The Netherlands but Not Germany”, World Politics, 53: 463-498.Google Scholar
Crane, George T., 1998. “Economic Nationalism: Brining the Nation Back In”, Millennium, 27: 55-75.Google Scholar
Crowley, Stephen and Stanojević, Miroslav, 2011. “Varieties of Capitalism, Power Resources, and Historical Legacies: Explaining the Slovenian Exception”, Politics & Society, 39: 268-295.Google Scholar
Dougherty, Carter, 2008. “Estonia’s Let-It-Be Economy is Rattled by Worldwide Distress”, The New York Times, 10 October.Google Scholar
Epstein, Rachel, 2013. “Central and East European Bank Responses to the Financial ‘Crisis’: Do Domestic Banks Perform Better in a Crisis than their Foreign-Owned Counterparts?”, Europe-Asia Studies, 65: 528-547.Google Scholar
EURACTIV 2011. “Estonia’s Ruling Centre-Right Coalition Wins Election”, 7 March.Google Scholar
Feldmann, Magnus, 2007. “Emerging Varieties of Capitalism in Transition Countries: Industrial Relations and Wage Bargaining in Estonia and Slovenia”, Comparative Political Studies 29: 829-854.Google Scholar
Feldmann, Magnus, 2014. “Coalitions and Corporatism: the Slovenian Political Economy and the Crisis”, Government and Opposition, 49: 70-91.Google Scholar
Grabbe, Heather, 2003. “Europeanization Goes East: Power and Uncertainty in the EU Accession Process”, in Featherstone, Kevin and Radaelli, Claudio, eds., The Politics of Europeanization (Ithaca, Cornell University Press: 303-327).Google Scholar
Guardiancich, Igor, 2012. “The Uncertain Future of Slovenian Exceptionalism”, East European Politics and Societies, 26: 380-399.Google Scholar
Helleiner, Eric and Pickel, Andreas, 2005. Economic Nationalism in a Globalizing World. (Ithaca, Cornell University Press).Google Scholar
Hõbemägi, Toomas, 2010. “Jürgen Ligi: Estonia did not have a financial crisis”, Baltic Business News, 21 January.Google Scholar
Hugh, Edward, 2009. “Devaluation, Euro membership, and Loan Defaults: Some Thoughts for my Critics”, Baltic Economy Watch. 12 March. http://balticeconomy.blogspot.com/2009/03/devaluation-euro-membership-and-loan.html.Google Scholar
International Monetary Fund (IMF), 2013. “Slovenia 2013 Staff Visit: Concluding Statement of the Mission”, http: www.imf.org/external/np/ms/2013/031813d.htm, date accessed 9 May 2013.Google Scholar
Jansen, Sue Curry, 2008. “Designer Nations: Neo-liberal Nation Branding – Brand Estonia”, Social Identities, 14: 121-142.Google Scholar
Kattel, Rainer and Raudla, Ringa, 2013. “The Baltic Republics and the Crisis of 2008-2011”, Europe-Asia Studies, 65: 426-449.Google Scholar
Keating, Joshua, 2012. “President of Estonia Goes Ballistic on Paul Krugman”, Foreign Policy Passport blog, 6 June.Google Scholar
KOKS, et. al. (2013) “Slovenians Demand Radical Change”, http://criticallegalthinking.com/2013/01/15/slovenians-demand-radical-change/, date accessed 18 January.Google Scholar
Krugman, Paul, 2012. “Estonian Rhapsody”, “The Conscience of a Liberal” The New York Times blog, 6 June.Google Scholar
Lindstrom, Nicole and Piroska, Dóra, 2007. “The Politics of Privatization and Europeanization in Europe’s Periphery: Slovenian Banks and Breweries on Sale”, Competition and Change, 11: 117-135.Google Scholar
Lindstrom, Nicole 2015. The Politics of Europeanization and Post-socialist Transformations (Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan).Google Scholar
Lütz, Susanne and Kranke, Matthew, 2013. “The European Rescue of the Washington Consensus? EU and IMF lending to Central and East European Countries”, Review of International Political Economy, 21: 310-338.Google Scholar
Myant, Martin and Drahokoupil, Jan, 2012. “International Integration, Varieties of Capitalism and Resilience to Crisis in Transition Economies”, Europe-Asia Studies, 64: 1-33.Google Scholar
Nölke, Andreas and Vliegenhart, Arjan, 2009. “Enlarging the Varieties of Capitalism: The Emergence of Dependent Market Economies in East Central Europe”, World Politics, 61: 670-702.Google Scholar
Novak, Maria, 2014. “Davos Interview: Slovenian PM Poll-Leader Wants to Reconsider Some Privatizations”, Reuters, 2 July.Google Scholar
OECD, 2013. “OECD Economic Surveys: Slovenia”, http://www.oecd.org/eco/surveys/Overview_Slovenia.pdf.Google Scholar
Offe, Claus, 1991. “Capitalism by Democratic Design? Democratic Theory Facing the Triple Transition in East Central Europe”, Social Research, 58: 865-892.Google Scholar
Parts, Johan and Blair, Tony, 2003. “The Enlarged EU Must be Free to Compete”, Financial Times, 3 November.Google Scholar
Peck, Jamie, Theodore, Nik and Brenner, Neil, 2009. “Postneoliberalism and its Malcontents”, Antipode, 41: 94-116.Google Scholar
Pierson, Paul, 1998. “Irresistible Forces, Immovable Objects: Post-Industrial Welfare States Confront Permanent Austerity”, Journal of European Public Policy, 5: 539-560.Google Scholar
Proos, Peeter, 2010. “Estonia’s euro opponent: Estonia is getting the last ticket for the Titanic”, Press release, 30 December. Available at: www.teameurope.info/node/791.Google Scholar
Razsa, Maple and Kurnik, Andrej, 2012. “The Occupy Movement in Žižek’s Hometown: Direct Democracy and a Politics of Becoming”, American Ethnologist, 39: 238-258.Google Scholar
TV Slovenia 1, 2005. Television broadcast, 17 January.Google Scholar
Ruggie, John G., 1982. “International Regimes, Transactions, and Change: Embedded Liberalism in the Post-War Economic Order, International Organization, 36: 379-415.Google Scholar
Scharpf, Fritz, 2002. “The European Social Model: Coping with the Challenges of Diversity”, Journal of Common Market Studies, 40: 645-670.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Vivien, 2010. “Taking Ideas and Discourse Seriously: Explaining Change through Discursive Institutionalism as the Fourth ‘New Instititutionalism’”, European Political Science Review, 2: 1-25.Google Scholar
Slovenian Council, 2013. “An Open Letter by the Slovenian Council for the Republic to Institutions in Europe and the World”, email, date accessed 22 January.Google Scholar
Slovenian Press Agency, 2010. “Daily says economic crisis saved Slovenia from Sot”, 13 March.Google Scholar
Sommers, Jeffrey and Woolson, Charles, eds., 2014. The Contradictions of Austerity: The Socio-Economic Costs of the Neoliberal Baltic Model (London, Routledge).Google Scholar
Sovdat, Petra and Urbas, Uros, 2010. “Intervju – Borut Pahor: Lani je Slovenijo tresla kriza, zdaj jo bodo reforme” [Last year Slovenia was shaking from crisis, now reforms are coming], Finance, 17 May.Google Scholar
Stanojević, Miroslav and Klarič, Matei, 2013. “The Impact of Socio-Economic Shocks on Social Dialogue in Slovenia”, Transfer, 19: 217-226.Google Scholar
Statistical Office of the Republic of Slovenia, 2014. Accessed at: https://www.stat.si/eng/indikatorji.asp?ID=12.Google Scholar
Štor, Barbara, 2010. “Exit Strategy: Light at the End of the Tunnel?” Slovenian Times, 5 March.Google Scholar
Streeck, Wolfgang, 2011. “The Crisis of Democratic Capitalism”, New Left Review, 71: 5-29.Google Scholar
Tere, Juhan, 2009. “Edgar Savisaar: None of Ansip’s Forecasts or Promises Come True”, The Baltic Course, 22 May.Google Scholar
Tere, Juhan, 2010. “EU’s Least Indebted State Estonia is Model for Euro After Greek Crisis”, The Baltic Course, 11 May.Google Scholar
The Baltic Course, 2009. “Trade Unions to Organize Protest against Estonian Government”, 26 May.Google Scholar
Thorhallsson, Baldur and Kattel, Rainer, 2013. “Neo-Liberal Small States and Economic Crisis: Lessons for Democratic Corporatism”, Journal of Baltic Studies, 44: 83-103.Google Scholar
Vičič, Denis, 2014. “Janša resnično noče, da bi bila Bratušek evropska komisarka” [Janša really does not want Bratušek to be a European Commissioner], Mladina, 1 September.Google Scholar
Žižek, Slavoj, 2013. “The West’s crisis is one of democracy as much as finance”, The Guardian, 16 January.Google Scholar