Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-d8cs5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-31T01:37:00.572Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Strickland v. Rocla Concrete Pipes Ltd and Others

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 January 2025

P. A. McNamara
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Case Notes
Information
Federal Law Review , Volume 5 , Issue 1 , March 1972 , pp. 133 - 143
Copyright
Copyright © 1972 The Australian National University

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 (1971) 45 A.L.J.R. 485; [1972] A.L.R. 3. High Court of Australia; Barwick CJ., McTiernan, Menzies, Windeyer, Owen, Walsh and Gibbs JJ.

2 (1909) 8 C.L.R. 330.

3 45 A.L.J.R. 485, 489, 494, 498, 499, 500, 504.

4 Amalgamated Society of Engineers v. Adelaide Steamship Co. Ltd (1920-) 28 C.L.R. 129.

5 45 A.L.J.R. 485, 490, 499, 500, 504.

6 Id.,494.

7 Id., 490.

8 Ibid.

9 This argument was rejected in Bank of New South Wales v. The Common–wealth ( 1948 ) 76 C.L.R. 1, 204 per Latham C.J., 256 per Rich and Williams JJ.

10 Supra p. 136.

11 The Owners of S.S. Kalibia v. Alexander Wilson (1910) 11 C.L.R. 689.

12 For discussion of s. 15A, see The King v. Poole; Ex parte Henry (No. 2): (1939) 61 C.L.R. 634, 652 per Dixon J.; example of operation of s. 15A, set Huddart Parker Ltd and Others v. The Commonwealth (1931) 44 C.L.R. 492 512-513.

13 45 A.LJ.R. 485, 492, 497, 499, 500-501. Gibbs J. (at 505) held that the Trade Practices Act s. 7 together with the Acts Interpretation Act s. 15A could save the Act, but did not decide that s. 15A alone could have preserved the Act.

14 Wah.h J. (at 503) expressly left open the question whether the Act could have a valid abbreviated operation by restrictive reference to Constitutions, 51(i.) in an appropriate case.

15 Pidoto v. The State of Victoria (1943) 68 C.L.R. 87.

16 45 A.L.J.R. 485, 495.

17 Id., 493, 495, 499, 500, 503.

18 Id., 492-494.

19 (1943) 68 C.L.R. 87.

20 McTieman J. dissented on this point.

21 (1943) 68 C.LR. 87, 110-11l.

22 ld., 108-109.

23 45 A.L.J.R. 485, 505.

24 Id., 495.

25 (1943) 68 C.L.:?.. 87.

26 45 A.L.J.R. 485, 494, 500.

27 Id., 503.

28 Id., 486, 494, 500, 503.

29 Id., 494 (McTieman J.).

30 Id., 499-500 (Windeyer and Owen JJ.).

31 S.4.

32 s.5.

33 s.66.

34 Herald and Weekly Times Ltd v. The Commonwealth (1966) 115 C.L.R. 418.

35 45 A.L.J,R. 485, 490 per Barwick C.J.; Moorehead's case (1909) 8 C.L.R.330, 412-413 per Higgins J.

36 (1909) C.L.R. 330, 348, per Griffith C.J.

36 (1909) C.L.R. 330, 348, per Griffith C.J.

37 Id.,348 per Griffith C.J., 362 per Barton J., 371 per O'Connor J., 394per Isaacs J., 412 per Higgins J.; Bank Nationalization case (1948) 76 C.L.R. 1. 202 per Latham C.J., 304 per Starke J.

38 Moorehead's case ( 1909) 8 C.L.R. 330, 393 per Isaacs J.

39 fd.. 394 per Isaacs J.

40 Bank Nationalization case (1948) 76 C.L.R. 1,204,256.

41 (1909) 8 C.L.R. 330, 393.

42 Cf., Bank Nationalization case (1948) 76 C.L.R. 1, 304 per Starke J.