We show that Cannon–Thurston maps exist for degenerate free groups without parabolics, that is, for handlebody groups. Combining these techniques with earlier work proving the existence of Cannon–Thurston maps for surface groups, we show that Cannon–Thurston maps exist for arbitrary finitely generated Kleinian groups without parabolics, proving conjectures of Thurston and McMullen. We also show that point pre-images under Cannon–Thurston maps for degenerate free groups without parabolics correspond to endpoints of leaves of an ending lamination in the Masur domain, whenever a point has more than one pre-image. This proves a conjecture of Otal. We also prove a similar result for point pre-images under Cannon–Thurston maps for arbitrary finitely generated Kleinian groups without parabolics.

This article describes a formal proof of the Kepler conjecture on dense sphere packings in a combination of the HOL Light and Isabelle proof assistants. This paper constitutes the official published account of the now completed Flyspeck project.

We address a unification of the Schubert calculus problems solved by Buch [A Littlewood–Richardson rule for the K$K$-theory of Grassmannians, Acta Math. 189 (2002), 37–78] and Knutson and Tao [Puzzles and (equivariant) cohomology of Grassmannians, Duke Math. J.119(2) (2003), 221–260]. That is, we prove a combinatorial rule for the structure coefficients in the torus-equivariant K$K$-theory of Grassmannians with respect to the basis of Schubert structure sheaves. This rule is positive in the sense of Anderson et al. [Positivity and Kleiman transversality in equivariant K$K$-theory of homogeneous spaces, J. Eur. Math. Soc.13 (2011), 57–84] and in a stronger form. Our work is based on the combinatorics of genomic tableaux and a generalization of Schützenberger’s [Combinatoire et représentation du groupe symétrique, in Actes Table Ronde CNRS, Univ. Louis-Pasteur Strasbourg, Strasbourg, 1976, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, 579 (Springer, Berlin, 1977), 59–113] jeu de taquin. Using our rule, we deduce the two other combinatorial rules for these coefficients. The first is a conjecture of Thomas and Yong [Equivariant Schubert calculus and jeu de taquin, Ann. Inst. Fourier (Grenoble) (2013), to appear]. The second (found in a sequel to this paper) is a puzzle rule, resolving a conjecture of Knutson and Vakil from 2005.

Conformal loop ensembles (CLEs) are random collections of loops in a simply connected domain, whose laws are characterized by a natural conformal invariance property. The set of points not surrounded by any loop is a canonical random connected fractal set — a random and conformally invariant analog of the Sierpinski carpet or gasket.

In the present paper, we derive a direct relationship between the CLEs with simple loops (\text{CLE}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D705}}$\text{CLE}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D705}}$ for \unicode[STIX]{x1D705}\in (8/3,4)$\unicode[STIX]{x1D705}\in (8/3,4)$, whose loops are Schramm’s \text{SLE}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D705}}$\text{SLE}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D705}}$-type curves) and the corresponding CLEs with nonsimple loops (\text{CLE}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D705}^{\prime }}$\text{CLE}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D705}^{\prime }}$ with \unicode[STIX]{x1D705}^{\prime }:=16/\unicode[STIX]{x1D705}\in (4,6)$\unicode[STIX]{x1D705}^{\prime }:=16/\unicode[STIX]{x1D705}\in (4,6)$, whose loops are \text{SLE}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D705}^{\prime }}$\text{SLE}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D705}^{\prime }}$-type curves). This correspondence is the continuum analog of the Edwards–Sokal coupling between the q$q$-state Potts model and the associated FK random cluster model, and its generalization to noninteger q$q$.

Like its discrete analog, our continuum correspondence has two directions. First, we show that for each \unicode[STIX]{x1D705}\in (8/3,4)$\unicode[STIX]{x1D705}\in (8/3,4)$, one can construct a variant of \text{CLE}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D705}}$\text{CLE}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D705}}$ as follows: start with an instance of \text{CLE}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D705}^{\prime }}$\text{CLE}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D705}^{\prime }}$, then use a biased coin to independently color each \text{CLE}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D705}^{\prime }}$\text{CLE}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D705}^{\prime }}$ loop in one of two colors, and then consider the outer boundaries of the clusters of loops of a given color. Second, we show how to interpret \text{CLE}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D705}^{\prime }}$\text{CLE}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D705}^{\prime }}$ loops as interfaces of a continuum analog of critical Bernoulli percolation within \text{CLE}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D705}}$\text{CLE}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D705}}$ carpets — this is the first construction of continuum percolation on a fractal planar domain. It extends and generalizes the continuum percolation on open domains defined by \text{SLE}_{6}$\text{SLE}_{6}$ and \text{CLE}_{6}$\text{CLE}_{6}$.

These constructions allow us to prove several conjectures made by the second author and provide new and perhaps surprising interpretations of the relationship between CLEs and the Gaussian free field. Along the way, we obtain new results about generalized \text{SLE}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D705}}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D70C})$\text{SLE}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D705}}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D70C})$ curves for \unicode[STIX]{x1D70C}<-2$\unicode[STIX]{x1D70C}<-2$, such as their decomposition into collections of \text{SLE}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D705}}$\text{SLE}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D705}}$-type ‘loops’ hanging off of \text{SLE}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D705}^{\prime }}$\text{SLE}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D705}^{\prime }}$-type ‘trunks’, and vice versa (exchanging \unicode[STIX]{x1D705}$\unicode[STIX]{x1D705}$ and \unicode[STIX]{x1D705}^{\prime }$\unicode[STIX]{x1D705}^{\prime }$). We also define a continuous family of natural \text{CLE}$\text{CLE}$ variants called boundary conformal loop ensembles (BCLEs) that share some (but not all) of the conformal symmetries that characterize \text{CLE}$\text{CLE}$s, and that should be scaling limits of critical models with special boundary conditions. We extend the \text{CLE}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D705}}$\text{CLE}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D705}}$/\text{CLE}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D705}^{\prime }}$\text{CLE}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D705}^{\prime }}$ correspondence to a \text{BCLE}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D705}}$\text{BCLE}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D705}}$/\text{BCLE}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D705}^{\prime }}$\text{BCLE}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D705}^{\prime }}$ correspondence that makes sense for the wider range \unicode[STIX]{x1D705}\in (2,4]$\unicode[STIX]{x1D705}\in (2,4]$ and \unicode[STIX]{x1D705}^{\prime }\in [4,8)$\unicode[STIX]{x1D705}^{\prime }\in [4,8)$.