Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
 

In the first installment of the Horizons anniversary collection, our anniversary roundtable features Raymond E. Brown’s article from Horizons 1.1 (1974), “‘Who Do Men Say that I Am?’—Modern Scholarship on Gospel Christology.” Pheme Perkins, Boston College, and Gilberto A. Ruiz, Saint Anselm College, respond. 

Perkins and Ruiz offer probing and appreciative perspectives on Brown’s insights that also challenge biblical scholars and theologians to a renewed cooperation in a twenty-first-century key. We hope that a refreshed reading of Brown with the assistance of Perkins and Ruiz will inspire our readers to continue the conversation. Additionally, founding coeditor Rodger Van Allen provides insights on the naming and founding of Horizons as a preface to reprinting his 1999 account of the origins of the journal. The current editors believe it is important to highlight our “origin story” for a new generation of readers and contributors.

 
 

In celebration of this milestone, past editors, contributors and readers were invited to share their tributes to Horizons, their experience with the journal and its history, including: 

Bill Portier, University of Dayton
Bradford E. Hinze, Karl Rahner, S.J., Professor of Theology, Fordham University
Timothy Matovina, University of Notre Dame
Michele Saracino, Manattan College
Paul Lakeland, Fairfield University
John E. Thiel, Fairfield University
Roger Haight, S.J., Union Theological Seminary
Nancy Pineda-Madrid, T. Marie Chilton Chair of Catholic Theology, Loyola Marymount University
Elizabeth Johnson, Distinguished Professor Emerita, Fordham University
Julie Hanlon Rubio, Shea-Heusaman Professor of Christian Social Ethics, Jesuit School of Theology of Santa Clara University

 
 

Our anniversary roundtable for the second installment of the Horizons anniversary collection features Gustavo Gutiérrez’s “Faith as Freedom: Solidarity with the Alienated and Confidence in the Future," from Horizons 2.1 (1975). Professor Emeritus Roberto Goizueta, Boston College, and Professor Neomi De Anda, University of Dayton, respond. 

Goizueta and De Anda offer us a fresh reading of Gutiérrez’s 1975 article, including putting it in context alongside later developments in his work and leveling challenges concerning some shortcomings. Their analyses inspire readers to a renewed commitment to the praxis of a faith that liberates and to “hope against hope,” as Gutiérrez reminded us at the end of his article.