Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T15:02:07.496Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Toxicity of l-menthol and its derivatives against four storage insects

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 September 2011

K.K. Aggarwal
Affiliation:
Chemical Engineering Division
A.K. Tripathi
Affiliation:
Bioprospection Group, Genetic Resources and Biotechnology Division, Central Institute of Medicinal and Aromatic Plants, P.O. CIMAP Lucknow-226015, India
Ateeque Ahmad
Affiliation:
Chemical Engineering Division
Veena Prajapati
Affiliation:
Bioprospection Group, Genetic Resources and Biotechnology Division, Central Institute of Medicinal and Aromatic Plants, P.O. CIMAP Lucknow-226015, India
Neetu Verma
Affiliation:
Bioprospection Group, Genetic Resources and Biotechnology Division, Central Institute of Medicinal and Aromatic Plants, P.O. CIMAP Lucknow-226015, India
Sushil Kumar
Affiliation:
Bioprospection Group, Genetic Resources and Biotechnology Division, Central Institute of Medicinal and Aromatic Plants, P.O. CIMAP Lucknow-226015, India
Get access

Abstract

l-menthol isolated from the essential oil of Mentha arvensis and seven of its acyl derivatives were tested for contact and vapour toxicity, and ovicidal and repellent activity against the storage pests Callosobruchus maculatus F., Rhyzopertha dominica F., Sitophilus oryzae L. and Tribolium castaneum Herbst. Menthyl propionate and l-menthol were highly toxic in contact assays and vapour toxicity assays respectively. l-menthol was also found to be strongly repellent (82–100% at 0.353 μg/cm2 dose) against all the insects, while menthyl acetate was highly ovicidal against T. castaneum.

Résumé

Le l-menthol isolé de l'huile essentielle de Mentha arvensis et sept de ses dérivés acétylés ont été testés pour leur toxicité de contact et fumigène et leur activité ovicide et répulsive vis à vis des ravageurs des stocks Callosobruchus maculatus F., Rhyzopertha dominica F., Sitophilus oryzae L. et Tribolium castaneum Herbst. Le propionate de menthyl et le l-menthol ont été hautement toxiques lors des essais par contact et par fumigation. Le l-menthol a été également fortement répulsif (82–100% à la dose de 0,353 mg/cm2) contre tous les insectes, alors que l'acétate de menthyl a été hautement ovicide contre T. castaneum.

Type
Research Articles
Copyright
Copyright © ICIPE 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbott, W. S. (1925) A method of computing the effectiveness of an insecticide, J. Econ. Entomol. 18, 265267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aggarwal, K. K. (1998) Introduction of methol production technology in India. PAFAI J. 20, 3337.Google Scholar
Ahmad, A., Aggarwal, K. K., Srivastava, S. K., Ahmad, J. and Kumar, Sushil (2000) Carbon-13 and proton NMR shift assignments and physical constants of some l-menthol derivatives, J. Essen. Oil Res. 12, 775780.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banthrope, D. V. (1991) Classification of terpenoids and general procedures for their characterization, pp. 10411054. In Methods in Plant Biochemistry Vol. 7. Terpenoids (Edited by Charlwood, B.V. and Banthrope, D.V.). Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
Brattsten, L. B. (1983) Cytochrome P-450 involvement in the interaction between plant terpenes and insect herbivores, pp. 173195. In Plant Resistance to Insects (Edited by Hedin, P. A.). American Chemical Society, Washington.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charlwood, B. V. and Charlwood, K. A. (1991) Monoterpenoids, pp. 4398. In Methods in Plant Biochemistry Vol. 7. Terpenoids (Edited by Charlwood, B.V. and Banthrope, D.V.). Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
Croteau, R. (1980) The biosynthesis of terpene compounds, pp. 1333. In Fragrance and Flavor Substances (Edited by Croteau, R.). Haarman & Reimer, Pattensen, Germany.Google Scholar
Ellis, M. D. and Baxendale, F. P. (1997) Toxicity of seven monoterpenoids to tracheal mites (Acari: Tarsonemidae) and their honey bee (Hymenoptera: Apidae) hosts when applied as fumigante, J. Econ. Entomol. 90, 10871091.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finney, D. J. (1971) Probit Analysis, 3rd edn.Cambridge University Press, London.Google Scholar
Harwood, S. H., Moldenke, A. F. and Berry, R. E. (1990) Toxicity of peppermint monoterpenes to the variegated cutworm (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). J. Econ. Entomol. 83, 17611767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, Y., Tan, J. M. W. L., Kini, R. M. and Ho, S. H. (1997) Toxic and antifeedant action of nutmeg oil against Tribolium castaneum (Herbst) and Sitophilus zeamais Motsch. J. Stored Prod. Res. 33, 289298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ikawa, M., Mosley, S. P. and Barbero, L. J. (1992) Inhibitory effects of terpenealcohals and aldehydes on growth of green alga, Chlorella pyrenoidosa. J. Chem. Ecol. 18, 17551759.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karr, L. L. and Coats, J. R. (1992) Effects of four monoterpenoids on growth and reproduction of German cockroach (Blattodea: Blattellidae). J. Econ. Entomol. 85, 420424.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kloeke, J. A., Darlington, M. V. and Balandrin, M. F. (1987) 1,8-Cineole (eucalyptol), a mosquito feeding and ovipositional repellent from volatile oil of Hemizonia fitchii (Asteraceae). J. Chem. Ecol. 13, 21312141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, S., Tsao, R., Peterson, C. and Coats, J. R. (1997) Insecticidal activity of monoterpenoids to the western corn rootworm (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae), two-spotted spider mite (Acari: Tetranychidae) and house fly (Diptera: Muscidae). J. Econ. Entomol. 90, 883892.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mathella, C. S., Shah, G. C., Melkani, A. B. and Pant, A. K. (1989) Terpenoids of Mentha longifolia subsp. liimalaiensis. Fitoterpia 60, 349350.Google Scholar
Me Donald, L. L., Guy, R. H. and Speirs, R. D. (1970) Preliminary evaluation of new candidate materials as toxicants, repellents and attractants against stored product insects –1. Marketing Research Report No. 882. Agricultural Research Service, US Department of Agriculture, Washington DC. 8 pp.Google Scholar
Mishra, R. C. and Kumar, J. (1983) Evaluation of Mentha piperita Linn, as fumigant against the red flour beetle, Tribolium castaneum (Herbst). Indian Perf. 27, 7376.Google Scholar
Rice, P. J. and Coats, J. R. (1994) Insecticidal properties of several monoterpenoids to the house fly (Diptera: Muscidae), red flour beetle (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae) and Southern corn rootworm (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). J. Econ. Entomol. 87, 11721179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Regnault-Roger, C. (1999) Diversification of plant protection strategies: Use of monoterpenes. Acta Botanica Gallica 14, 3541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodriguez, E. and Levin, D. H. (1975) Biochemical parallelism of repellents and attractants in higher plants and arthropods, pp. 215270. In Recent Advances in Phytochemistry: Biochemical Interaction between Plants and Insects (Edited by Wallace, J. M. and Mansell, R. L.). Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar
SAS Institute (1988) SAS/STAT User's Guide, Statistics, version 6.03. SAS Institute, Cary, NC.Google Scholar
SPSS (1999) SPSS for Windows, version 9.01. SPSS. Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
Tripathi, A. K., Prajapati, V., Aggarwal, K. K. and Kumar, S. (2000) Effect of volatile oil constituents of Mentha species against the stored pests Callosobruchus maculatus and Tribolium castaneum. J. Med. Arom. Plant Sci. 22/1B, 549556.Google Scholar
Tsao, R., Lee, S., Rice, P. J., Jensen, C. and Coats, J. R. (1995) Monoterpenoids and their synthetic derivatives as leads for new insect control agents, pp. 312324. In Synthesis and Chemistry of Agrochemicals IV (Edited by Baker, D. R., Fenyes, J. G., and Basarab, G. S.). American Chemical Society, Washington DC.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watanabe, K., Umeda, K., Kurita, Y., Takayama, C. and Miyakado, M. (1990) Two insecticidal monoterpenes, telfairine and aplysiaterpenoid A, from the red alga, Plocamium telfairiae: Structure elucidation, biological activity and molecular topographical consideration by a semiempiricaí molecular orbital study. Pestio. Biochem. Physiol. 37, 275286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watanabe, K. Y., Shono, A., Kakimizu, A., Okada, N., Matsuo, A.S. and Nishimura, H. (1993) New mosquito repellent from Eucalyptus camaldulensis. J. Agric. Food Chem. 41, 21642166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar