Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T03:59:20.024Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Distribution of the sensillae of the red palm weevil, Rhynchophorus Ferrugineus (Oliv.) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 September 2011

H. S. Salama  and
Shadia E. Abdel Aziz
H. S. Salama*
Affiliation:
Plant Protection Department, National Research Centre, Dokki, Cairo, Egypt
Shadia E. Abdel Aziz
Affiliation:
Plant Protection Department, National Research Centre, Dokki, Cairo, Egypt
*
Corresponding author: HSS. E-mail: Hussedinsalama36@hotmail.com
Get access

Abstract

The distribution of the types of sensillae in the adult red palm weevil, Rhynchophorus ferrugineus (Oliv.) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), was studied using scanning electron microscopy. Five types of sensillae can be identified on the antenna, with no apparent differences between sexes. These are: multiporous peg sensillae, sensillae trichoïdea (I and II); sensillae basiconica (type I, II and III) and sensillae styloconica. The distal segment of the maxillary palp bears 22 sensillae basiconica in the female, 13 in the male.The upper and lower incisor cusps of the mandibles of the male are relatively longer and more rounded, with an angle of 45° or more where the inner margins of the cusps meet. In the female, the upper and lower cusps are slightly shorter, with an angle of about 45°. In the buccal cavity of females, groups of finger-like sensillae basiconica of various length and shape project toward the centre of the oral opening. In the male, multiporous peg sensillae are found. Sensillae trichoidea are present on the ventral and dorsal sides of the first, second and third tarsal segments distally. These are much denser on the male than the female. On the terminal (9th) abdominal segment of the ovipositor, sensillae are distributed on the dorsal plate, medial plate, ventral plate and anal leaflets (paired). Sensillae of four types occur on the anal leaflets.

Résumé

La distribution des différents types de sensilles chez l'adulte du charançon rouge du palmier, Rhyncophorus ferrugineus, a été étudiée à l'aide du microscope électronique à balayage. Quatre types de sensilles peuvent être indentifiés sur l'antenne, sans différence apparente selon le sexe. Ce sont: des sensilles chaetica, des sensilles trichoïdes (type I et II); des sensilles basiconiques (type I, II et III) et des sensilles styloconiques. L'article distal du palpe maxillaire porte 22 sensilles basiconiques chez la femelle et 13 chez le mâle. Les parties supérieures et inférieures des extrémités incisives des mandibules du mâle sont relativement longues et plus arrondies, avec un angle de 45° et plus, lorsque les bords internes des extrémités se rejoignent. Chez la femelle, les parties supérieures et inférieures des extrémités sont lègèrement plus courtes, avec un angle d'environ 45°. Dans la cavité buccale des femelles, des groupes de sensilles basiconiques digitées de tailles et de formes variables se dressent vers le centre de la bouche. Chez le mâle, on trouve des sensilles chaetica. Des sensilles trichoïdes sont présentes sur les parties ventrales et dorsales du premier, deuxième et troisième articles des tarses en position distale. Leur densité est plus importante chez le mâle que chez la femelle. Sur le dernier (9ème) segment abdominal correspondant à l'ovipositeur, les sensilles sont distribuées sur le sclérite dorsal, le sclerite latéral, le sclérite ventral et les paramères. Des sensilles des quatre types sont prèsentes sur les paramères.

Keywords

red palm weevilRhynchophorus ferrugineussensillaescanning electron microscopyColeopteraCurculionidaecharançon rouge du palmierRhyncophorus ferrugineussensillemicroscopie électronique à balayageColeopteraCurculionidae
Type
Research Articles
Information
International Journal of Tropical Insect Science , Volume 21 , Issue 2 , June 2001 , pp. 179 - 188
Copyright
Copyright © ICIPE 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Albert, P. J. (1980) Morphology and innervation of the mouth-part sensillae in the larvae of the spruce budworm, Choristoneura fiimiferana (Clem.) (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Can. J. Zool. 58, 842–851.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bland, R. G. (1981) Antennal sensillae of the adult alfalfa weevil, Hypera postica (Gyllenhal)(Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Int. J. Insect Morphol. Embryol. 10, 265–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bland, R. G. (1984) Mouth part sensillae and mandibles of the adult alfalfa weevil, Hypera postica and the Egyptian alfalfa weevil, H. brunneipennis (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 77, 720–724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boeckh, J. (1962) Elektrophysiologische untersuchungen an einzelnem Geruchsrezeptoren auf der Antenne des Totengräbers (Necrophorus). Z. Vergleich. Physiol 46, 212–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chadha, G. K. and Roome, R.E. (1980) Oviposition behaviour and the sensillae of the ovipositor of Chilo partellus and Spodoptera littoralis (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). J. Zool. 192, 169–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dennell, R. (1942) The structure and function of the mouth parts, rostrum and fore-gut of the weevil, Calandra granaria L. Phil. Trans. London 231, 247–291.Google Scholar
Dethier, V. G. and Kuch, J. H. (1971) Electrophysiological studies of gustation in lepidopterous larvae. 1. Comparative sensitivity to sugars, amino acids and glycosides. Z. Vergi Physiol. 72, 343–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
El-Sayed, M. T. (1940) On the morphology, anatomy and biology of Araecerus fasciculatus De Geer (Coleoptera: Anthritidae). Bull. Soc. Fouad 1er d'Ent. 24, 82–152.Google Scholar
El-Sharaby, A. M., Salama, H. S. and Abd El-Aziz, S. E. (1980) Gustation and olfaction in lepidopterous insects. Ann. Agric. Sci., Moshtohor 13, 177–187.Google Scholar
Fenemore, P.G. (1978) Oviposition of the potato tuber moth Phthorimaea operculella Zell. (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae); the physical nature of the oviposition substrate. N.Z.J. Zool. 5, 591–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fenemore, P. G. (1980) Oviposition of the potato tuber moth Phthorimaea operculella Zell. (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae); identification of host-plant factors influencing oviposition response. N.Z.J. Zool. 7, 435–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grula, J. W. and Taylor, O. R. (1980) A micromorphological and experimental study of the antennae of the sulfur butterflies, Colias eurythene and C. philodice (Lepidoptera: Pieridae). J. Kans. Entomol. Soc. 53, 476–484.Google Scholar
Harbach, R. E. and Larsen, J. R. (1977) Fine structure of antennal sensillae of the adult mealworm beetle, Tenebrio molitor L. (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae). Int. J. Insect Morphol. Embryol. 6, 41–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hatfield, L. D., Frazier, J. L. and Coons, L. B. (1976) Antennal sensillae of pecan weevil, Curculio caryae (Horn.)(Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Int. J. Insect Morphol. Embryol 5, 279–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ishikawa, S. (1963) Response of maxillary chemoreceptors in the larvae of the silkworm, Bombyx mori to stimulation by carbohydrates. J. Cellular Comp. Physiol. 61, 99–107.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ishikawa, S. (1966) Electrical response and function of a bitter substance receptor associated with the maxillary sensillae of the larvae of the silkworm, Bombyx mori L. J. Cellular Comp. Physiol. 67, 1–12.Google Scholar
Kapoor, N.N. (1985) External morphology and distribution of the antennal sensillae of the stone fly, Paragnetina media (Walker) (Plecoptera: Perlidae). Int. J. Insect Morphol. Embryol. 14, 273–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luis Valencia, H. and Rice, M. J. (1982) Contact chemoreceptors on the ovipositor of the potato moth, Phthorimaea operculella Zell. (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae). Int. J. Insect Morphol. Embryol. 11, 121–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayer, M. S., Mankin, R. W. and Carlysle, T. C. (1981) External antennal morphometry of Trichoplusia ni (Hubner)(Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Int. J. Insect Morphol. Embryol. 10, 185–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mclver, S. B. (1974) Fine structure of antennal grooved pegs of the mosquito, Aedes aegypti. Cell. Tissue Res. 153, 327–337.Google Scholar
Mclver, S. B. (1975) Structure of cuticular mechanoreceptors of arthropods. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 20, 381–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mclver, S.B. and Siemicki, R. (1976) Fine structure of the antennal tip of the crabhole mosquito, Deinocentes cancer Theobald (Diptera: Culicidae). Int. J. Insect Morphol. Embryol 5, 319–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salama, H. S. (1984) Gustation in the moth, Spodoptera littoralis. Zool. J. Physiol 88, 165–178.Google Scholar
Salama, H. S., Sharaby, A., Abd El-Aziz, S. E., Shaarawy, F. and Azmy, N. (1987) Ultrastructure of chemoreceptors in the moth of the American boliworm, Heliothis armigera and their response to chemicals. Bull. Ent. Soc. Egypt., Econ. Ser. 16, 237–263.Google Scholar
Saxena, K. N. (1958) Location of the olfactory receptors of the blowfly, Phormia regina Meigen. Proc. Nat. Insect Sci. india (B) 24, 125–132.Google Scholar
Schoonhoven, L.M. and Dethier, V.G. (1966) Sensory aspects of host plant discrimination by lepidopterous larvae. Arch. Neerl. Zool 16, 497–530.Google Scholar
Schwartzkopff, J. (1974) Mechanoreception, pp. 273–352. In The Physiology of Insecta (Edited by M., Rockstein Vol. 2, 2nd ed.). Academic Press, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slifer, E. H. (1970) The structure of arthropod chemoreceptors. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 15, 121–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, C. M., Frazier, J. L., Coons, L. B. and Knight, W. E. (1976) antennal sensillae of the clover head weevil, Hypera meles (F.)(Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Int. J. insect Morphol. Etnbryol. 5, 349–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Staedler, E. (1984) Contact chemoreception, pp. 3–35. In Chemical Ecology of Insects (Edited by Bell, W. J. and Carde, R. T.). Sinauer Associates, Inc., Sunderland, Mass., USA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Der Pers, J. N. C., Cuperus, P. L. and Den Otter, C. J. (1980) Distribution of sense organs on male antenna of small ermine moth, Yponomenta spp. (Lepidoptera: Yponomeutidae). Int. J. Insect Morphol. Embryol. 9, 15–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wall, C. (1978) Morphology and histology of the antenna of Cydia nigricana (F.). Int. J. Insect Morphol Embryol. 7, 237–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallis, D. I. (1962) The sense organs on the ovipositor of the blowfly, Phormia regina Meigen. J. Insect Physiol. 8, 453–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weissling, T. J. and Giblin-Davis, R. M. (1993) Water loss dynamics and humidity preference of Rhynchopltorus cruenlatus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) adults. Environ. Entomol. 22, 94–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitehead, A. T. (1981) Ultrastructure of sensillae of the female mountain pine beetle, Dendroctonus ponderosae Hopkins (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Int J. Insect Morphol Embryol. 10, 19–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, D. L. and Bushing, R. W. (1963) The olfactory response of Ips confusus (Le Conte)(Coleoptera: Scolytidae) to the secondary attraction in the laboratory. Can. Entomol. 95, 1066–1078.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yin, W. Y. and Li, Y. P. (1980) Scanning electron microscopy of antennal sensillae of the pink bollworm, Pectinophora gossypiella. Acta Entomol. Sin. 23, 123–199.Google Scholar
Zacharuk, R. Y. (1980) Ultrastructure and function of insect chemosensillae. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 25, 27–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar