Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T22:22:06.380Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Productive and nutritive traits of Piatã palisadegrass after thinning the forest component of a silvopastoral system in southeastern Brazil

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 August 2022

H. B. Brunetti Open the ORCID record for H. B. Brunetti [Opens in a new window] ,
J. R. M. Pezzopane ,
W. L. Bonani ,
C. Bosi ,
R. Pasquini Neto ,
A. C. de C. Bernardi  and
P. P. A. de Oliveira
H. B. Brunetti*
Affiliation:
Embrapa Pecuária Sudeste, km 234 Washington Luiz Highway, ‘Fazenda Canchim’, PO Box 339, São Carlos, São Paulo 13560-970, Brazil
J. R. M. Pezzopane
Affiliation:
Embrapa Pecuária Sudeste, km 234 Washington Luiz Highway, ‘Fazenda Canchim’, PO Box 339, São Carlos, São Paulo 13560-970, Brazil
W. L. Bonani
Affiliation:
Embrapa Pecuária Sudeste, km 234 Washington Luiz Highway, ‘Fazenda Canchim’, PO Box 339, São Carlos, São Paulo 13560-970, Brazil
C. Bosi
Affiliation:
Embrapa Pecuária Sudeste, km 234 Washington Luiz Highway, ‘Fazenda Canchim’, PO Box 339, São Carlos, São Paulo 13560-970, Brazil
R. Pasquini Neto
Affiliation:
Embrapa Pecuária Sudeste, km 234 Washington Luiz Highway, ‘Fazenda Canchim’, PO Box 339, São Carlos, São Paulo 13560-970, Brazil
A. C. de C. Bernardi
Affiliation:
Embrapa Pecuária Sudeste, km 234 Washington Luiz Highway, ‘Fazenda Canchim’, PO Box 339, São Carlos, São Paulo 13560-970, Brazil
P. P. A. de Oliveira
Affiliation:
Embrapa Pecuária Sudeste, km 234 Washington Luiz Highway, ‘Fazenda Canchim’, PO Box 339, São Carlos, São Paulo 13560-970, Brazil
*
Author for correspondence: H. B. Brunetti, E-mail: henrique.brunetti@alumni.usp.br
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Silvopastoral systems (SPSs) are sustainable alternatives for pasture intensification. Management practices such as thinning are options to diminish competition for resources between pasture and trees, ensuring appropriate forage production. The objective of this study was to evaluate the productive and nutritive traits of Piatã palisadegrass (Urochloa brizantha cv. BRS Piatã) after thinning the forest component of a SPS. Forage production and nutritive value, along with microclimate variables were assessed in a SPS and in an intensive system (INT) in São Carlos-SP, Brazil, from 2016 to 2018. The INT was a full sun pasture of Piatã palisadegrass, while the SPS was established with Piatã palisadegrass shaded by eucalyptus (Eucalyptus urograndis clone GG100) spaced 15 × 2 m but thinned to 15 × 4 m before the onset of the experiment. In the SPS, measurements were made under the tree row (SPS_1), 3.75-m (SPS_2), 7.5-m (SPS_3) and 11.25-m (SPS_4) distant from the North row. Forage accumulation in the two systems were similar, whereas the pre-grazing forage mass in most of the SPS positions were smaller than that of the INT during the autumn of 2017 and summer of 2018. Crude protein (CP) content was greater in the SPS than in the INT in most positions and seasons. Forage production was favoured by the thinning of the trees mainly in the seasons close to the event, while forage CP was consistently greater in the understory pasture. Thinning of trees in SPSs can be adopted to provide forage production similar to intensive pastures with higher protein content.

Keywords

(Eucalyptus urograndis) clone GG100forage accumulationintegrated systemsphotosynthetically active radiationUrochloa (syn. Brachiaria) brizantha (Hochst ex A. Rich.) Stapf cv. BRS Piatã
Type
Crops and Soils Research Paper
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 160 , Issue 5 , October 2022 , pp. 338 - 348
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alvares, CA, Stape, JL, Sentelhas, PC, Gonçalves, JDM and Sparovek, G (2013) Köppen’s climate classification map for Brazil. Meteorologische Zeitschrift 22(6), 711–728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alves, FV, Almeida, RG and Laura, VA (2015) Carne carbono neutro: um novo conceito para carne sustentável produzida nos trópicos. Campo Grande: Embrapa Gado de Corte. Available at http://www.infoteca.cnptia.embrapa.br/infoteca/handle/doc/1056155 (Accessed 2 November 2021).Google Scholar
Belsky, AJ, Mwonga, SM, Amundson, RG, Duxbuty, JM and Ali, AR (1993) Comparative effects of isolated trees on their undercanopy environments in high and low rainfall Savannas. Journal of Applied Ecology 30, 143–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bosi, C, Pezzopane, JRM, Sentelhas, PC, Santos, PM and Nicodemo, MLF (2014) Productivity and biometric characteristics of signal grass in a silvopastural system. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira 49, 449–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bosi, C, Pezzopane, JRM and Sentelhas, PC (2020 a) Silvopastoral system with eucalyptus as a strategy for mitigating the effects of climate change on Brazilian pasturelands. Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciencias 92, 1.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bosi, C, Pezzopane, JRM and Sentelhas, PC (2020 b) Soil water availability in a full sun pasture and in a silvopastoral system with eucalyptus. Agroforestry Systems 94, 429–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunetti, HB, Cavalcanti, PP, Dias, CTS, Pezzopane, JRM and Santos, PM (2020) Climate risk and seasonal forage production of Marandu palisadegrass in Brazil. Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências 92, 3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bula, RJ (1972) Morphological characteristics of alfalfa plants grown at several temperatures 1. Crop Science 12, 683–686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Carvalho, P, Domiciano, LF, Mombach, MA, do Nascimento, HLB, Cabral, LdaS, Sollenberger, LE, Pereira, DH and Pedreira, BC (2019) Forage and animal production on palisadegrass pastures growing in monoculture or as a component of integrated crop–livestock–forestry systems. Grass and Forage Science 74, 650–660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deiss, L, Moraes, A, Pelissari, A, Neto, FS, Silva, VP and Adreolla, VRM (2014) Oat growth under different nitrogen doses in eucalyptus alley cropping system in subtropical Brazil. Revista Ciência Agronômica 45, 1014–1023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dias, MBdeC, Costa, KADeP, Severiano, EDaC, Bilego, UO, Furtini Neto, AE, Almeida, DP, Brand, SP and Vilela, L (2020) Brachiaria and Panicum maximum in an integrated crop-livestock system and a second-crop maize system in succession with soybean. The Journal of Agricultural Science 158, 349–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Do Nascimento, HLB, Pedreira, BC, Sollenberger, LE, Pereira, DH, Magalhães, CAdeS and Chizzotti, FHM (2019) Physiological characteristics and forage accumulation of grazed Marandu palisade grass (Brachiaria brizantha) growing in monoculture and in silvopasture with Eucalyptus urograndis. Crop and Pasture Science 70, 384–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dumont, B, Andueza, D, Niderkorn, V, Luscher, A, Porqueddu, C and Picon-Cochard, C (2015) A meta-analysis of climate change effects on forage quality in grasslands: specificities of mountain and Mediterranean areas Grass. Grass and Forage Science 70, 239–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, J and Poorter, H (2001) Photosynthetic acclimation of plants to growth irradiance: the relative importance of specific leaf area and nitrogen partitioning in maximizing carbon gain. Plant, Cell & Environment 24, 755–767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernández, RJ, Wang, M and Reynolds, JF (2002) Do morphological changes mediate plant responses to water stress? A steady-state experiment with two C4 grasses. New Phytologist 155, 79–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferreira, EA, Abreu, JG, Martinez, JC, Braz, TGS and Ferreira, DP (2018) Cutting ages of elephant grass for chopped hay production. Pesquisa Agropecuária Tropical 48, 245–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geremia, EV, Crestani, S, Mascheroni, JDC, Carnevalli, RA, Mourão, GB and Silva, SC (2018) Sward structure and herbage intake of Brachiaria brizantha cv. Piatã in a crop-livestock-forestry integration area. Livestock Science 212, 83–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glatzle, S, Stuerz, S, Giese, M, Pereira, M, Almeida, RG, Bungenstab, DJ, Macedo, MCM and Asch, F (2021) Seasonal dynamics of soil moisture in an integrated-crop-livestock-forestry system in Central-West Brazil. Agriculture 11, 245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gomes, FJ, Pedreira, CGS, Bosi, C, Cavalli, J, Holschuch, SG, Mourão, GB, Pereira, DH and Pedreira, BC (2019) Shading effects on marandu palisadegrass in a silvopastoral system: plant morphological and physiological responses. Agronomy Journal 111, 2332–2340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gomes, FJ, Pedreira, BC, Santos, PM, Bosi, C, Lulu, J and Pedreira, CGS (2020) Microclimate effects on canopy characteristics of shaded palisadegrass pastures in a silvopastoral system in the Amazon biome of central Brazil. European Journal of Agronomy 115, 126029.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jose, S, Gillespie, AR and Pallardy, SG (2004) Interspecific interactions in temperate agroforestry. Agroforestry Systems 61, 237–255.Google Scholar
Kichel, AN, Sousa, LCF, Almeida, RG and Costa, JAA (2018) Productivity and nutritional value of tropical grasses in monoculture and intercropping with interseason corn. Ciências Agrarias 39, 2517–2530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lima, MA, Paciullo, DS, Silva, FF, Morenz, MJ, Gomide, CA, Rodrigues, RA and Chizzotti, FH (2019) Evaluation of a long-established silvopastoral Brachiaria decumbens system: plant characteristics and feeding value for cattle. Crop and Pasture Science 70(9), 814–825.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, SP (1983) C4 photosynthesis at low temperatures. Plant, Cell & Environment 6, 345–363.Google Scholar
Lopes, CM, Paciullo, DSC, Araujo, SAC, Morenz, MJF, Gomide, CAdeM, Maurício, RM and Braz, TGdosS (2017) Plant morphology and herbage accumulation of signal grass with or without fertilization, under different light regimes. Ciência Rural 47, 1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mendes, MMS, Lacerda, CF, Cavalcante, ACR, Fernandes, FEP and de Oliveria, TS (2013) Desenvolvimento do milho sob influência de árvores de pau-branco em sistema agrossilvipastoril. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira 48, 1342–1350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mott, GO and Lucas, HL (1952) The design, conduct, and interpretation of grazing trials on cultivated and improved pastures. In Proceedings of the International Grassland Congress, pp. 1380–1385.Google Scholar
Nair, PKR, Buresh, RJ, Mugendi, DN and Latt, CR (1999) Nutrient cycling in tropical agroforestry systems: myths and science. In Buck, LE, Lassoie, JP and Fernandes, ECM (eds), Agroforestry in Sustainable Agricultural Systems. Boca Raton, FL: Lewis Publisher Inc, pp. 1–31.Google Scholar
Nelson, CJ and Moser, LE (1994) Plant factors affecting forage quality. In Fahey, GC (ed.), Forage Quality, Evaluation, and Utilization. Ames, IA, pp. 115–154. Madison, WI (USA): ASA/CSSA/SSSAGoogle Scholar
Newman, SM, Bennett, K and Wu, Y (1998) Performance of maize, beans and ginger as intercrops in Paulownia plantations in China. Agroforestry Systems 39, 23–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicodemo, MLF, Castiglioni, PPC, Pezzopane, JRM, Tholon, P and Carpanezzi, AA (2016) Reducing competition in agroforestry by pruning native trees. Revista Árvore 40, 509–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paciullo, DSC, Castro, CRT, Gomide, CAM, Maurício, RM, Pires, MdeFA, Muller, MD and Xavier, DF (2011 a) Performance of dairy heifers in a silvopastoral system. Livestock Science 141, 166–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paciullo, DSC, Gomide, CAM, Castro, CRTD, Fernandes, PB, Muller, MD, Pires, MdeFA, Fernandes, EN and Xavier, DF (2011 b) Características produtivas e nutricionais do pasto em sistema agrossilvipastoril, conforme a distância das árvores. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira 46, 1176–1183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pang, K, Van Sambeek, JW, Navarrete-Tindall, NE, Lin, C, Jose, S and Garret, HE (2019) Responses of legumes and grasses to non-, moderate, and dense shade in Missouri, USA. I. Forage yield and its species-level plasticity. Agroforestry Systems 93, 11–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pezzopane, JRM, Bosi, C, Nicodemo, MLF, Santos, PM, da Cruz, PG and Parmejiani, RS (2015) Microclimate and soil moisture in a silvopastoral system in southeastern Brazil. Agrometereology 74, 110–119.Google Scholar
Pezzopane, JRM, Bernardi, ACC, Bosi, C, Oliveira, PPA, Marconato, MH, Pedroso, AdeF and Esteves, SN (2019 a) Forage productivity and nutritive value during pasture renovation in integrated systems. Agroforestry Systems 93, 39–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pezzopane, JRM, Nicodemo, MLF, Bosi, C, Garcia, AR and Lulu, J (2019 b) Animal thermal comfort indexes in silvopastoral systems with different tree arrangements. Journal of Thermal Biology 79, 103–111.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pezzopane, JRM, Bonani, WL, Bosi, C, da Rocha, ELF, Bernardi, ACdeC, Oliveria, PPA and Pedroso, AdeF (2020 a) Reducing competition in a crop-livestock-forest integrated system by thinning eucalyptus trees. Experimental Agriculture 56, 574–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pezzopane, JRM, Bernardi, ACC, Azenha, MV, Oliveira, PPA, Bosi, C, Pedroso, AdeF and Esteves, SN (2020 b) Production and nutritive value of pastures in integrated livestock production systems: shading and management effects. Scientia Agricola 77(2). doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-992X-2018-0150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Primavesi, AC, Andrade, AG, Alves, BJR, Rosso, C, Batista, EM, Prates, HT, Ortiz, FR, Mello, J, Ferraz, MR, Linhares, NW, Machado, PLOA, Moeller, R, Alves, RCS and Silva, WM (2005) Métodos de análise de solo. In Nogueira, ARA and Souza, GB (eds), Manual de laboratórios: solo, água, nutrição vegetal, nutrição animal e alimentos. São Carlos: Embrapa Pecuária Sudeste, pp. 67–130.Google Scholar
Reynolds, PE, Simpson, JA, Thevathasan, NV and Gordon, AM (2007) Effects of tree competition on corn and soybean photosynthesis, growth, and yield in a temperate tree-based agroforestry intercropping system in southern Ontario, Canada. Ecological Engineering 29, 362–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santos, DDeC, Júnior, RG, Vilela, L, Pulrolnik, K, Bufon, VB and França, AFdeS (2016) Forage dry mass accumulation and structural characteristics of Piatã grass in silvopastoral systems in the Brazilian savannah. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 233, 16–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santos, DC, Júnior, RG, Vilela, L, Maciel, GA and França, AFdeS (2018) Implementation of silvopastoral systems in Brazil with Eucalyptus urograndis and Brachiaria brizantha: productivity of forage and an exploratory test of the animal response. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 266, 174–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SAS. SAS/STAT (2016) User's Guide. 9.4. Cary, NC, USA: SAS Inst, Inc.Google Scholar
Soil Survey Staff (2014) Keys to Soil Taxonomy, 12th Edn. Lincoln: Natural Resource Conservation Service, USDA.Google Scholar
Tian, S, Cacho, JF, Youssef, MA, Chescheir, GM, Fischer, M, Nettles, JE and King, JS (2017) Switchgrass growth and pine–switchgrass interactions in established intercropping systems. GCB Bioenergy 9, 845–857.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wedderburn, ME and Carter, J (1999) Litter decomposition by four functional tree types for use in silvopastoral systems. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 31, 455–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, JR (1996) Shade-stimulated growth and nitrogen uptake by pasture grasses in a subtropical environment. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 47, 1075–1093.CrossRefGoogle Scholar