Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T11:34:19.521Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Early talk about the past revisited: affect in working-class and middle-class children's co-narrations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 1999

LISA K. BURGER
Affiliation:
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
PEGGY J. MILLER
Affiliation:
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

Abstract

This study contributes to our understanding of sociocultural variation in children's early storytelling by comparing co-narrations produced by children and their families from two European-American communities, one working-class and one middle-class. Six children from each community were observed in their homes at 2;6 and 3;0 years of age, yielding a corpus of nearly 400 naturally-occurring co-narrations of past experience. Analyses of generic properties, content, and emotion talk revealed a complex configuration of similarities and differences. Working-class and middle-class families produced co-narrations that were similar in referential/evaluative functions and temporal structure, with a preponderance of positive content. Working-class families produced twice as many co-narrations as their middle-class counterparts, produced more negative emotion talk, and used more dramatic language for conveying negative emotional experience. These findings suggest that (1) differentiation between working-class and middle-class communities in the content of early narratives may occur primarily with respect to negative experience and (2) researchers need to go beyond emotion state terms in order to accurately represent sociocultural variation in personal storytelling.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1999 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

An earlier version of this paper was presented at the 1997 biennial meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development. We wish to thank the families who participated in this study. We are also grateful to Lisa Hoogstra and Judith Mintz who collected the data for the study and Paula Day and Melissa Sheckler for help in transcription and coding of data. The data for this study were collected under a grant from The Spencer Foundation awarded to the second author.