Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T13:41:16.022Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Dietary supplementation with selenium and vitamin E improves milk yield, composition and rheological properties of dairy Jonica goats

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2011

Vincenzo Tufarelli  and
Vito Laudadio
Vincenzo Tufarelli*
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Health and Welfare, University of Study of Bari ‘Aldo Moro’, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Strada Prov. le per Casamassima, km 3, 70010 Valenzano (Ba), Italy
Vito Laudadio
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Health and Welfare, University of Study of Bari ‘Aldo Moro’, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Strada Prov. le per Casamassima, km 3, 70010 Valenzano (Ba), Italy
*
*For correspondence; e-mail: v.tufarelli@veterinaria.uniba.it
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of dietary supplementation with selenium (Se) and vitamin E (VitE) on milk yield, composition and renneting parameters in dairy Jonica breed goats. Forty multiparous lactating goats fed the same basal diet were randomly allocated to 1 of 2 dietary treatments: for 135 days, the experimental period. Basal diet was composed by ad libitum mixed vetch-oat hay and a definite amount of a pelleted concentrate. Dietary treatments included: (1) the control diet containing background Se and VitE only, and (2) the experimental diet containing sodium selenite as the Se supplement in concentrate (0·20 mg/head per day of Na-selenite and 20 mg/day per head of VitE). During the trial, no significant differences (P>0·05) were registered in dry matter intake and body weight gain among groups. Goats fed Se-VitE diet showed the highest milk production (P<0·05), and fat (P<0·01) and protein (P<0·05) yields and percentages. Somatic cell count were significantly lower in Se-VitE diet compared with control group (P<0·05). Significant differences (P<0·05) were observed in milk renneting properties. Based on our results, it was concluded that dietary supplementation with SE and VitE led to an increase of milk production and quality in Jonica goat, with positively improvement in milk coagulation aptitude.

Keywords

SeleniumVitamin Emilk compositiongoat
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Dairy Research , Volume 78 , Issue 2 , May 2011 , pp. 144 - 148
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ali, AKA & Shook, GE 1980 An optimum transformation for somatic cell concentration in milk. Journal of Dairy Science 63 487–490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
AOAC 2000 Official Methods of Analysis Association of Official Analytical Chemists, 17th ed. Arlington, VAGoogle Scholar
Barrionuevo, M, Alferez, MJM, Lopez, Aliaga I, Sanz Sampelayo, MR & Campos, MS 2002 Beneficial effect of goat milk on nutritive utilization of iron and cooper in malabsorption syndrome. Journal of Dairy Science 85 657–664CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calamari, L, Petrera, F & Bertin, G 2010 Effects of either sodium selenite or Se yeast (Sc CNCM I-3060) supplementation on selenium status and milk characteristics in dairy cows. Livestock Science 128 154–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goetsch, AL, Detweiler, G, Sahlu, T, Hayes, J & Puchala, R 2003 Effects of separate offering of forage and concentrate on feed intake and growth of Alpine doelings. Small Ruminant Research 48 209–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guyot, H, Spring, P, Andrieu, S & Rollin, F 2007 Comparative responses to sodium selenite and organic selenium supplements in Belgian Blue cows and calves. Livestock Science 111 259–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
INRA 1989 Ruminant Nutrition Recommended Allowances and Feed Tables. Ed. INRA, Versailles, ParisGoogle Scholar
ISTAT 2006 Italian Office for National Statistics, Censimento nazionale dell'agricoltura. http.//www.census.istat.it.Google Scholar
Juniper, DT, Phipps, RH, Jones, AK & Bertin, G 2006 Selenium supplementation of lactating dairy cows: Effect on selenium concentration in blood, milk, urine and feces. Journal of Dairy Science 89 3544–3551CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kondyli, E, Katsiari, MC & Voutsinas, LP 2007 Variations of vitamin and mineral contents in raw goat milk of the indigenous Greek breed during lactation. Food Chemistry 100 226–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koyuncu, M & Yerlikaya, H 2007 Effect of selenium-vitamin E injections of ewes on reproduction and growth of their lambs. South African Journal of Animal Science 37 233–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lacetera, N, Bernabucci, U, Ronchi, B & Nardone, A 1999 The effects of injectable sodium selenite on immune function and milk production in Sardinian sheep receiving adequate dietary selenium. Veterinary Research 30 363–370Google ScholarPubMed
Landau, S, Kababya, D, Silanikove, N, Nitsan, R, Lifshitz, L, Baram, H, Bruckental, I & Mabjeesh, SJ 2005 The ratio between dietary rumen degradable organic matter and crude protein may affect milk yield and composition in dairy sheep. Small Ruminant Research 58 115–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laudadio, V & Tufarelli, V 2010 Effects of pelleted total mixed rations with different rumen degradable protein on milk yield and composition of Jonica dairy goat. Small Ruminant Research 90 47–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, MC, Hwang, SY & Chion, PWS 2001 Application of rumen undegradable protein on early lactating dairy goats. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences 14 1549–1554CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Licitra, G, Hernandez, TM & Van Soest, PJ 1996 Standardization of procedures for nitrogen fractionation of ruminant feed. Animal Feed Science of Technology 57 347–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Littel, RC, Henry, PR & Ammerman, CB 1998 Statistical analysis of repeated measures data using SAS procedures. Journal of Animal Science 76 1216–1231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pechova, A, Janstova, B, Misurova, L, Drackova, M, Vorlova, L & Pavlata, L 2008 Impact of supplementation of various selenium forms in goats on quality and composition of milk, cheese and yoghurt. Acta Veterinaria Brno 77 407–414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petrera, F, Calamari, L & Bertin, G 2009 Effect of either sodium selenite or Se–yeast supplementation on selenium status and milk characteristics in dairy goats. Small Ruminant Research 82 130–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ravi, Kumar M, Tiwari, DP & Anil, Kumar P 2005 Effect of undegradable dietary protein level and plane of nutrition on lactation performance in crossbred cattle. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences 18 1407–1413Google Scholar
SAS 2001 SAS/STAT. User's Guide Statistical Analysis System Inst, Cary, NCGoogle Scholar
Shi, L, Zhang, C, Yue, W, Shia, L, Zhu, X & Lei, F 2010 Short-term effect of dietary selenium-enriched yeast on semen parameters, antioxidant status and Se concentration in goat seminal plasma. Animal Feed Science and Technology 157 104–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sniffen, CJ, O'Connor, JD, Fox, DG & Van Soest, PJ 1992 A net carbohydrate and protein system for evaluating cattle diets: 2 Carbohydrate and protein availability. Journal of Animal Science 70 3562–3577CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tufarelli, V, Dario, M & Laudadio, V 2009 Forage to concentrate ratio in Jonica breed goats: influence on lactation curve and milk composition. Journal of Dairy Research 76 124–128CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Soest, PJ, Robertson, JB & Lewis, BA 1991 Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science 74 3583–3597CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zannoni, M & Annibaldi, S 1981 Standardization of the renneting ability of milk by Formagraph. Scienza e Tecnica Lattiero-Casearia 32 79–94Google Scholar
Liu, ZL, Yang, DP, Chen, P, Dong, WX & Wang, DM 2008 Supplementation with selenium and vitamin E improves milk fat depression and fatty acid composition in dairy cows fed fat diet. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences 21 838–844CrossRefGoogle Scholar