Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T17:32:26.408Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sentimental prehistories: the construction of the Fenland past

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 January 2017

Christopher Evans
Christopher Evans*
Affiliation:
Cambridge Archaeological Unit, Department of Archaeology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 1PA, Great Britain
Get access

Abstract

The historical constitution of the region's past is considered through the study of folklore, miscellaneous ‘lay’ sources, commercial histories and antiquarian accounts – all variously socially and economically sympathetic. Of broad relevance is the changing nature of reference/authority, the conceptualisation of landscape as waste/frontier and the role of ‘natives’. In this case of internal colonialism, parallels are drawn concerning the status of land and archaeological practice within the developing world today.

La constitution historique du passé de la région est considérée à travers l'étude du folklore, de diverses sources “profanes”, de l'histoire du commerce et de récits de passionnés d'histoire, éléments qui sont tous pertinents du point de vue économique et social. D'autres éléments pertinents sont la nature changeante des références/sources, la conceptualisation du paysage en tant que terres non-utilisées/frontières et le rôle des “autochtones”. Un cas de colonialisme interne: on tire des parallèles en ce qui concerne le statut de la terre et de la pratique archéologique au sein du monde en voie de développement d'aujourd'hui.

Durch eine Studie von Folklore, verschiedenartigen ‘Laien’-Quellen, kommerziellen Geschichten und antiquarischen Darstellungen – alle auf unterschiedliche Art und Weise sozial und wirtschaftlich sympathisch – wird die historische Konstitution der Vergangenheit dieser Region betrachtet. Von allgemeiner Bedeutung sind der sich wandelnde Charakter von Bezug/Autorität, die Entstehung eines Begriffes von Landschaft als Abfall/Grenze und die Rolle von ‘Einheimischen’. Als Fallbeispiel für internen Kolonialismus können Parallelen gezogen werden, die den Stellenwert des Landes und die archäologische Praxis in heutigen Entwicklungsländern betreffen.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of European Archaeology , Volume 5 , Issue 2 , Autumn 1997 , pp. 105 - 136
Copyright
Copyright © European Association of Archaeologists 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ashton, John, 1882. Chap-Books of the Eighteenth Century. London: Chatto and Windus.Google Scholar
Attema, Peter, 1996. Inside and Outside the Landscape: Perceptions of the Pontine Region of Central Italy. Archaeological Dialogues 3: 176–195.Google Scholar
Badeslade, Thomas, 1725. The History of the Ancient and Present State of the Navigation of the Port of King's-Lynn and of Cambridge. London: Roberts.Google Scholar
Barrett, William H., 1963. Tales from the Fens. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Barrett, William H., 1964. More Tales from the Fens. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Bayne, Alexander D., 187-. Royal Illustrated History of Eastern England. Great Yarmouth: James Macdonald.Google Scholar
Bede, (trans. Sherley-Price, L.), 1968. A History of the English Church and People. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Bevis, Trevor, 1983. Strangers in the Fen. March: Westrydale.Google Scholar
Boon, James A., 1982. Other Tribes, Other Scribes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Briggs, Asa, 1979. The Age of Improvement, 2nd edn. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Briggs, Katherine M., 1971. A Dictionary of British Folk-Tales in the English Language. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Brody, Hugh, 1981. Maps and Dreams. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Brody, Hugh, 1987. Living Arctic. London: Faber.Google Scholar
Burgess, Jacquelen, 1982. Filming the Fens: a visual interpretation of regional character. In Gold, J.R. and Burgess, J. (eds), Valued Environments. London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Burke, Peter, 1981. The Discovery of Popular culture. In Samuel, R. (ed.), People's History and Socialist Theory: 216–226. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Burton, Robert, 1621. The Anatomy of Melancholy. Oxford (1971 Facsimile Edition, Amsterdam: De Capo Press).Google Scholar
Caton, Hiram, 1988. The Politics of Progress: The Origins and Development of the Commercial Republic 1600–1835. Gainsville: University of Florida Press.Google Scholar
Clark, J.G.D., Godwin, H., Godwin, M.E. and Clifford, M.H., 1935. Report of the Recent Excavation at Peacock's Farm, Shippea Hill, Cambridgeshire. Antiquaries Journal 15: 284–319.Google Scholar
Curtis, L.P. Jr., 1968. Anglo-Saxons and Celts: A Study of Anti-Irish Prejudice in Victorian England. Bridgeport, CT: University of Bridgeport.Google Scholar
Dack, C., 1911. Weather and Folk-Lore of Peterborough and District. (Reprint, Cambridgeshire Libraries Local History Series).Google Scholar
Darby, Henry C., 1940. The Medieval Fenland. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Darby, Henry C., 1956. The Draining of the Fens, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Darby, Henry C., 1973. The Age of the Improver: 1600–1800. In Darby, H.C (ed.), A New Historical Geography of England: 302–388. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dugdale, William, 1662. The History of Imbanking and Draining of Divers Fenns and Marshes. London.Google Scholar
Dyson, Stephen (ed.), 1985. Comparative Studies in the Archaeology of Colonialism. Oxford: British Archaeological Reports (International Series) 233.Google Scholar
Elbstobb, W., 1793. An Historical Account of the Great Level of the Fens. London: Crowder.Google Scholar
Evans, Christopher, 1985. Tradition and the Cultural Landscape: An Archaeology of Place. Archaeology Review from Cambridge 4: 80–94.Google Scholar
Evans, Christopher, 1987. Nomads in ‘waterland’?: Prehistoric Transhumance and Fenland Archaeology. Proceedings of the Cambridge Antiquarian Society 76: 27–39.Google Scholar
Evans, Christopher, 1990. Power on silt: towards an archaeology of the East India Company. Antiquity 64: 643–661.Google Scholar
Evans, Christopher, 1994. Natural wonders and national monuments: a meditation upon the fate of The Tolmen. Antiquity 68: 200–208.Google Scholar
Evans, Christopher, 1997. Hydraulic Communities: Iron Age enclosure in the East Anglian Fenlands. In Gwilt, A. and Haselgrove, C. (eds), Re-constructing the Iron Age. Oxford: Owbow Books.Google Scholar
Evans, Christopher and Hodder, Ian, 1987. Between the Two Worlds: Archaeological Investigations in Haddenham Level. In Coles, J.M. and Lawson, A.J. (eds), European Wetlands in Prehistory: 180–191. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Evans, Christopher and Serjeantson, Dale, 1988. The backwater economy of a Fen-edge Community in the Iron Age. Antiquity 62: 360–370.Google Scholar
Fabian, Johannes, 1983. Time and the Other. New York; Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Flynt, J. Wayne, 1979. Dixie's Forgotten People. Bloomington and London: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Fox, Cyril, 1923. The Archaeology of the Cambridge Region. Cambridge; Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Frampton, G., 1989. Whittlesey Straw Bear. Peterborough: Cambs. Libraries Publications.Google Scholar
Caches, L., 1900. Fortrey of Byal Fen. Fenland Notes and Queries 4 (853): 352–358.Google Scholar
Garthoff-Zwann, M., 1987. An Ethnohistorical Perspective in Archaeology. In Brandt, R.W., Groenman-van Waateringe, W. and van der Leeuw, S.E. (eds), Assendelver Polder Papers I: 333–338. University of Amsterdam (Cingula 10).Google Scholar
Godwin, Harry, 1978. Fenland: Its Ancient Past and Uncertain Future. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gonner, E.C.K., 1966. Common Land and Enclosure, 2nd edn. London: Frank Cass.Google Scholar
Gooch, W., 1813. General View of the Agriculture of the County of Cambridge. London: Deighton, Nicolson and Barratt.Google Scholar
Grove, Richard, 1981. Cressey Dymock and the Draining of the Fens: An early Agricultural Model. Geographical Journal 147: 27–37.Google Scholar
Grove, Richard, 1995. Green Imperialism: Colonial Expansion, Tropical Island Edens and the Origins of Environmentalism, 1600–1860. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hall, David N., 1981. Cambridgeshire Fenland: An Intensive Fieldwork Survey. In Rowley, T. (ed.), The Evolution of Marshland Landscapes. Oxford: External Studies.Google Scholar
Hall, David N. and Coles, John M., 1994. The Fenland Survey: An essay in landscape and persistence. London: English Heritage.Google Scholar
Hamper, W., 1827. The Life, Diary and Correspondence of Sir William Dugdak. London: Harding, Lepard and Co.Google Scholar
Hastrup, Kristen, 1987. Presenting the Past – Reflections on Myth and History. Folk 29: 257–269.Google Scholar
Heathcote, John M., 1876. Reminiscences of Fen and Mere. London: Longmans, Green and Co.Google Scholar
Hechter, M., 1975. Internal Colonialism: The Celtic Fringe in British National Development 1536–1966. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Hill, Christopher, 1954. The Norman Yoke. In Saville, J. (ed.), Democracy and the Labour Movement: 11–66. London: Lawrence and Wishart.Google Scholar
Hill, Christopher, 1972. The World Turned Upside Down. London: Maurice and Temple Smith.Google Scholar
Hill, Christopher, 1974. Change and Continuity in Seventeenth Century England. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.Google Scholar
Hill, Christopher, 1982. Science and magic in seventeenth century England. In Samuel, R. and Stedman Jones, G. (eds), Culture, Ideology and Politics. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Hill, Polly, 1992. Who were the Fen people? Proceedings of the Cambridge Antiquarian Society: 81: 97–114.Google Scholar
Hodgen, Margaret T., 1964. Early Anthropology in the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Hobsbawm, Eric and Ranger, T. (eds), 1983. The Invention of Tradition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Husband, Timothy, 1980. The Wild Man: Medieval Myth and Symbolism. New York: Metropolitan Museum of Art.Google Scholar
James, M.H., 1891. Bogie Tales of East Anglia. Ipswich: Pawsley and Hayes.Google Scholar
Kermode, Frank (ed.), 1988. Shakespeare's, W. The Tempest. London: Roudedge.Google Scholar
Kingsley, Charles, 1867. The Fens. Good Words (1/5/67):302–310.Google Scholar
Kingsley, Charles, 1875. The Roman and the Teuton. Cambridge: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Kuklick, Henrika, 1984. Tribal exemplars: images of political authority in British anthropology, 1885–1945. In Stocking, G.W. Jr. (ed.), Functionalism Historicised (History of Anthropology 2). Madison and London: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Kunzle, David, 1978. World upside down: the iconography of a European broadsheet type. In Babcock, B.A. (ed), The Reversible World: 39–94. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Leone, Mark P., 1984. Interpreting ideology in Historical Archaeology: using the rules of perspective in the William Paca garden in Annapolis, Maryland. In Miller, D. and Tilley, C. (eds), Ideology, Power and Prehistory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lindley, Keith, 1982. Penland Riots and the English Revolution. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Lofgren, O., 1989. Landscapes and mindscapes. Folk 31: 183–208.Google Scholar
Lucas, Charles, 1930. The Penman's World. London: Jarrold.Google Scholar
Markus, Thomas A., 1987. Buildings as classifying devices, Planning and Design 14: 467–484.Google Scholar
Marlowe, Christopher, 1926. Legends of the Penland People. London: Cecil Palmer.Google Scholar
Miller, Daniel, Rowlands, Michael and Tilley, Christopher (eds), 1989, Domination and Resistance (One World Archaeology 3). London: Unwin Hyman.Google Scholar
Miller, Samuel H. and Skertchly, Sydney B.J., 1878. The Penland: Past and Present. London.Google Scholar
Neilson, Nellie, 1920. A Terrier of Fleet, Lincolnshire. Records of the Social and Economic History of England and Wales. London.Google Scholar
Olwig, Kenneth, 1984. Nature's Ideological Landscape. London: George Allan and Unwin.Google Scholar
Parker, Rowland, 1983. Town and Gown. Cambridge: Stephens.Google Scholar
Piggott, Stuart, 1976. Ruins in a Landscape. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Piggott, Stuart, 1989. Ancient Britons and the Antiquarian Imagination. London: Thames and Hudson.Google Scholar
Porter, Enid, 1969a. Cambridgeshire Customs and Folklore. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Porter, Enid, 1969b. Fenland peat. In Jenkins, G. (ed.), Studies of Folk Life: 157–182. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Porter, Harry C., 1979. The Inconstant Savage. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Pryor, Francis, 1978. Excavation at Fengate, Peterborough, England: The Second Report. Royal Ontario Museum Archaeological Monograph 5.Google Scholar
Pryor, Francis, 1984. Excavation at Fengate, Peterborough, England: The Fourth Report. Northants, Arch. Soc. Mon. 2/ Roy. Ont. Mus. Arch. Mon. 7. Northampton and Toronto.Google Scholar
Purchas, Samuel, 1906. Purchas His Pilgrimes: Hakluytus Posthumus (1625). Glasgow: Maclehose.Google Scholar
Quinn, D.B., 1966. The Elizabethan and Irish. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Rackham, Oliver, 1986. The History of the Countryside. London: J.M. Dent.Google Scholar
Rosaldo, Renaldo, 1978. The rhetoric of control: Ilongots viewed as natural bandits and wild Indians. In Babock, B.A. (ed.), The Reversible World: Symbolic Inversion in Art and Society. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Rowlands, Michael, 1988. Repetition and exteriorisation in narratives of historical origins. Critique of Anthropology 8: 43–62.Google Scholar
Schofield, John, 1984. The Building of London. London: Colonnade.Google Scholar
Skertchly, Sydney B.J., 1877. The Geology of the Fenland. Memoirs of the Geological Society, London.Google Scholar
Smith, Pamela, 1997. Grahame Clark's New Archaeology: the Fenland Research Committee and Cambridge prehistory in the 1930s. Antiquity 71: 11–30.Google Scholar
Spufford, Margret, 1974. Contrasting Communities: English Villagers in the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stocking, George W. Jr., 1987. Victorian Anthropology. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Summers, Dorothy, 1976. The Great Level. London: Newton Abbot.Google Scholar
Taussig, Michael, 1987. Shamanism, Colonialism, and the Wild Man. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, Alison and Hall, David N., 1977. ‘Roman Bank’ – A medieval seawall. Proceedings of the Cambridge Antiquarian Society 64: 63–68.Google Scholar
Taylor, Christopher, 1973. The Cambridgeshire Landscape. London: Hodder and Stoughton.Google Scholar
Thacker, Christopher, 1985. The History of Gardens. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Thirsk, Joan, 1953. The Isle of Axholm before Vermuyden. Agricultural History Review 1: 16–28.Google Scholar
Thirsk, Joan, 1970. Seventeenth century agriculture and social change. Agricultural History Review 18: 148–177.Google Scholar
Thomas, Kenneth, 1978. Religion and the Decline of Magic. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Thomas, Kenneth, 1983. Man and the Natural World. London: Allan Lane.Google Scholar
Thompson, Edward P., 1968. The Making of the English Working Class. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Thompson, Pishey, 1856. The History and Antiquities of Boston.Google Scholar
Tilley, Christopher, 1979. Post-glacial Communities in the Cambridge Region. Oxford. British Archaeological Reports 66.Google Scholar
Trevor-Roper, Hugh R., 1964. The Romantic Movement and the Study of History. London: Athlone Press.Google Scholar
Turner, R.C., 1986. Boggarts, Bogles, and Sir Gawain and the Green Knight: Lindow Man and the oral tradition. In Stead, I.M., Bourke, J.B. and Brothwell, D. (eds), Lindow Man: the body in the bog. London: British Museum.Google Scholar
Urry, James, 1984. Englishmen, Celt and Iberians: The ethnographic survey of the United Kingdom, 1892–1899. In Stocking, G.W. Jr. (ed.), Functionalism Historicised (History of Anthropology 2): 83–105. Madison and London: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Vestergaard, Torben A., 1989. ‘Traditional’ fisherman and modem Danish Society. Folk 31: 151–169.Google Scholar
Walker, N. and Craddock, T., 1849. The History of Wisbech and the Fens. Wisbech.Google Scholar
Waller, Martin, 1994. Flandrian environmental change in Fenland. East Anglian Archaeology 70/Fenland Project 9.Google Scholar
Watson, W., 1827. An Historical Account of the Ancient Town and Port of Wisbech. Wisbech: H. and J. Leach.Google Scholar
Wells, Samuel H., 1830. The History of the Drainage of the Great Level of the Fens. London.Google Scholar
Wheeler, William H., 1868. A History of the Fens of South Lincolnshire. Boston: J.M. Newcomb.Google Scholar
White, W.J., 1818. Sketches of characters… Illlustrative of the Counties of Norfolk, Cambridgeshire, and Middlesex. London: W.J. White.Google Scholar
Williams, M., 1970. The Drainage of the Somerset Levels. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Williams, Raymond, 1973. The Country and the City. London: Chatto and Windus.Google Scholar
Williamson, L., 1987. Tales they Tell. Stamford: Spiegl Press.Google Scholar
Wolf, Eric R., 1982. Europe and the People without History. Berkeley and London: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Young, Arthur, 1799. The Agriculture of the County of Lincolnshire.Google Scholar