Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T20:20:45.388Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Impact of Takeovers on Shareholder Wealth during the 1920s Merger Wave

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

Abstract

We examine the impact of merger announcements on protfolios of acquiring firm and target firm common stock from 1919 to 1930. despite vast changes in the economic and regulatory environment, overall acquisition profitability has remained remarkably constant over the last 70 and 80 years. Target firm shareholders in the 1920s clearly gained from takeovers, averaging abnormal retruns in excess of 15%, while acquiring firm shareholders essentially broke even. synergistic or monopolistic gains from consolidation were minimal. Unlike the more recent experience, target firm and acquiring firm abnormal returns were largely unaffected by the mode of acquisition, the means of financing, or the degree of industrial relatedness.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © School of Business Administration, University of Washington 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Bentley college, department of Economics, 175 Forest street, MA 02452, and Jack-sonville University, Davis College of Business, 2800 University Boulevard North, Jacksonville, FL 32211, respectively. We thank Patrick Byrne, Jay Flecher, Ronald Fontaine, Breton Hanley, and Tara Nussman for help in collecting the financial data, and Ralph Nelson for permitting us to use his and carl Eis's worksheets on merger activity from 1919 to 1930. We also thank T. Randolph Beard, Steve Grubaugh, David Gulley, Jonathan Karpoff (the editor), Lori Leeth Matsusaka (the referee), Dennis Mueller, Rexford Santerre, and Scott Summer for their helpful comments.

References

Agrawal, A.; Jaffe, J. F.; and Mandelkar, G. N.. “The Post-Merger Performance of Acquiring Firms: A Re-Examination of an Anomaly.” Journal of Finance, 47 (1992), 16051621.10.2307/2328956Google Scholar
Asquith, P.Merger Bids Uncertainty, and Stockholder Returns.” Journal of Financial Econimics, 11 (1983), 5183.10.1016/0304-405X(83)90005-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asquith, P.; Bruner, R. F.; and Mullins, D. W. Jr, “The Gains to Bidding Firms from Merger.” Journal of Financial Economics, 11 (1983), 121139.10.1016/0304-405X(83)90007-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barber, B. M., and Lyon, J. D.. “Detecting Long-Run Abnormal Stock Returns: The Empirical Power and Specification of Test Statistics.” Journal of Financial Economics, 43 (1997), 341372.10.1016/S0304-405X(96)00890-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berkovitch, E., and Narayanan, M. P.. “Movies for Takeovers: An Empirical Investigation.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 28 (1993), 347362.10.2307/2331418S0022109000008565CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borg, J. R.; Borg, M. O.; and Leeth, J. D.. “The Success of Mergers in the 1920s: A Stock Market Appraisal of the Second Merger Wave.” International Journal of Industrial Organization, 7 (1989), 117131.10.1016/0167-7187(89)90049-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradley, M.; Desai, A.; and Kim, E. H.. “Synergistic Gains from Corporate Acquisitions and Their Division between the Stockholders of Target and Acquriring Firms.” Journal of Financial Economics, 21 (1988), 340.10.1016/0304-405X(88)90030-XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cowles, A., 3rd, and Associates. Common Stock Indexes: 1871–1939. Bloomington, IN:Principia Press, Inc. (1939).Google Scholar
Du Boff, R. B., and Herman, E. S.. “The Promotional-Financial Dynamic of Merger Movements: A Historical Perspective.” Journal of Economic Issues, 23 (1989), 107133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eis, C. The 1919–1930 Merger Movement in American Industry. New York, NY: Arno Press(1977).Google Scholar
Franks, J. R. and Harris, R. S.. “Shareholder Wealth Effects of Corporate Takeovers: The U.K. Experience 1955–1985.” Journal of Financial Economics, 23 (1989), 225249.10.1016/0304-405X(89)90057-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franks, J. R. Harris, R. S.; and Mayer, C.. “Means of Payment in Takeovers: Results for the United Kingdom and the United States.” In Corporate Takeovers: causes And Consequences, Auer-bach, A., ed. Chicago, IL: Univ. of Chicago Press(1988).Google Scholar
Franks, J. R. Harris, R. S.; and Titman, S.. “The Postmerger Share-Price Performance of Acquiring Firms.” Journal of Financial Economics, 29(1991), 8196.10.1016/0304-405X(91)90014-BCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, Y., and Walking, R. S.. “Target Abnormal Retruns Associated with Acquisition Announcements: Payments, Acquition Form, and Managerial Resistance.” journal of financial economics, 19 (1987), 329349.10.1016/0304-405X(87)90008-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hubbard, R. G., and Palia, D.. “A Re-Examination of the Conglomerate Merger Wave in the 1960s: An Internal Capital Markets View.” Journal of Financial, 54 (1999), 11311152.Google Scholar
Jarrell, G. A.; Brickely, J. A.; and Netter, J. M.. “The Market for Corporate Control: The Empirical Evidence since 1980.” Journal of Economics Perspectives, 2 (1988), 4968.10.1257/jep.2.1.49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarrell, G. A. and Poulsen, A. B.. “The Returns to Acquiring Firms in Tender Offers: Evidence from Three Decads.” Financial Management, 18 (1989), 1219.10.2307/3665645CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, M. C., and Ruback, R. S.. “The Market for Corporate Control: The Scientific Evidence.” Journal of Financial Economics, 11 (1983), 550.10.1016/0304-405X(83)90004-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kothari, S. P., and Warner, J. B.. “Measuring Long-Horizon Security Price Performance.” Journal of Financial Economics, 43 (1997), 301339.10.1016/S0304-405X(96)00899-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leeth, J. D., and Borg, J. R.. “The Impact of Mergers on Acquiring Firm Shareholder Wealth: The 1905–1930 Experince.” Empirica, 21 (1994), 221244.10.1007/BF01384145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loderer, C., and Martin, K.. “Corporate Acquisitions by Listed Firms: The Expericence of A Comprehensive Sample.” Financial Management, 19 (1990), 1733.10.2307/3665607CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magenheim, E. B., and Mueller, D. C.. “Are Acquiring-Firm Shareholders Better Off after an Acquisition?” In Knights, Raiders, and Targets: The Impact of the Hostile Takeover, Coffee, J. C. Jr, Lowenstein, L., and Rose-Ackerman, S., eds. New York, NY: Oxford Univ. Press (1988).Google Scholar
Malatesta, P. H.The Wealth Effect of Merger Activity and the Objective Functions of Merging Firms.” Journal of Financial Economics, 11 (1983), 155181.10.1016/0304-405X(83)90009-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malatesta, P. H., and Thompson, R.. “Governmant Regulation and Structural Change in the Corporate Acquisitions Market: The Impact of the Williams Act.” Journal of Financial And Quantitative Analysis, 28 (1993), 363379.10.2307/2331419S0022109000008577CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matsusaka, J. G.Takeover Motives during the Conglomerate Merger Wave.” Rand Journal of Economics, 24 (1993), 357379.10.2307/2555963CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ravenscraft, D. J., and Scherer, F. M.. Mergers, Sell-Offs, and Economic Efficiency. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution (1987).Google Scholar
Roll, R.The Hubis Hypothsis of Corporate Takeovers.” Journal of Business, 59 (1986), 197216.10.1086/296325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scherer, F. M. Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance, 2nd ed. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally College Publishing Co. (1980).Google Scholar
Schwert, G. W.Indexes of U.S. Stock Prices from 1802 to 1987.” Journal of Business, 63 (1990), 399426.10.1086/296513CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwert, G. W.Markup Pricing in Mergers and Acquisitions.” Journal of Financial Economics, 41 (1996), 153192.10.1016/0304-405X(95)00865-CCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Varaiya, N. P.An Empirical Investigation of the Bidding Firms' Gains from Corporate Takeovers.” Research in Finance, 6 (1986), 149178.Google Scholar
White, H.A Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Coveriance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for Heteroskedasticity.” Econometrica, 48 (1980), 817838.10.2307/1912934CrossRefGoogle Scholar